Vanderbilt

SEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 21 · Raw net 15.2 · Tempo 70.4 · 36 Division I games · Through 2026-03-21

Record: 27–9; 27 wins
AdjNet: 22.1β; rank 12 of 365
AdjO: 122.7β; rank 8 of 365
AdjD: 100.7β; rank 33 of 365
AdjT: 69.6β
SOS: 10.2β; rank 14 of 363
NCSOS: 0.2β
WAB: 7.2β; rank 14 of 363
RR: 1.0β
Exp. W: 26.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	120.99	105.7102	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	55.330	49.066	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	13.514	17.7111	16.7
Offensive rebound %	31.2157	31.5231	30.6
FTA / FGA %	38.1100	39.5295	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.685	32.697	33.9
2P%	56.931	49.063	51.7
FT%	78.95	75.4331	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	44.2	37.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	56.5	46.8	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	12.5	7.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	33.5	29.0	31.4
2-pointers %	45.1	47.6	48.8
Free throws %	21.4	23.3	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 31%
Players with Logged Minutes: 15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Lipscomb	W 105–61	74.8	Home	1–0
11-08	UCF	W 105–93	74.2	Away	2–0
11-12	Eastern Ky.	W 92–62	72.8	Home	3–0
11-15	Ark.-Pine Bluff	W 104–75	74.5	Home	4–0
11-20	Texas Southern	W 109–74	74.6	Home	5–0
11-26	Western Ky.	W 83–78	80.6	Neutral	6–0
11-27	VCU	W 89–74	75.2	Neutral	7–0
11-28	Saint Mary's (CA)	W 96–71	72.5	Neutral	8–0
12-03	SMU	W 88–69	67.8	Home	9–0
12-13	Central Ark.	W 83–72	75.1	Home	10–0
12-17	Memphis	W 77–70 1OT	85.7	Away	11–0
12-21	Wake Forest	W 98–67	72.9	Away	12–0
12-29	New Haven	W 96–53	68.5	Home	13–0
01-03	South Carolina	W 83–71	65.0	Away	14–0
01-07	Alabama	W 96–90	82.9	Home	15–0
01-10	LSU	W 84–73	71.4	Home	16–0
01-14	Texas	L 64–80	66.3	Away	16–1
01-17	Florida	L 94–98	72.8	Home	16–2
01-20	Arkansas	L 68–93	67.4	Away	16–3
01-24	Mississippi St.	W 88–56	74.2	Away	17–3
01-27	Kentucky	W 80–55	70.0	Home	18–3
01-31	Ole Miss	W 71–68	63.9	Home	19–3
02-07	Oklahoma	L 91–92	74.3	Home	19–4
02-10	Auburn	W 84–76	64.0	Away	20–4
02-14	Texas A&M	W 82–69	69.8	Home	21–4
02-18	Missouri	L 80–81	69.9	Away	21–5
02-21	Tennessee	L 65–69	63.3	Home	21–6
02-25	Georgia	W 88–80	66.1	Home	22–6
02-28	Kentucky	L 77–91	68.0	Away	22–7
03-03	Ole Miss	W 89–86 1OT	77.0	Away	23–7
03-07	Tennessee	W 86–82	73.1	Away	24–7
03-13	Tennessee	W 75–68	62.4	Neutral	25–7
03-14	Florida	W 91–74	63.9	Neutral	26–7
03-15	Arkansas	L 75–86	70.1	Neutral	26–8
03-19	McNeese	W 78–68	63.9	—	27–8
03-21	Nebraska	L 72–74	63.9	—	27–9

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 36 of 36 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Tyler Tanner	36	33:26	83.0%	702	131	184	86	12	68	72	168–307	54.7%	60–163	36.8%	186–218	85.3%	54.9%	62.0%	46.4%	5	36:30 +3:04	91.2%	21.4 +1.9
Tyler Nickel	36	30:32	75.8%	486	117	43	28	19	26	49	53–91	58.2%	110–275	40.0%	50–59	84.7%	59.6%	62.0%	16.1%	5	30:29 −0:03	76.2%	12.4 −1.1
AK Okereke	36	26:17	65.2%	347	131	72	19	23	41	117	74–137	54.0%	40–100	40.0%	79–102	77.5%	56.5%	61.6%	43.0%	5	28:34 +2:18	71.4%	7.8 −1.8
Devin McGlockton	36	25:20	62.9%	341	244	44	13	23	35	114	108–152	71.1%	28–93	30.1%	41–56	73.2%	61.2%	63.2%	22.9%	5	27:18 +1:57	68.2%	6.8 −2.7
Duke Miles	28	29:30	57.0%	452	85	126	73	6	51	72	86–170	50.6%	48–138	34.8%	136–151	90.1%	51.3%	60.4%	49.0%	5	32:34 +3:04	81.4%	17.2 +1.1
Jalen Washington	36	20:31	50.9%	320	203	32	21	46	32	94	102–165	61.8%	10–34	29.4%†	86–116	74.1%	58.8%	64.0%	58.3%	5	19:40 −0:51	49.2%	8.4 −0.5
Chandler Bing	36	14:39	36.4%	130	57	15	10	8	22	51	32–52	61.5%†	11–38	28.9%†	33–52	63.5%	53.9%†	57.6%†	57.8%†	5	21:24 +6:45	53.5%	3.8 +0.2
Tyler Harris	30	12:38	26.1%	165	69	9	5	20	12	25	40–76	52.6%	23–80	28.7%	16–30	53.3%	47.8%	48.8%	19.2%	—	—	—	—
Mike James	22	10:27	15.9%	32	43	16	1	1	6	35	2–10	20.0%†	8–24	33.3%†	4–7	57.1%†	41.2%†	43.1%†	20.6%†	1	0:00 −10:27	0.0%	0.0 −1.5
Frankie CollinsFew games	9	20:51	12.9%	70	38	42	22	1	20	24	17–39	43.6%†	4–16	25.0%†	24–36	66.7%	41.8%†	49.4%†	65.5%†	—	—	—	—
Jayden Leverett	26	3:51	6.9%	25	31	1	3	3	1	22	9–15	60.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	4–7	57.1%†	61.8%†	62.3%†	41.2%†	3	4:27 +0:36	6.7%	0.7 −0.3
Mason NicholsonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	4:21	1.5%	2	5	0	1	1	1	4	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	50.0%†	50.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Jaylon Dean-VinesUnder 100 minutes	10	2:04	1.4%	9	4	2	2	0	2	2	3–3	100.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	90.0%†	82.7%†	20.0%†	—	—	—	—
Miles KeeffeUnder 100 minutes	12	1:24	1.2%	5	3	1	2	0	2	2	1–5	20.0%†	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	31.3%†	31.3%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Coleson MesserFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:08	0.5%	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	36 games			3086	1268	588	not published	164	344	not published	696–1224	56.9%	345–970	35.6%	659–835	78.9%	55.3%	60.2%	38.1%
Sum of players				3086	1161	587	286	163	320	684	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+107	+1	not published	+1	+24	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.55M to $4.90M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Tyler Tanner	84.8%	$840K	$550K to $1.30M	23.0%	$840K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Tyler Nickel	76.1%	$575K	$380K to $860K	16.0%	$575K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
AK Okereke	65.5%	$340K	$145K to $540K	10.1%	$340K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Devin McGlockton	64.8%	$460K	$280K to $690K	13.0%	$460K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Duke Miles	56.1%	$515K	$335K to $820K	14.0%	$515K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Jalen Washington	51.2%	$270K	$120K to $425K	8.0%	$270K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Chandler Bing	36.7%	$47K	$16K to $170K	1.3%	$47K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyler Harris	26.8%	$170K	$90K to $260K	5.0%	$170K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Mike James	17.1%	$42K	$17K to $97K	1.2%	$42K in all four	$23K	Sufficient evidence
Frankie Collins	9.9%	$69K	$40K to $105K	2.0%	$69K in all four	$23K	Limited evidence
Jayden Leverett	7.1%	$50K	$28K to $78K	1.5%	$50K in all four	$23K	Limited evidence
Jaylon Dean-Vines	1.5%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Miles Keeffe	1.3%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Mason Nicholson	0.7%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Coleson Messer	0.5%	$23K	$13K to $37K	0.7%	$23K in all four	$23K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.55M to $4.90M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Vanderbilt University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$13,322,320	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$13,322,320
Athletics department expenses	$146,388,389
Athletics department revenue	$146,388,389

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 36 games, 2,553 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	3,086	2,699
Field goals made	1,041	904
Field goals attempted	2,194	2,113
3-pointers made	345	261
3-pointers attempted	970	800
Free throws made	659	630
Free throws attempted	835	835
Offensive rebounds	384	407
Defensive rebounds	884	847
Total rebounds	1,268	1,254
Assists	588	423
Blocks	164	91
Turnovers	344	452
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 286.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 684.
Minutes (derived)	7,250	not published

36 of 36 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	3,086	3,086	0	±15.4	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,041	1,041	0	±5.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,194	2,194	0	±11.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	345	345	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	970	970	0	±4.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	659	659	0	±3.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	835	835	0	±4.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,268	1,161	+107	±101.4	0
Assists	Reconciled	588	587	+1	±2.9	0
Blocks	Reconciled	164	163	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	344	320	+24	±10.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	286	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	684	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,250	7,217	+33.2	±145.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Tyler Tanner	84.8%	+6.0range +4.6 to +7.5Sufficient evidence
Tyler Nickel	76.1%	+4.6range +3.2 to +5.9Sufficient evidence
AK Okereke	65.5%	+2.6range +1.3 to +4.3Sufficient evidence
Devin McGlockton	64.8%	+4.4range +2.9 to +5.7Sufficient evidence
Duke Miles	56.1%	+5.5range +4.2 to +6.8Sufficient evidence
Jalen Washington	51.2%	+2.8range +1.4 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Chandler Bing	36.7%	-1.8range -3.4 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Tyler Harris	26.8%	+3.1range +1.9 to +4.7Sufficient evidence
Mike James	17.1%	-1.3range -2.6 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Frankie Collins	9.9%	+2.6range +1.8 to +3.4Limited evidence
Jayden Leverett	7.1%	+1.8range +1.0 to +2.5Limited evidence
Jaylon Dean-Vines	1.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Miles Keeffe	1.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Mason Nicholson	0.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Coleson Messer	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +13.0range +12.1 to +13.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.2% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value