Tyler Tanner
Vanderbilt · 2025–26 · 36 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1203:40 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 36
- Minutes per game
- 33:26
- Points per game
- 19.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 5.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 19.5 | 3.6 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 23.3 | 4.4 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 702 | 131 | 184 | 86 | 12 | 68 | 72 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 228–470 | 48.5% | 13.1 | 15.6 |
| 2P | 168–307 | 54.7% | 8.5 | 10.2 |
| 3P | 60–163 | 36.8% | 4.5 | 5.4 |
| FT | 186–218 | 85.3% | 6.1 | 7.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.9% | 62.0% | 34.7% | 46.4% | 2.71 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Vanderbilt · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $840K
- 80% range $550K to $1.30M
- Median share of team pool
- 23.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $840K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 84.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Vanderbilt: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Vanderbilt | $840Kspeculative | $550K to $1.30M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +6.0 | +4.6 to +7.5 | Sufficient evidence | +4.2 | +1.8 | +10.1range +9.1 to +11.1 | 3,940 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Vanderbilt | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.8 | -0.7 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.7 | -0.9 | +2.4range +1.9 to +2.9 | 2,185 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:30 | 33:26 | 20:51–43:57 | |
| Points | 21.4 | 19.5 | 4.0–37.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.6% | 56.4% | 20.0%–94.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Nebraska | L 72–74 | 37:52 | 27 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-21 | 3-10 | 6-9 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-19 | McNeese | W 78–68 | 36:08 | 26 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-16 | 3-8 | 9-10 | 53.1% |
| 2026-03-15 | Arkansas | L 75–86 | 36:38 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-15 | 1-3 | 8-8 | 23.3% |
| 2026-03-14 | Florida | W 91–74 | 36:35 | 20 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 85.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | Tennessee | W 75–68 | 35:17 | 19 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 0-3 | 9-10 | 41.7% |
| 2026-03-07 | Tennessee | W 86–82 | 35:12 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-9 | 2-2 | 9-10 | 88.9% |
| 2026-03-03 | Ole Miss | W 89–86 | 43:57 | 34 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11-19 | 3-6 | 9-12 | 65.8% |
| 2026-02-28 | Kentucky | L 77–91 | 37:05 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9-12 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Georgia | W 88–80 | 39:11 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 8-9 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Tennessee | L 65–69 | 31:13 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-9 | 2-4 | 4-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-18 | Missouri | L 80–81 | 37:55 | 27 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-19 | 2-6 | 7-7 | 52.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Texas A&M | W 82–69 | 31:09 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-10 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | Auburn | W 84–76 | 39:12 | 25 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-16 | 1-4 | 12-13 | 40.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | Oklahoma | L 91–92 | 38:39 | 37 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10-23 | 3-6 | 14-18 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Ole Miss | W 71–68 | 36:34 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10-20 | 2-8 | 2-3 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | Kentucky | W 80–55 | 36:17 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-16 | 1-5 | 6-8 | 40.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Mississippi St. | W 88–56 | 34:16 | 24 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10-17 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 67.6% |
| 2026-01-20 | Arkansas | L 68–93 | 34:21 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 35.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Florida | L 94–98 | 36:22 | 20 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-14 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-14 | Texas | L 64–80 | 35:00 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5-15 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 43.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | LSU | W 84–73 | 35:12 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7-18 | 0-5 | 6-7 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | Alabama | W 96–90 | 33:09 | 29 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8-15 | 1-4 | 12-15 | 56.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | South Carolina | W 83–71 | 36:50 | 19 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 10-10 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | New Haven | W 96–53 | 27:05 | 23 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9-16 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 59.4% |
| 2025-12-21 | Wake Forest | W 98–67 | 27:19 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-17 | Memphis | W 77–70 | 41:38 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5-13 | 2-6 | 4-5 | 46.2% |
| 2025-12-13 | Central Ark. | W 83–72 | 31:18 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-12 | 1-7 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-03 | SMU | W 88–69 | 37:10 | 26 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-28 | Saint Mary's (CA) | W 96–71 | 29:04 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 61.1% |
| 2025-11-27 | VCU | W 89–74 | 27:41 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6-9 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | Western Ky. | W 83–78 | 20:51 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Texas Southern | W 109–74 | 28:07 | 20 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-9 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 94.4% |
| 2025-11-15 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 104–75 | 30:11 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-11 | 0-3 | 4-5 | 36.4% |
| 2025-11-12 | Eastern Ky. | W 92–62 | 21:17 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | UCF | W 105–93 | 24:00 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-11 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 59.1% |
| 2025-11-03 | Lipscomb | W 105–61 | 23:55 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6-10 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 80.0% |