Purdue

B10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 14 · Raw net 17.0 · Tempo 65.2 · 39 Division I games · Through 2026-03-28

Record: 30–9; 30 wins
AdjNet: 25.0β; rank 9 of 365
AdjO: 126.7β; rank 1 of 365
AdjD: 101.7β; rank 42 of 365
AdjT: 65.6β
SOS: 11.7β; rank 5 of 363
NCSOS: 4.3β
WAB: 9.4β; rank 5 of 363
RR: 0.9β
Exp. W: 29.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	124.82	107.8161	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	57.611	52.4232	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	13.717	15.3263	16.7
Offensive rebound %	36.419	27.138	30.6
FTA / FGA %	28.6337	25.58	35.0
Shooting
3P%	38.310	34.1192	33.9
2P%	57.723	53.3247	51.7
FT%	74.699	72.5182	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	40.2	43.8	39.5
Assists / FGM %	65.6	57.2	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.8	6.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	33.8	36.4	31.4
2-pointers %	50.6	48.6	48.8
Free throws %	15.6	15.0	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	Evansville	W 82–51	61.8	Home	1–0
11-07	Oakland	W 87–77	69.9	Home	2–0
11-13	Alabama	W 87–80	68.8	Away	3–0
11-16	Akron	W 97–79	72.5	Home	4–0
11-20	Memphis	W 80–71	67.5	Neutral	5–0
11-21	Texas Tech	W 86–56	66.4	Neutral	6–0
11-28	Eastern Ill.	W 109–62	71.9	Home	7–0
12-02	Rutgers	W 81–65	64.9	Away	8–0
12-06	Iowa St.	L 58–81	65.3	Home	8–1
12-10	Minnesota	W 85–57	65.3	Home	9–1
12-13	Marquette	W 79–59	65.1	Home	10–1
12-20	Auburn	W 88–60	65.2	Neutral	11–1
12-29	Kent St.	W 101–60	75.8	Home	12–1
01-03	Wisconsin	W 89–73	71.7	Away	13–1
01-07	Washington	W 81–73	70.7	Home	14–1
01-10	Penn St.	W 93–85	66.7	Home	15–1
01-14	Iowa	W 79–72	64.1	Home	16–1
01-17	Southern California	W 69–64	69.1	Away	17–1
01-20	UCLA	L 67–69	58.4	Away	17–2
01-24	Illinois	L 82–88	63.3	Home	17–3
01-27	Indiana	L 67–72	61.6	Away	17–4
02-01	Maryland	W 93–63	64.4	Away	18–4
02-07	Oregon	W 68–64	66.2	Home	19–4
02-10	Nebraska	W 80–77 1OT	76.0	Away	20–4
02-14	Iowa	W 78–57	57.8	Away	21–4
02-17	Michigan	L 80–91	69.7	Home	21–5
02-20	Indiana	W 93–64	63.5	Home	22–5
02-26	Michigan St.	L 74–76	62.4	Home	22–6
03-01	Ohio St.	L 74–82	61.5	Away	22–7
03-04	Northwestern	W 70–66	57.5	Away	23–7
03-07	Wisconsin	L 93–97	65.7	Home	23–8
03-12	Northwestern	W 81–68	59.4	Neutral	24–8
03-13	Nebraska	W 74–58	60.5	Neutral	25–8
03-14	UCLA	W 73–66	59.6	Neutral	26–8
03-15	Michigan	W 80–72	62.7	Neutral	27–8
03-20	Queens (NC)	W 104–71	67.5	—	28–8
03-22	Miami (FL)	W 79–69	65.6	—	29–8
03-26	Texas	W 79–77	60.8	—	30–8
03-28	Arizona	L 64–79	65.3	—	30–9

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 39 of 39 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Braden Smith	39	34:23	85.7%	557	138	345	66	8	113	62	133–271	49.1%	64–177	36.2%	99–120	82.5%	51.1%	55.6%	26.8%	5	35:02 +0:39	87.6%	16.2 +1.9
Fletcher Loyer	39	29:25	73.3%	548	91	80	28	2	39	45	54–110	49.1%	112–259	43.2%	104–119	87.4%	60.2%	65.0%	32.2%	5	31:54 +2:29	79.7%	15.6 +1.5
Trey Kaufman-Renn	37	28:32	67.5%	524	308	94	14	8	52	84	225–380	59.2%	2–13	15.4%†	68–107	63.6%	58.0%	59.5%	27.2%	5	32:05 +3:33	80.2%	18.8 +4.6
Oscar Cluff	39	24:17	60.5%	414	292	69	19	36	31	107	164–240	68.3%	0–0	—	86–123	69.9%	68.3%	70.4%	51.2%	5	25:12 +0:55	63.0%	12.6 +2.0
C.J. Cox	39	24:14	60.4%	330	108	49	20	4	12	48	56–92	60.9%	62–166	37.3%	32–38	84.2%	57.8%	60.1%	14.7%	5	25:15 +1:01	63.1%	8.6 +0.1
Gicarri Harris	39	15:25	38.4%	178	62	32	33	3	12	41	24–49	49.0%	33–93	35.5%	31–36	86.1%	51.8%	56.4%	25.4%	5	12:45 −2:40	31.9%	3.0 −1.6
Jack Benter	38	14:37	35.5%	166	97	31	15	2	17	57	22–33	66.7%	36–88	40.9%	14–23	60.9%†	62.8%	63.3%	19.0%	5	15:32 +0:55	38.8%	2.0 −2.4
Omer Mayer	39	14:12	35.4%	214	42	45	15	0	35	32	41–84	48.8%	39–110	35.5%	15–23	65.2%†	51.3%	52.4%	11.9%	5	12:00 −2:12	30.0%	3.0 −2.5
Daniel Jacobsen	39	13:16	33.0%	214	118	13	3	47	22	73	79–119	66.4%	3–8	37.5%†	47–75	62.7%	65.7%	66.9%	59.1%	5	8:52 −4:23	22.2%	0.8 −4.7
Liam MurphyUnder 100 minutes	12	7:14	5.5%	28	11	3	1	0	0	8	2–4	50.0%†	8–23	34.8%†	0–0	—	51.9%†	51.9%†	0.0%†	1	4:01 −3:13	2.0%	3.0 +0.7
Aaron FineFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	2:17	1.3%	11	0	3	0	0	2	4	5–10	50.0%†	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	50.0%†	50.6%†	20.0%†	—	—	—	—
Jack LuskFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	1:49	1.0%	0	3	0	0	0	1	3	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Jace RaylFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	1:40	0.9%	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	39 games			3184	1374	764	not published	110	349	not published	805–1394	57.7%	359–937	38.3%	497–666	74.6%	57.6%	60.7%	28.6%
Sum of players				3184	1270	764	214	110	336	566	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+104	0	not published	0	+13	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.60M to $5.00M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Braden Smith	86.0%	$705K	$480K to $1.00M	19.2%	$705K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Fletcher Loyer	73.5%	$650K	$435K to $990K	17.5%	$650K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Trey Kaufman-Renn	66.6%	$565K	$375K to $850K	15.4%	$565K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
C.J. Cox	61.3%	$495K	$340K to $725K	13.6%	$495K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Oscar Cluff	61.0%	$550K	$365K to $830K	15.0%	$550K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Gicarri Harris	38.2%	$99K	$27K to $220K	2.9%	$99K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Omer Mayer	35.4%	$110K	$30K to $215K	3.2%	$110K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jack Benter	35.3%	$140K	$46K to $250K	4.1%	$140K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Daniel Jacobsen	33.2%	$105K	$29K to $205K	3.0%	$105K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Liam Murphy	5.6%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Aaron Fine	1.5%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jack Lusk	1.2%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jace Rayl	1.0%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.60M to $5.00M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Purdue University-Main Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$20,966,991
Men's basketball expenses	$14,040,438
Athletics department expenses	$135,140,397
Athletics department revenue	$150,536,320

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 39 games, 2,552 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	3,184	2,751
Field goals made	1,164	1,002
Field goals attempted	2,331	2,233
3-pointers made	359	334
3-pointers attempted	937	979
Free throws made	497	413
Free throws attempted	666	570
Offensive rebounds	440	347
Defensive rebounds	934	768
Total rebounds	1,374	1,115
Assists	764	573
Blocks	110	89
Turnovers	349	391
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 214.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 566.
Minutes (derived)	7,825	not published

39 of 39 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	3,184	3,184	0	±15.9	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,164	1,164	0	±5.8	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,331	2,331	0	±11.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	359	359	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	937	937	0	±4.7	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	497	497	0	±2.5	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	666	666	0	±3.3	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,374	1,270	+104	±109.9	0
Assists	Reconciled	764	764	0	±3.8	0
Blocks	Reconciled	110	110	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	349	336	+13	±10.5	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	214	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	566	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,825	7,801	+24.3	±156.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Braden Smith	86.0%	+5.7range +4.5 to +6.6Sufficient evidence
Fletcher Loyer	73.5%	+6.2range +4.7 to +7.6Sufficient evidence
Trey Kaufman-Renn	66.6%	+5.9range +4.5 to +7.1Sufficient evidence
C.J. Cox	61.3%	+5.6range +4.4 to +6.7Sufficient evidence
Oscar Cluff	61.0%	+6.2range +4.8 to +7.6Sufficient evidence
Gicarri Harris	38.2%	+0.0range -1.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Omer Mayer	35.4%	+0.6range -0.7 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Jack Benter	35.3%	+1.5range +0.3 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Daniel Jacobsen	33.2%	+0.5range -0.9 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Liam Murphy	5.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Aaron Fine	1.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jack Lusk	1.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jace Rayl	1.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +13.6range +12.5 to +14.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 98.1% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.9%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value