Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Purdue

B10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 14 · Raw net 17.0 · Tempo 65.2 · 39 Division I games · Through 2026-03-28

All seasons
Record
30–9
30 wins
AdjNet
25.0β
rank 9 of 365
AdjO
126.7β
rank 1 of 365
AdjD
101.7β
rank 42 of 365
AdjT
65.6β
SOS
11.7β
rank 5 of 363
NCSOS
4.3β
WAB
9.4β
rank 5 of 363
RR
0.9β
Exp. W
29.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.124.82107.8161108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%57.61152.423251.4
TO / 100 poss.13.71715.326316.7
Offensive rebound %36.41927.13830.6
FTA / FGA %28.633725.5835.0
Shooting
3P%38.31034.119233.9
2P%57.72353.324751.7
FT%74.69972.518272.5
Style
3PA / FGA %40.243.839.5
Assists / FGM %65.657.252.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %8.86.49.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %33.836.431.4
2-pointers %50.648.648.8
Free throws %15.615.019.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.4
Top Three Share of Minutes
45%
Bench Share of Minutes
30%
Players with Logged Minutes
13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-04EvansvilleW 82–5161.8Home1–0
11-07OaklandW 87–7769.9Home2–0
11-13AlabamaW 87–8068.8Away3–0
11-16AkronW 97–7972.5Home4–0
11-20MemphisW 80–7167.5Neutral5–0
11-21Texas TechW 86–5666.4Neutral6–0
11-28Eastern Ill.W 109–6271.9Home7–0
12-02RutgersW 81–6564.9Away8–0
12-06Iowa St.L 58–8165.3Home8–1
12-10MinnesotaW 85–5765.3Home9–1
12-13MarquetteW 79–5965.1Home10–1
12-20AuburnW 88–6065.2Neutral11–1
12-29Kent St.W 101–6075.8Home12–1
01-03WisconsinW 89–7371.7Away13–1
01-07WashingtonW 81–7370.7Home14–1
01-10Penn St.W 93–8566.7Home15–1
01-14IowaW 79–7264.1Home16–1
01-17Southern CaliforniaW 69–6469.1Away17–1
01-20UCLAL 67–6958.4Away17–2
01-24IllinoisL 82–8863.3Home17–3
01-27IndianaL 67–7261.6Away17–4
02-01MarylandW 93–6364.4Away18–4
02-07OregonW 68–6466.2Home19–4
02-10NebraskaW 80–77 1OT76.0Away20–4
02-14IowaW 78–5757.8Away21–4
02-17MichiganL 80–9169.7Home21–5
02-20IndianaW 93–6463.5Home22–5
02-26Michigan St.L 74–7662.4Home22–6
03-01Ohio St.L 74–8261.5Away22–7
03-04NorthwesternW 70–6657.5Away23–7
03-07WisconsinL 93–9765.7Home23–8
03-12NorthwesternW 81–6859.4Neutral24–8
03-13NebraskaW 74–5860.5Neutral25–8
03-14UCLAW 73–6659.6Neutral26–8
03-15MichiganW 80–7262.7Neutral27–8
03-20Queens (NC)W 104–7167.5—28–8
03-22Miami (FL)W 79–6965.6—29–8
03-26TexasW 79–7760.8—30–8
03-28ArizonaL 64–7965.3—30–9

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 39 of 39 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groupsMinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Braden Smith3934:2385.7%16.64.110.32.00.23.41.8133–27149.1%64–17736.2%99–12082.5%51.1%55.6%26.8%535:02 +0:3987.6%16.2 +1.9
Fletcher Loyer3929:2573.3%19.13.22.81.00.11.41.654–11049.1%112–25943.2%104–11987.4%60.2%65.0%32.2%531:54 +2:2979.7%15.6 +1.5
Trey Kaufman-Renn3728:3267.5%19.911.73.60.50.32.03.2225–38059.2%2–1315.4%†68–10763.6%58.0%59.5%27.2%532:05 +3:3380.2%18.8 +4.6
Oscar Cluff3924:1760.5%17.512.32.90.81.51.34.5164–24068.3%0–0—86–12369.9%68.3%70.4%51.2%525:12 +0:5563.0%12.6 +2.0
C.J. Cox3924:1460.4%14.04.62.10.80.20.52.056–9260.9%62–16637.3%32–3884.2%57.8%60.1%14.7%525:15 +1:0163.1%8.6 +0.1
Gicarri Harris3915:2538.4%11.84.12.12.20.20.82.724–4949.0%33–9335.5%31–3686.1%51.8%56.4%25.4%512:45 −2:4031.9%3.0 −1.6
Jack Benter3814:3735.5%12.07.02.21.10.11.24.122–3366.7%36–8840.9%14–2360.9%†62.8%63.3%19.0%515:32 +0:5538.8%2.0 −2.4
Omer Mayer3914:1235.4%15.53.03.21.10.02.52.341–8448.8%39–11035.5%15–2365.2%†51.3%52.4%11.9%512:00 −2:1230.0%3.0 −2.5
Daniel Jacobsen3913:1633.0%16.69.11.00.23.61.75.679–11966.4%3–837.5%†47–7562.7%65.7%66.9%59.1%58:52 −4:2322.2%0.8 −4.7
Liam MurphyUnder 100 minutes127:145.5%12.95.11.40.50.00.03.72–450.0%†8–2334.8%†0–0—51.9%†51.9%†0.0%†14:01 −3:132.0%3.0 +0.7
Aaron FineFew gamesUnder 100 minutes92:171.3%21.40.05.80.00.03.97.85–1050.0%†0–0—1–250.0%†50.0%†50.6%†20.0%†————
Jack LuskFew gamesUnder 100 minutes91:491.0%0.07.40.00.00.02.57.40–0—0–0—0–0————————
Jace RaylFew gamesUnder 100 minutes81:400.9%0.00.00.00.00.00.06.00–20.0%†0–0—0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†————
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes39 games81.435.119.5not published2.88.9not published805–139457.7%359–93738.3%497–66674.6%57.6%60.7%28.6%
Sum of players81.432.519.55.52.88.614.5Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+2.70.0not published0.0+0.3not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.60M
80% Range $2.60M to $5.00M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.60M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
13
4 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Braden Smith86.0%$705K$480K to $1.00M19.2%$705K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Fletcher Loyer73.5%$650K$435K to $990K17.5%$650K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Trey Kaufman-Renn66.6%$565K$375K to $850K15.4%$565K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
C.J. Cox61.3%$495K$340K to $725K13.6%$495K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Oscar Cluff61.0%$550K$365K to $830K15.0%$550K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Gicarri Harris38.2%$99K$27K to $220K2.9%$99K in all four$27KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Omer Mayer35.4%$110K$30K to $215K3.2%$110K in all four$27KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jack Benter35.3%$140K$46K to $250K4.1%$140K in all four$27KSufficient evidence
Daniel Jacobsen33.2%$105K$29K to $205K3.0%$105K in all four$27KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Liam Murphy5.6%$27K$15K to $43K0.8%$27K in all four$27KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Aaron Fine1.5%$27K$15K to $43K0.8%$27K in all four$27KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jack Lusk1.2%$27K$15K to $43K0.8%$27K in all four$27KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jace Rayl1.0%$27K$15K to $43K0.8%$27K in all four$27KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool—$3.60M$2.60M to $5.00M100%$3.60M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Purdue University-Main Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$20,966,991
Men's basketball expenses$14,040,438
Athletics department expenses$135,140,397
Athletics department revenue$150,536,320

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 39 games, 2,552 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1565 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points81.470.3
Field goals made29.825.6
Field goals attempted59.657.1
3-pointers made9.28.5
3-pointers attempted23.925.0
Free throws made12.710.6
Free throws attempted17.014.6
Offensive rebounds11.28.9
Defensive rebounds23.919.6
Total rebounds35.128.5
Assists19.514.6
Blocks2.82.3
Turnovers8.910.0
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 214.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 566.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

39 of 39 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled3,1843,1840±15.90
Field goals madeReconciled1,1641,1640±5.80
Field goals attemptedReconciled2,3312,3310±11.70
3-pointers madeReconciled3593590±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled9379370±4.70
Free throws madeReconciled4974970±2.50
Free throws attemptedReconciled6666660±3.30
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsReconciled1,3741,270+104±109.90
AssistsReconciled7647640±3.80
BlocksReconciled1101100±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown349336+13±10.50
StealsNo team figurenot published214not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published566not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled7,8257,801+24.3±156.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Braden Smith86.0%+5.7range +4.5 to +6.6Sufficient evidence
Fletcher Loyer73.5%+6.2range +4.7 to +7.6Sufficient evidence
Trey Kaufman-Renn66.6%+5.9range +4.5 to +7.1Sufficient evidence
C.J. Cox61.3%+5.6range +4.4 to +6.7Sufficient evidence
Oscar Cluff61.0%+6.2range +4.8 to +7.6Sufficient evidence
Gicarri Harris38.2%+0.0range -1.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Omer Mayer35.4%+0.6range -0.7 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Jack Benter35.3%+1.5range +0.3 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Daniel Jacobsen33.2%+0.5range -0.9 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Liam Murphy5.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Aaron Fine1.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jack Lusk1.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jace Rayl1.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+13.6range +12.5 to +14.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 98.1% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.9%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value