Massachusetts

MAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 151 · Raw net 1.5 · Tempo 71.0 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-13

Record: 16–16; 16 wins
AdjNet: -0.9β; rank 186 of 365
AdjO: 108.3β; rank 174 of 365
AdjD: 109.2β; rank 204 of 365
AdjT: 70.6β
SOS: -2.5β; rank 244 of 363
NCSOS: -5.3β
WAB: -10.0β; rank 225 of 363
RR: -1.4β
Exp. W: 17.4β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	109.9135	108.4179	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	53.199	52.9262	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.8263	16.8167	16.7
Offensive rebound %	33.380	26.119	30.6
FTA / FGA %	37.0129	44.6348	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.2100	33.0121	33.9
2P%	53.2120	55.4316	51.7
FT%	67.3339	72.9213	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.4	42.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	58.4	58.6	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	6.8	7.7	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.5	30.6	31.4
2-pointers %	52.5	45.9	48.8
Free throws %	19.0	23.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Marshall	L 72–78	81.6	Home	0–1
11-08	UAlbany	W 83–62	74.1	Home	1–1
11-13	Le Moyne	W 94–80	76.4	Home	2–1
11-16	Central Conn. St.	W 84–77	77.8	Home	3–1
11-21	Col. of Charleston	L 65–69	68.0	Neutral	3–2
11-22	Green Bay	L 75–79	67.5	Neutral	3–3
11-24	Oregon St.	W 73–65	66.6	Neutral	4–3
12-03	Harvard	W 78–71	73.0	Home	5–3
12-06	UMass Lowell	W 80–60	76.5	Home	6–3
12-10	Boston College	W 76–74	70.5	Neutral	7–3
12-13	Florida St.	W 103–95	81.4	Neutral	8–3
12-20	Kent St.	L 59–69	70.7	Home	8–4
12-30	Eastern Mich.	L 74–80	73.0	Away	8–5
01-03	Bowling Green	L 100–101 1OT	87.0	Home	8–6
01-06	Ohio	L 83–86	74.0	Away	8–7
01-10	Ball St.	W 79–71	68.7	Home	9–7
01-13	Western Mich.	W 85–82	67.5	Away	10–7
01-17	NIU	L 68–70	72.8	Away	10–8
01-20	Toledo	W 84–82	70.7	Home	11–8
01-23	Buffalo	W 68–67	66.1	Away	12–8
01-27	Miami (OH)	L 84–86	67.1	Away	12–9
01-31	Eastern Mich.	W 70–67	65.1	Home	13–9
02-03	Central Mich.	W 95–89	69.8	Home	14–9
02-07	Coastal Carolina	L 91–94 3OT	83.8	Away	14–10
02-13	Akron	L 92–99	78.3	Away	14–11
02-17	Miami (OH)	L 77–86	70.6	Home	14–12
02-21	Buffalo	L 82–86 1OT	72.3	Home	14–13
02-24	Ball St.	L 73–74 1OT	73.5	Away	14–14
02-28	Bowling Green	L 62–81	65.6	Away	14–15
03-03	Ohio	W 94–82	76.7	Home	15–15
03-12	Miami (OH)	W 87–83	69.0	Neutral	16–15
03-13	Toledo	L 67–77	70.3	Neutral	16–16

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Marcus Banks	32	33:25	81.6%	548	85	56	39	2	44	82	71–146	48.6%	112–293	38.2%	70–84	83.3%	54.4%	57.6%	19.1%	5	34:40 +1:15	84.6%	15.2 −1.9
Leonardo Bettiol	32	28:58	70.8%	578	250	68	24	7	89	114	208–345	60.3%	1–2	50.0%†	159–227	70.0%	60.4%	64.7%	65.4%	5	27:52 −1:06	68.0%	20.2 +2.1
Danny Carbuccia	32	27:48	67.9%	215	57	202	32	2	61	76	76–154	49.4%	13–54	24.1%	24–63	38.1%	45.9%	45.6%	30.3%	5	30:48 +3:00	75.1%	10.0 +3.3
Jayden Ndjigue	32	27:08	66.3%	208	170	60	40	15	49	96	64–114	56.1%	6–25	24.0%†	62–88	70.5%	52.5%	58.5%	63.3%	5	26:44 −0:24	65.2%	7.0 +0.5
Daniel Hankins-Sanford	29	28:58	64.1%	329	205	38	19	18	39	85	113–222	50.9%	12–49	24.5%†	67–108	62.0%	48.3%	51.6%	39.9%	2	25:41 −3:17	25.1%	8.0 −3.3
K'Jei Parker	32	20:49	50.9%	350	63	62	20	0	43	64	53–105	50.5%	64–154	41.6%	52–58	89.7%	57.5%	61.5%	22.4%	5	16:35 −4:14	40.4%	5.6 −5.3
Dwayne Wimbley, Jr.	32	13:56	34.0%	69	66	16	15	12	29	41	21–54	38.9%†	6–36	16.7%†	9–16	56.3%†	33.3%†	35.6%†	17.8%†	5	24:06 +10:10	58.8%	4.8 +2.6
Luka Damjanac	29	10:00	22.1%	65	64	17	5	5	15	41	25–36	69.4%†	2–8	25.0%†	9–13	69.2%†	63.6%†	65.4%†	29.5%†	4	9:17 −0:43	18.1%	3.5 +1.3
Isaiah Placide	27	8:40	17.9%	102	25	9	5	2	8	22	6–23	26.1%†	24–57	42.1%	18–26	69.2%	52.5%†	55.8%†	32.5%†	5	16:39 +7:59	40.6%	5.6 +1.8
Dimitri Clerc	25	8:31	16.3%	78	65	3	6	5	17	35	31–51	60.8%†	0–0	—	16–38	42.1%	60.8%†	57.6%†	74.5%†	4	7:44 −0:47	15.1%	2.3 −0.9
Donovan BrownUnder 100 minutes	15	4:57	5.7%	13	6	3	4	0	5	8	2–8	25.0%†	3–10	30.0%†	0–0	—	36.1%†	36.1%†	0.0%†	2	4:36 −0:21	4.5%	0.0 −0.9
Charles OutlawFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	2:19	1.2%	2	4	0	1	2	2	6	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	33.3%†	29.1%†	33.3%†	2	4:24 +2:05	4.3%	1.0 +0.7
Rollie CastineyraFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	3:05	0.7%	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	32 games			2557	1171	534	not published	71	415	not published	671–1261	53.2%	243–690	35.2%	486–722	67.3%	53.1%	56.4%	37.0%
Sum of players				2557	1060	534	211	70	401	671	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+111	0	not published	+1	+14	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $365K; 80% Range $135K to $965K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $360K to $375K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Marcus Banks	82.0%	$39K	$6K to $125K	13.4%	$39K to $40K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Leonardo Bettiol	71.4%	$97K	$31K to $290K	24.7%	$96K to $100K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Danny Carbuccia	69.4%	$41K	$9K to $125K	13.1%	$40K to $42K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jayden Ndjigue	65.7%	$83K	$27K to $245K	21.1%	$82K to $85K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Daniel Hankins-Sanford	64.2%	$20K	$2K to $77K	7.4%	$19K to $20K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
K'Jei Parker	50.3%	$16K	$2K to $63K	5.9%	$15K to $16K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dwayne Wimbley, Jr.	34.5%	$6K	$1K to $28K	1.3%	$6K in all four	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Luka Damjanac	21.3%	$8K	$2K to $28K	2.7%	$8K in all four	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Placide	17.7%	$6K	$1K to $21K	1.8%	$6K in all four	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dimitri Clerc	16.6%	$8K	$2K to $25K	2.5%	$7K to $8K	$3K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Donovan Brown	5.0%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.8%	$3K in all four	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Charles Outlaw	1.3%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.8%	$3K in all four	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Rollie Castineyra	0.6%	$3K	$1K to $8K	0.8%	$3K in all four	$3K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$365K	$135K to $965K	100%	$360K to $375K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Massachusetts-Amherst (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$6,221,448	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$6,221,448
Athletics department expenses	$57,654,295
Athletics department revenue	$57,654,295

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 32 games, 2,326 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,557	2,522
Field goals made	914	836
Field goals attempted	1,951	1,824
3-pointers made	243	257
3-pointers attempted	690	779
Free throws made	486	593
Free throws attempted	722	813
Offensive rebounds	377	281
Defensive rebounds	794	755
Total rebounds	1,171	1,036
Assists	534	490
Blocks	71	97
Turnovers	415	391
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 211.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 671.
Minutes (derived)	6,550	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,557	2,557	0	±12.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	914	914	0	±4.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,951	1,951	0	±9.8	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	243	243	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	690	690	0	±3.5	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	486	486	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	722	722	0	±3.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,171	1,060	+111	±93.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	534	534	0	±2.7	0
Blocks	Reconciled	71	70	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	415	401	+14	±12.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	211	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	671	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,550	6,543	+6.9	±131.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Marcus Banks	82.0%	+0.4range -0.8 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Leonardo Bettiol	71.4%	+3.5range +2.0 to +4.8Sufficient evidence
Danny Carbuccia	69.4%	+0.8range -0.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Jayden Ndjigue	65.7%	+3.0range +2.0 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Daniel Hankins-Sanford	64.2%	-0.6range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
K'Jei Parker	50.3%	-0.6range -1.9 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Dwayne Wimbley, Jr.	34.5%	-2.6range -4.0 to -1.5Sufficient evidence
Luka Damjanac	21.3%	-0.9range -2.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Placide	17.7%	-1.7range -2.7 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Dimitri Clerc	16.6%	-0.5range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Donovan Brown	5.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Charles Outlaw	1.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Rollie Castineyra	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.0range +9.2 to +10.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.6% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value