Jayden Ndjigue
Massachusetts · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
868:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 27:08
- Points per game
- 6.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.3 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.5 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.6 | 7.8 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 4.4 |
| Season totals | 208 | 170 | 60 | 40 | 15 | 49 | 96 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 70–139 | 50.4% | 4.3 | 6.4 |
| 2P | 64–114 | 56.1% | 3.6 | 5.3 |
| 3P | 6–25 | 24.0%† | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| FT | 62–88 | 70.5% | 2.8 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.5% | 58.5% | 18.0% | 63.3% | 1.22 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Massachusetts · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $83K
- 80% range $27K to $245K
- Median share of team pool
- 21.1%
- team pool $365K, 80% range $135K to $965K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $82K to $85K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $3K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 65.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Massachusetts: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Massachusetts | $83Kspeculative | $27K to $245K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.0 | +2.0 to +4.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | +3.0 | +6.2range +5.6 to +6.9 | 2,769 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Massachusetts | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.0 | -0.4 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +1.8 | +3.2range +2.7 to +3.8 | 2,692 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Massachusetts | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.6 | +0.4 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +0.7 | +3.2range +2.6 to +4.0 | 1,893 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:44 | 27:08 | 13:24–35:59 | |
| Points | 7.0 | 6.5 | 0.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 35.7% | 52.5% | 0.0%–116.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Toledo | L 67–77 | 27:11 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | Miami (OH) | W 87–83 | 33:31 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 70.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Ohio | W 94–82 | 32:48 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Bowling Green | L 62–81 | 19:49 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Ball St. | L 73–74 | 20:20 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Buffalo | L 82–86 | 25:58 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-17 | Miami (OH) | L 77–86 | 13:24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-13 | Akron | L 92–99 | 28:59 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Coastal Carolina | L 91–94 | 30:25 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Central Mich. | W 95–89 | 32:08 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Eastern Mich. | W 70–67 | 32:05 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 9-10 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-27 | Miami (OH) | L 84–86 | 20:04 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 116.7% |
| 2026-01-23 | Buffalo | W 68–67 | 23:09 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Toledo | W 84–82 | 30:45 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | NIU | L 68–70 | 23:52 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Western Mich. | W 85–82 | 17:57 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-10 | Ball St. | W 79–71 | 27:13 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Ohio | L 83–86 | 21:31 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Bowling Green | L 100–101 | 28:05 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Eastern Mich. | L 74–80 | 24:14 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Kent St. | L 59–69 | 30:31 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Florida St. | W 103–95 | 18:36 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2025-12-10 | Boston College | W 76–74 | 35:59 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | UMass Lowell | W 80–60 | 25:12 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-03 | Harvard | W 78–71 | 34:57 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Oregon St. | W 73–65 | 23:41 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Green Bay | L 75–79 | 30:42 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Col. of Charleston | L 65–69 | 30:33 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-16 | Central Conn. St. | W 84–77 | 25:44 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | Le Moyne | W 94–80 | 33:22 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | UAlbany | W 83–62 | 33:09 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Marshall | L 72–78 | 32:06 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 25.0% |