Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Alcorn

SWAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 355 · Raw net -19.1 · Tempo 69.4 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-10

All seasons
Record
9–23
9 wins
AdjNet
-19.7β
rank 356 of 365
AdjO
96.7β
rank 354 of 365
AdjD
116.4β
rank 338 of 365
AdjT
68.7β
SOS
-4.2β
rank 299 of 363
NCSOS
11.4β
WAB
-16.6β
rank 337 of 363
RR
1.7β
Exp. W
7.3β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.96.0353115.1324108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%47.732055.033151.4
TO / 100 poss.19.633918.19216.7
Offensive rebound %26.929735.534730.6
FTA / FGA %31.825939.429335.0
Shooting
3P%33.320733.012033.9
2P%46.534458.035151.7
FT%70.824472.719772.5
Style
3PA / FGA %33.735.139.5
Assists / FGM %46.555.852.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %9.111.19.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %28.625.031.4
2-pointers %52.354.348.8
Free throws %19.120.719.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes
42%
Bench Share of Minutes
31%
Players with Logged Minutes
11

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-04Florida St.L 76–10875.8Away0–1
11-06South AlabamaL 70–7672.0Away0–2
11-08MinnesotaL 50–9569.8Away0–3
11-11MarylandL 64–8472.0Away0–4
11-13HowardL 64–7266.9Away0–5
11-18LSUL 81–10772.9Away0–6
11-23OklahomaL 53–7268.5Away0–7
11-28Indiana St.W 81–7479.7Neutral1–7
11-29Louisiana TechL 58–8363.1Away1–8
12-03Iowa St.L 68–13280.3Away1–9
12-19BaylorL 56–11378.1Away1–10
12-29Ole MissL 43–7967.0Away1–11
01-03Jackson St.L 86–8970.1Away1–12
01-10Alabama A&MW 64–6264.6Away2–12
01-12Alabama St.L 66–8171.5Away2–13
01-17Texas SouthernL 71–7264.8Home2–14
01-19Prairie ViewW 76–7569.8Home3–14
01-24Florida A&ML 58–6666.4Away3–15
01-26Bethune-CookmanL 73–8270.5Away3–16
01-31Southern U.W 78–7365.0Home4–16
02-02GramblingL 50–7462.9Home4–17
02-07Ark.-Pine BluffL 77–8466.3Away4–18
02-09Mississippi Val.W 74–6658.7Away5–18
02-14Bethune-CookmanW 57–5563.8Home6–18
02-16Florida A&ML 78–8671.6Home6–19
02-21Jackson St.W 83–6571.7Home7–19
02-26Texas SouthernL 87–92 1OT79.6Away7–20
02-28Prairie ViewL 51–7270.4Away7–21
03-03Mississippi Val.W 67–6464.6Home8–21
03-05Ark.-Pine BluffL 48–8374.4Home8–22
03-09Alabama St.W 77–6570.4Neutral9–22
03-10Prairie ViewL 56–6566.5Neutral9–23

Roster · 11 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groupsMinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Shane Lancaster3228:4071.4%15.13.33.11.40.41.72.749–12040.8%61–14243.0%66–9172.5%53.6%57.4%34.7%532:38 +3:5881.6%6.2 −4.6
Nick Woodard3228:3371.1%12.05.91.80.70.82.23.271–15246.7%32–10430.8%37–6061.7%46.5%48.7%23.4%527:27 −1:0668.6%6.8 −1.8
Jameel Morris3029:2668.7%15.23.43.92.90.23.03.9102–20350.2%20–6929.0%71–9078.9%48.5%53.8%33.1%335:01 +5:3552.5%19.0 +7.8
Tycen McDaniels3227:2568.3%17.58.91.52.01.83.84.4138–25953.3%2–825.0%†101–13475.4%52.8%58.7%50.2%533:13 +5:4883.1%15.8 +3.8
Davian Williams3226:2165.6%11.84.42.02.00.12.42.649–12339.8%39–12032.5%34–5068.0%44.2%47.0%20.6%524:59 −1:2262.5%4.0 −3.8
Omari Hamilton3221:1452.9%14.78.40.90.90.32.23.172–15347.1%17–4835.4%†55–7969.6%48.5%53.0%39.3%536:24 +15:1091.0%12.6 +4.8
Travis Roberts3116:2639.7%8.74.10.90.80.41.32.017–4537.8%23–7929.1%8–1650.0%†41.5%42.4%12.9%418:32 +2:0637.1%1.8 −1.8
Bryson Calamese3111:0026.5%11.03.24.21.90.23.96.024–6536.9%†8–2828.6%†22–3073.3%38.7%†44.3%†32.3%†58:03 −2:5720.1%1.2 −1.8
Mike Jones1314:3514.8%9.59.33.01.31.33.25.517–3745.9%†1–911.1%†8–1747.1%†40.2%†42.1%†37.0%†————
Jeremy Ellis226:0110.3%7.05.70.90.63.01.55.79–2142.9%†0–0—5–683.3%†42.9%†48.6%†28.6%†22:38 −3:222.6%1.0 0.0
William Henderson1110:569.4%9.66.00.30.72.33.76.012–2744.4%†1–520.0%†2–540.0%†42.2%†42.4%†15.6%†————
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes32 games66.630.011.1not published3.413.6not published560–120546.5%204–61233.3%409–57870.8%47.7%51.7%31.8%
Sum of players66.627.211.17.73.412.717.6Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+2.9−0.0not published0.0+0.9not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$155K
80% Range $59K to $410K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$145K to $180K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
11

The widest scenario range, $67K to $475K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Shane Lancaster72.9%$13K$1K to $56K13.8%$12K to $15K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nick Woodard71.2%$5K$1K to $29K4.8%$5K to $6K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tycen McDaniels68.8%$16K$1K to $64K13.9%$14K to $18K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jameel Morris68.1%$36K$7K to $145K19.6%$33K to $41K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Davian Williams65.4%$5K$1K to $29K4.6%$5K to $6K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Omari Hamilton53.2%$21K$2K to $99K13.5%$20K to $25K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Travis Roberts39.4%$3K$1K to $14K1.7%$3K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bryson Calamese27.6%$4K$1K to $19K3.8%$4K to $5K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mike Jones14.1%$3K$1K to $10K2.4%$3K in all four$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jeremy Ellis10.0%$3K$1K to $10K2.5%$3K in all four$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
William Henderson9.2%$2K$1K to $8K1.9%$2K to $3K$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$155K$59K to $410K100%$145K to $180K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Alcorn State University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$1,386,731Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$1,386,731
Athletics department expenses$10,509,725
Athletics department revenue$10,509,725

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 32 games, 2,230 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1285 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points66.679.9
Field goals made23.828.4
Field goals attempted56.657.6
3-pointers made6.46.7
3-pointers attempted19.120.2
Free throws made12.716.5
Free throws attempted18.022.7
Offensive rebounds9.411.4
Defensive rebounds20.725.4
Total rebounds30.036.8
Assists11.115.8
Blocks3.44.2
Turnovers13.612.5
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 246.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 565.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,1412,1410±10.70
Field goals madeReconciled7647640±3.80
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,8171,8170±9.10
3-pointers madeReconciled2042040±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6126120±3.10
Free throws madeReconciled4094090±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5785780±2.90
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown965873+92±77.20
AssistsReconciled355356−1±2.00
BlocksReconciled1091090±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown436408+28±13.10
StealsNo team figurenot published246not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published565not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,4256,407+18.1±128.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Shane Lancaster72.9%-1.7range -2.8 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Nick Woodard71.2%-4.0range -5.2 to -2.9Sufficient evidence
Tycen McDaniels68.8%-1.4range -2.5 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Jameel Morris68.1%-0.5range -1.4 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Davian Williams65.4%-3.7range -5.2 to -2.3Sufficient evidence
Omari Hamilton53.2%-0.7range -2.1 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Travis Roberts39.4%-5.0range -6.8 to -3.5Sufficient evidence
Bryson Calamese27.6%-2.6range -4.1 to -1.3Sufficient evidence
Mike Jones14.1%-2.6range -3.9 to -1.5Limited evidence
Jeremy Ellis10.0%-1.8range -2.6 to -1.0Limited evidence
William Henderson9.2%-2.6range -3.5 to -1.7Limited evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+7.1range +6.1 to +8.2Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 100.0% of on-court time. 0 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 6.7%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value