Houston

B12 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 6 · Raw net 22.4 · Tempo 64.8 · 37 Division I games · Through 2026-03-26

Record: 30–7; 30 wins
AdjNet: 27.5β; rank 6 of 365
AdjO: 120.3β; rank 15 of 365
AdjD: 92.9β; rank 4 of 365
AdjT: 64.7β
SOS: 9.3β; rank 22 of 363
NCSOS: -0.6β
WAB: 8.9β; rank 6 of 363
RR: -0.2β
Exp. W: 30.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	118.333	95.95	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.9151	46.212	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	12.83	20.614	16.7
Offensive rebound %	35.732	30.3172	30.6
FTA / FGA %	26.3355	38.7279	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.7134	31.649	33.9
2P%	51.7179	45.39	51.7
FT%	77.328	69.534	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	40.7	41.5	39.5
Assists / FGM %	52.6	53.5	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	12.5	6.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	34.2	33.0	31.4
2-pointers %	49.4	44.4	48.8
Free throws %	16.4	22.5	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 47%
Bench Share of Minutes: 29%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Lehigh	W 75–57	68.2	Home	1–0
11-08	Towson	W 65–48	65.0	Home	2–0
11-12	Oakland	W 78–45	62.0	Home	3–0
11-16	Auburn	W 73–72	66.7	Neutral	4–0
11-20	Rider	W 91–45	67.3	Home	5–0
11-24	Syracuse	W 78–74 1OT	75.3	Neutral	6–0
11-25	Tennessee	L 73–76	60.5	Neutral	6–1
11-26	Notre Dame	W 66–56	59.0	Neutral	7–1
12-06	Florida St.	W 82–67	69.4	Neutral	8–1
12-10	Jackson St.	W 80–38	64.3	Home	9–1
12-13	LSU New Orleans	W 99–57	67.8	Home	10–1
12-20	Arkansas	W 94–85	73.3	Neutral	11–1
12-29	Middle Tenn.	W 69–60	59.5	Home	12–1
01-03	Cincinnati	W 67–60	63.9	Away	13–1
01-06	Texas Tech	W 69–65	66.3	Home	14–1
01-10	Baylor	W 77–55	62.0	Away	15–1
01-13	West Virginia	W 77–48	61.4	Home	16–1
01-18	Arizona St.	W 103–73	70.6	Home	17–1
01-24	Texas Tech	L 86–90	65.1	Away	17–2
01-28	TCU	W 79–70	70.1	Away	18–2
01-31	Cincinnati	W 76–54	59.4	Home	19–2
02-04	UCF	W 79–55	61.6	Home	20–2
02-07	BYU	W 77–66	58.7	Away	21–2
02-10	Utah	W 66–52	58.7	Away	22–2
02-14	Kansas St.	W 78–64	75.6	Home	23–2
02-16	Iowa St.	L 67–70	58.3	Away	23–3
02-21	Arizona	L 66–73	64.6	Home	23–4
02-23	Kansas	L 56–69	64.9	Away	23–5
02-28	Colorado	W 102–62	69.1	Home	24–5
03-04	Baylor	W 77–64	65.2	Home	25–5
03-07	Oklahoma St.	W 82–75	66.9	Away	26–5
03-12	BYU	W 73–66	69.3	Neutral	27–5
03-13	Kansas	W 69–47	59.3	Neutral	28–5
03-14	Arizona	L 74–79	65.7	Neutral	28–6
03-19	Idaho	W 78–47	65.7	—	29–6
03-21	Texas A&M	W 88–57	65.5	—	30–6
03-26	Illinois	L 55–65	58.5	—	30–7

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 37 of 37 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Milos Uzan	37	32:29	80.9%	411	99	148	36	5	48	52	76–179	42.5%	72–210	34.3%	43–58	74.1%	47.3%	49.6%	14.9%	5	32:11 −0:18	80.5%	9.4 −1.7
Kingston Flemings	37	31:38	78.8%	594	150	192	56	12	66	74	181–360	50.3%	41–106	38.7%	109–129	84.5%	52.0%	56.8%	27.7%	5	32:03 +0:25	80.1%	13.4 −2.7
Emanuel Sharp	37	29:28	73.4%	572	110	64	44	3	36	112	79–165	47.9%	97–261	37.2%	123–138	89.1%	52.7%	58.8%	32.4%	5	28:48 −0:40	72.0%	14.0 −1.5
Chris Cenac Jr	37	24:57	62.2%	352	291	27	28	18	33	86	113–205	55.1%	30–90	33.3%	36–58	62.1%	53.6%	54.9%	19.7%	5	24:38 −0:19	61.6%	10.4 +0.9
Joseph Tugler	37	23:45	59.2%	312	195	49	47	55	47	112	128–223	57.4%	1–1	100.0%†	53–75	70.7%	57.8%	60.7%	33.5%	5	26:36 +2:51	66.5%	10.2 +1.8
Isiah Harwell	32	13:43	29.6%	114	65	17	19	8	10	38	13–44	29.5%	23–85	27.1%	19–31	61.3%	36.8%	40.0%	24.0%	3	4:08 −9:35	6.2%	0.0 −3.6
Kalifa Sakho	34	12:52	29.5%	82	89	3	7	20	14	59	33–40	82.5%†	0–0	—	16–27	59.3%	82.5%†	79.0%†	67.5%†	5	12:25 −0:27	31.1%	1.2 −1.2
Mercy Miller	36	11:47	28.6%	181	65	17	22	6	10	42	50–89	56.2%	17–50	34.0%	30–41	73.2%	54.3%	57.6%	29.5%	5	19:54 +8:07	49.8%	8.2 +3.2
Chase McCarty	35	12:07	28.6%	144	86	6	13	10	8	46	13–20	65.0%	34–95	35.8%	16–18	88.9%†	55.7%	58.6%	15.7%	5	15:11 +3:04	38.0%	5.4 +1.3
Ramon Walker Jr.	29	10:44	20.9%	68	55	15	5	2	8	24	11–24	45.8%†	9–34	26.5%†	19–25	76.0%	42.2%†	49.3%†	43.1%†	3	6:03 −4:41	9.1%	1.0 −1.3
Cedric LathUnder 100 minutes	21	3:42	5.2%	10	14	1	1	2	1	15	4–6	66.7%†	0–0	—	2–2	100.0%†	66.7%†	72.7%†	33.3%†	3	2:10 −1:32	3.2%	0.0 −0.5
Kordel JeffersonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	3:55	0.8%	4	2	1	0	0	1	3	2–3	66.7%†	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	40.0%†	40.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Jacob McFarlandFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	2:21	0.6%	0	3	0	1	0	0	1	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	100.0%†	1	1:11 −1:10	0.6%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · season totals	37 games			2844	1371	540	not published	141	308	not published	703–1359	51.7%	324–934	34.7%	466–603	77.3%	51.9%	55.6%	26.3%
Sum of players				2844	1224	540	279	141	282	664	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+147	0	not published	0	+26	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Milos Uzan	81.9%	$665K	$450K to $985K	18.2%	$665K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Kingston Flemings	80.3%	$545K	$355K to $805K	15.5%	$545K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Emanuel Sharp	75.0%	$650K	$445K to $980K	17.8%	$650K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Chris Cenac Jr	63.3%	$485K	$330K to $710K	13.4%	$485K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Joseph Tugler	59.8%	$505K	$340K to $785K	13.9%	$505K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Kalifa Sakho	29.9%	$130K	$52K to $220K	3.9%	$130K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Chase McCarty	28.4%	$145K	$66K to $230K	4.3%	$145K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Isiah Harwell	28.1%	$135K	$60K to $215K	3.9%	$135K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Mercy Miller	27.5%	$82K	$27K to $165K	2.4%	$82K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ramon Walker Jr.	20.4%	$71K	$27K to $130K	2.1%	$71K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Cedric Lath	4.2%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Kordel Jefferson	0.8%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jacob McFarland	0.4%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Houston (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$14,577,598	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$14,577,598
Athletics department expenses	$100,162,965
Athletics department revenue	$100,162,965

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 37 games, 2,404 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,844	2,306
Field goals made	1,027	766
Field goals attempted	2,293	1,934
3-pointers made	324	254
3-pointers attempted	934	803
Free throws made	466	520
Free throws attempted	603	748
Offensive rebounds	473	390
Defensive rebounds	898	853
Total rebounds	1,371	1,243
Assists	540	410
Blocks	141	87
Turnovers	308	495
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 279.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 664.
Minutes (derived)	7,425	not published

37 of 37 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,844	2,844	0	±14.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,027	1,027	0	±5.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,293	2,293	0	±11.5	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	324	324	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	934	934	0	±4.7	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	466	466	0	±2.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	603	603	0	±3.0	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,371	1,224	+147	±109.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	540	540	0	±2.7	0
Blocks	Reconciled	141	141	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	308	282	+26	±9.2	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	279	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	664	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,425	7,400	+25.0	±148.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Milos Uzan	81.9%	+5.9range +4.5 to +7.1Sufficient evidence
Kingston Flemings	80.3%	+4.8range +3.7 to +5.9Sufficient evidence
Emanuel Sharp	75.0%	+6.2range +5.0 to +7.3Sufficient evidence
Chris Cenac Jr	63.3%	+5.4range +4.2 to +6.7Sufficient evidence
Joseph Tugler	59.8%	+6.2range +4.6 to +7.4Sufficient evidence
Kalifa Sakho	29.9%	+2.0range +0.8 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Chase McCarty	28.4%	+2.6range +1.3 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
Isiah Harwell	28.1%	+2.3range +1.3 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Mercy Miller	27.5%	+0.4range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Ramon Walker Jr.	20.4%	+0.5range -0.4 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Cedric Lath	4.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Kordel Jefferson	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jacob McFarland	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +13.9range +12.9 to +14.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.9% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value