Po'Boigh King
Sam Houston · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
812:33 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 29:01
- Points per game
- 14.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.8 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 402 | 57 | 44 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 43 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 132–313 | 42.2% | 11.2 | 15.4 |
| 2P | 68–145 | 46.9% | 5.2 | 7.1 |
| 3P | 64–168 | 38.1% | 6.0 | 8.3 |
| FT | 74–87 | 85.1% | 3.1 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.4% | 57.2% | 53.7% | 27.8% | 1.76 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Sam Houston St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $13K
- 80% range $2K to $55K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.0%
- team pool $265K, 80% range $96K to $730K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $11K to $14K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 66.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Sam Houston St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Sam Houston St | $13Kspeculative | $2K to $55K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.6 | -1.8 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -1.8 | +4.5range +3.7 to +5.3 | 2,907 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | NC Central | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.0 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.7 | +3.1range +2.6 to +3.8 | 2,916 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | NC Central | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.6 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.1 | +2.8range +2.0 to +3.6 | 1,784 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 24:17 | 29:01 | 6:51–38:16 | |
| Points | 12.6 | 14.4 | 2.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.5% | 51.3% | 0.0%–121.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-18 | New Mexico | L 83–107 | 6:51 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | New Mexico St. | W 69–61 | 24:24 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-28 | Missouri St. | W 86–81 | 35:18 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-15 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 43.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | FIU | W 100–67 | 21:16 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-7 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 121.4% |
| 2026-02-21 | Jacksonville St. | W 82–78 | 33:36 | 19 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 3-7 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Middle Tenn. | W 78–70 | 34:35 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-12 | 1-4 | 5-5 | 29.2% |
| 2026-02-14 | Kennesaw St. | W 83–79 | 33:05 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-8 | 1-2 | 7-8 | 81.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Louisiana Tech | L 78–87 | 32:19 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-18 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-04 | UTEP | W 70–66 | 35:44 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-17 | 2-10 | 9-10 | 23.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Louisiana Tech | W 83–67 | 21:44 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-11 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | Missouri St. | W 80–71 | 28:02 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-4 | 1-1 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Western Ky. | W 73–58 | 30:48 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-16 | 4-6 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Kennesaw St. | W 93–87 | 33:07 | 23 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-15 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 63.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | FIU | W 76–63 | 23:47 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5-11 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-14 | Jacksonville St. | W 77–62 | 26:26 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-12 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Liberty | L 74–82 | 38:16 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-08 | Delaware | W 72–60 | 33:50 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-18 | 5-13 | 3-3 | 52.8% |
| 2026-01-04 | Middle Tenn. | L 67–68 | 30:51 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Western Ky. | L 91–102 | 34:35 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-18 | 3-9 | 4-6 | 47.2% |
| 2025-12-21 | New Mexico St. | L 78–87 | 27:59 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 68.2% |
| 2025-12-17 | Oregon St. | W 85–75 | 34:10 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-11 | 3-7 | 3-3 | 68.2% |
| 2025-12-06 | Texas Southern | W 82–70 | 28:42 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-11 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 45.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | Oklahoma St. | L 83–93 | 31:22 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-13 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 76.9% |
| 2025-11-28 | Idaho | W 94–68 | 19:57 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-26 | Idaho St. | W 84–81 | 28:20 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-19 | Wyoming | W 78–70 | 28:13 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Utah | L 79–85 | 27:04 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Texas Tech | L 77–98 | 28:12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 35.7% |