Kashie Natt
Sam Houston · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
844:45 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 27:15
- Points per game
- 11.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 8.2 / 2.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.3 | 8.2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.6 | 12.0 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 350 | 253 | 76 | 63 | 14 | 39 | 81 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 110–251 | 43.8% | 8.1 | 11.9 |
| 2P | 80–175 | 45.7% | 5.6 | 8.3 |
| 3P | 30–76 | 39.5% | 2.5 | 3.6 |
| FT | 100–128 | 78.1% | 4.1 | 6.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.8% | 56.9% | 30.3% | 51.0% | 1.95 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Sam Houston St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $58K
- 80% range $18K to $175K
- Median share of team pool
- 20.5%
- team pool $265K, 80% range $96K to $730K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $49K to $63K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 68.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Sam Houston St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Sam Houston St | $58Kspeculative | $18K to $175K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.4 | +1.9 to +4.7 | Sufficient evidence | +3.0 | +0.4 | +6.7range +5.9 to +7.5 | 3,017 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:02 | 27:15 | 17:23–38:16 | |
| Points | 11.6 | 11.3 | 0.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 38.7% | 49.7% | 0.0%–110.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-18 | New Mexico | L 83–107 | 28:21 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-12 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-03-13 | Kennesaw St. | L 73–79 | 38:16 | 13 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 45.8% |
| 2026-03-11 | New Mexico St. | W 69–61 | 35:00 | 17 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-14 | 1-4 | 4-6 | 46.4% |
| 2026-03-07 | Liberty | L 72–79 | 33:51 | 11 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 38.9% |
| 2026-03-05 | Delaware | L 80–83 | 34:40 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-13 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Missouri St. | W 86–81 | 17:42 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | FIU | W 100–67 | 32:23 | 18 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Jacksonville St. | W 82–78 | 34:56 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 7-8 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-18 | Middle Tenn. | W 78–70 | 22:32 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Kennesaw St. | W 83–79 | 25:46 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 7-8 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Louisiana Tech | L 78–87 | 23:38 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | UTEP | W 70–66 | 23:56 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 8-8 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Louisiana Tech | W 83–67 | 30:31 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-28 | Missouri St. | W 80–71 | 32:35 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Western Ky. | W 73–58 | 28:55 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 110.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Kennesaw St. | W 93–87 | 24:57 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-9 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-17 | FIU | W 76–63 | 20:53 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Jacksonville St. | W 77–62 | 31:41 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Liberty | L 74–82 | 30:14 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7-14 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-08 | Delaware | W 72–60 | 17:23 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-04 | Middle Tenn. | L 67–68 | 20:53 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Western Ky. | L 91–102 | 28:44 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | New Mexico St. | L 78–87 | 27:13 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 7-8 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-17 | Oregon St. | W 85–75 | 26:48 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-8 | 3-3 | 6-8 | 81.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Texas Southern | W 82–70 | 21:33 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7-9 | 2-3 | 6-6 | 88.9% |
| 2025-12-02 | Oklahoma St. | L 83–93 | 28:06 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Idaho | W 94–68 | 22:44 | 4 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Idaho St. | W 84–81 | 30:00 | 26 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-11 | 0-1 | 12-14 | 63.6% |
| 2025-11-19 | Wyoming | W 78–70 | 24:33 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-15 | Utah | L 79–85 | 23:23 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Texas Tech | L 77–98 | 22:38 | 16 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6-10 | 2-2 | 2-4 | 70.0% |