Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Penn St.

B10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 291 · Raw net -8.4 · Tempo 67.5 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-10

All seasons
Record
12–20
12 wins
AdjNet
-0.8β
rank 184 of 365
AdjO
111.4β
rank 106 of 365
AdjD
112.3β
rank 274 of 365
AdjT
68.4β
SOS
7.4β
rank 47 of 363
NCSOS
-6.2β
WAB
-7.9β
rank 178 of 363
RR
1.2β
Exp. W
10.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.109.2148117.6345108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%53.010258.436351.4
TO / 100 poss.15.611017.711316.7
Offensive rebound %25.932531.121230.6
FTA / FGA %33.821927.52835.0
Shooting
3P%32.426438.836333.9
2P%55.84658.635751.7
FT%75.08376.935772.5
Style
3PA / FGA %38.143.439.5
Assists / FGM %48.360.452.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %5.29.89.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %28.136.631.4
2-pointers %52.648.148.8
Free throws %19.315.319.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.9
Top Three Share of Minutes
42%
Bench Share of Minutes
34%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03FairfieldW 76–6869.1Home1–0
11-08New HavenW 87–4362.2Away2–0
11-11NavyW 80–7168.6Home3–0
11-15La SalleW 83–6963.7Neutral4–0
11-19HarvardW 84–8063.8Home5–0
11-22ProvidenceL 65–7770.3Neutral5–1
11-25Boston U.W 96–8763.6Home6–1
11-29Sacred HeartW 90–5977.5Home7–1
12-02CampbellW 87–7673.0Home8–1
12-09IndianaL 72–11373.3Away8–2
12-13Michigan St.L 72–7669.1Home8–3
12-21PittsburghL 46–8065.0Neutral8–4
12-29N.C. CentralW 90–6768.3Home9–4
01-03IllinoisL 65–7367.5Home9–5
01-06MichiganL 72–7471.5Home9–6
01-10PurdueL 85–9366.7Away9–7
01-14UCLAL 60–7160.0Home9–8
01-18MarylandL 73–9665.5Away9–9
01-22WisconsinL 71–9871.0Home9–10
01-26Ohio St.L 78–8468.5Away9–11
01-29NorthwesternL 73–9467.9Away9–12
02-01MinnesotaW 77–7563.7Home10–12
02-05MichiganL 69–11071.2Away10–13
02-08Southern CaliforniaL 75–7772.3Home10–14
02-11WashingtonW 63–6065.4Away11–14
02-14OregonL 72–8365.6Away11–15
02-18RutgersL 72–8568.2Home11–16
02-21NebraskaL 64–8769.4Away11–17
02-28IowaW 71–6959.4Home12–17
03-04Ohio St.L 62–9464.8Home12–18
03-08RutgersL 62–7469.3Away12–19
03-10NorthwesternL 66–7663.6Neutral12–20

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groupsMinutesSeason TotalsShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Josh Reed3228:1370.5%36713133333355188–15955.3%32–8736.8%95–10987.2%55.3%62.4%44.3%531:40 +3:2879.2%13.0 +1.5
Kayden Mingo2832:0070.0%383981215855753123–21656.9%21–8624.4%74–10570.5%51.2%55.0%34.8%433:59 +2:0068.0%12.0 −1.7
Freddie Dilione V3227:1768.2%448102713964742132–23655.9%42–13231.8%58–7181.7%53.0%56.1%19.3%527:58 +0:4169.9%12.6 −1.4
Ivan Juric3026:2161.8%30515824127589194–13669.1%15–5328.3%72–10966.1%61.6%64.4%57.7%527:06 +0:4567.7%15.4 +5.2
Dominick Stewart3222:2756.1%2117052227267630–6050.0%39–11234.8%34–4379.1%51.5%55.3%25.0%529:31 +7:0473.8%5.0 −1.6
Melih Tunca3122:4054.9%2436273226433363–12152.1%20–6431.3%57–7477.0%50.3%55.8%40.0%417:58 −4:4135.9%5.3 −2.6
Eli Rice2919:4544.7%195487185184419–5137.3%41–10539.0%34–4477.3%51.6%55.6%28.2%416:14 −3:3132.5%0.5 −6.2
Mason Blackwood2612:0124.4%674665182821–2875.0%†6–2722.2%†7–977.8%†54.5%†56.8%†16.4%†517:00 +4:5942.5%2.4 −0.2
Sasa Ciani289:5821.8%5853635112920–4940.8%†1–520.0%†15–2268.2%†39.8%†45.5%†40.7%†57:37 −2:2119.0%1.2 −0.9
Tibor Mirtic1514:0516.5%55501081112324–4454.5%†1–333.3%†4–1330.8%†54.3%†52.2%†27.7%†————
Justin Houser186:068.6%26203286246–1250.0%†3–933.3%†5–862.5%†50.0%†53.0%†38.1%†35:51 −0:158.8%2.0 +0.6
Chris LotitoFew gamesUnder 100 minutes41:290.5%01000120–0—0–0—0–0————————
Team, games with logs · season totals32 games2358927406not published54337not published620–111255.8%221–68332.4%455–60775.0%53.0%57.2%33.8%
Sum of players235883940622254321496Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0+880not published0+16not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.60M
80% Range $2.60M to $4.90M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.60M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
1 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Josh Reed71.0%$470K$44K to $925K13.6%$470K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kayden Mingo70.7%$325K$27K to $640K10.1%$325K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Freddie Dilione V68.2%$465K$38K to $950K13.5%$465K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ivan Juric62.0%$365K$35K to $700K10.9%$365K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dominick Stewart56.1%$365K$42K to $775K10.7%$365K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Melih Tunca54.3%$425K$60K to $870K11.8%$425K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eli Rice45.3%$320K$41K to $690K9.2%$320K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mason Blackwood25.4%$66K$20K to $180K1.7%$66K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Sasa Ciani21.5%$165K$45K to $325K4.7%$165K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tibor Mirtic16.1%$155K$71K to $360K4.2%$155K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Justin Houser9.0%$61K$24K to $110K1.9%$61K in all four$29KLimited evidence
Chris Lotito0.5%$29K$16K to $47K0.8%$29K in all four$29KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool—$3.60M$2.60M to $4.90M100%$3.60M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$15,174,250
Men's basketball expenses$14,434,548
Athletics department expenses$231,709,762
Athletics department revenue$254,397,122

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 32 games, 2,159 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points2,3582,539
Field goals made841920
Field goals attempted1,7951,840
3-pointers made221310
3-pointers attempted683799
Free throws made455389
Free throws attempted607506
Offensive rebounds266299
Defensive rebounds661760
Total rebounds9271,059
Assists406556
Blocks54109
Turnovers337382
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 222.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 496.
Minutes (derived)6,400not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3582,3580±11.80
Field goals madeReconciled8418410±4.20
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7951,7950±9.00
3-pointers madeReconciled2212210±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6836830±3.40
Free throws madeReconciled4554550±2.30
Free throws attemptedReconciled6076070±3.00
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown927839+88±74.20
AssistsReconciled4064060±2.00
BlocksReconciled54540±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown337321+16±10.10
StealsNo team figurenot published222not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published496not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,4006,375+25.4±128.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Josh Reed71.0%-0.1range -1.5 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Kayden Mingo70.7%-1.0range -2.5 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Freddie Dilione V68.2%-0.0range -1.7 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Ivan Juric62.0%-0.4range -1.9 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Dominick Stewart56.1%-0.1range -1.4 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Melih Tunca54.3%+0.3range -1.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Eli Rice45.3%+0.0range -1.6 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Mason Blackwood25.4%-2.1range -2.9 to -1.2Sufficient evidence
Sasa Ciani21.5%+0.1range -1.1 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Tibor Mirtic16.1%+0.5range -0.8 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Justin Houser9.0%-0.9range -1.7 to -0.3Limited evidence
Chris Lotito0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+9.2range +8.2 to +10.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.9% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.8%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value