Aaron Clark
Pepperdine · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
977:54 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 32:36
- Points per game
- 15.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 2.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.3 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.8 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 460 | 101 | 82 | 34 | 4 | 83 | 52 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 153–368 | 41.6% | 12.3 | 15.1 |
| 2P | 95–208 | 45.7% | 6.9 | 8.5 |
| 3P | 58–160 | 36.3% | 5.3 | 6.5 |
| FT | 96–123 | 78.0% | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.5% | 54.5% | 43.5% | 33.4% | 0.99 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Pepperdine · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $68K
- 80% range $5K to $230K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.8%
- team pool $740K, 80% range $315K to $1.60M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $64K to $76K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 82.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Pepperdine: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Pepperdine | $68Kspeculative | $5K to $230K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.2 | -2.2 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -1.0 | +3.4range +2.9 to +3.8 | 3,233 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:55 | 32:36 | 19:24–44:05 | |
| Points | 18.8 | 15.3 | 2.0–33.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.8% | 46.4% | 0.0%–95.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | Portland | L 68–77 | 22:04 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Washington St. | W 88–79 | 36:03 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 6-17 | 0-6 | 8-9 | 35.3% |
| 2026-02-25 | Seattle U | L 80–87 | 32:28 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-8 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Oregon St. | L 73–83 | 37:17 | 32 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10-22 | 5-13 | 7-8 | 56.8% |
| 2026-02-18 | Portland | W 95–87 | 36:44 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 9-14 | 7-8 | 4-5 | 89.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | LMU (CA) | W 90–89 | 25:57 | 33 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9-17 | 5-7 | 10-12 | 67.6% |
| 2026-02-11 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 60–88 | 30:15 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-14 | 3-7 | 3-3 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | Pacific | L 59–92 | 29:11 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5-13 | 3-5 | 4-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Seattle U | L 81–83 | 37:08 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 7-12 | 1-4 | 7-7 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | San Diego | L 88–92 | 44:05 | 31 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 12-19 | 5-10 | 2-3 | 76.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Washington St. | L 79–95 | 36:22 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6-11 | 1-4 | 4-6 | 59.1% |
| 2026-01-21 | Gonzaga | L 60–84 | 32:53 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-13 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 34.6% |
| 2026-01-14 | Portland | W 67–63 | 36:08 | 18 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-14 | 2-6 | 4-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | San Francisco | L 60–80 | 36:56 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-08 | San Diego | L 63–83 | 29:40 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-04 | Pacific | L 69–74 | 27:25 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Santa Clara | L 63–82 | 19:24 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 45–72 | 29:33 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-28 | Gonzaga | L 56–96 | 33:56 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-14 | 0-6 | 0-1 | 14.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Rice | W 84–62 | 34:10 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-17 | 4-6 | 7-8 | 52.9% |
| 2025-12-18 | Long Beach St. | L 78–81 | 32:12 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | CSU Bakersfield | W 70–62 | 37:47 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10-15 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 76.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Vermont | L 56–65 | 34:57 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-13 | 1-7 | 3-5 | 34.6% |
| 2025-12-02 | Abilene Christian | L 63–71 | 37:21 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-14 | 0-7 | 5-7 | 21.4% |
| 2025-11-29 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 69–83 | 37:42 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | Fresno St. | L 53–76 | 22:05 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-11 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 13.6% |
| 2025-11-21 | SFA | L 60–63 | 38:47 | 30 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9-12 | 5-6 | 7-8 | 95.8% |
| 2025-11-18 | LSU New Orleans | W 90–79 | 21:58 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Northern Colo. | L 81–88 | 42:09 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9-24 | 0-6 | 2-3 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-07 | UCLA | L 63–74 | 25:17 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-13 | 2-5 | 6-6 | 46.2% |