Danilo Dozic
Pepperdine · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
796:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 31:51
- Points per game
- 10.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.8 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.6 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| Season totals | 270 | 64 | 35 | 10 | 13 | 34 | 30 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 91–224 | 40.6% | 9.0 | 11.3 |
| 2P | 48–104 | 46.2% | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| 3P | 43–120 | 35.8% | 4.8 | 6.0 |
| FT | 45–57 | 78.9% | 2.3 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.2% | 54.2% | 53.6% | 25.4% | 1.03 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Pepperdine · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $32K
- 80% range $3K to $135K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.3%
- team pool $740K, 80% range $315K to $1.60M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $30K to $36K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 63.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Pepperdine: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Pepperdine | $32Kspeculative | $3K to $135K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.8 | -3.0 to -0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | -1.1 | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.9 | 2,497 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:54 | 31:51 | 23:57–41:15 | |
| Points | 12.2 | 10.8 | 4.0–21.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 58.0% | 50.1% | 20.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-14 | LMU (CA) | W 90–89 | 34:47 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-12 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-11 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 60–88 | 25:13 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Pacific | L 59–92 | 28:24 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Seattle U | L 81–83 | 29:51 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-6 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | San Diego | L 88–92 | 41:15 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-12 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Washington St. | L 79–95 | 33:11 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-10 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 85.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Gonzaga | L 60–84 | 25:46 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Portland | W 67–63 | 36:03 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | San Francisco | L 60–80 | 29:30 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-13 | 1-7 | 2-4 | 34.6% |
| 2026-01-08 | San Diego | L 63–83 | 24:00 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | Pacific | L 69–74 | 32:50 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-02 | Santa Clara | L 63–82 | 29:36 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 45–72 | 31:03 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-28 | Gonzaga | L 56–96 | 30:27 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Rice | W 84–62 | 27:53 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-18 | Long Beach St. | L 78–81 | 36:51 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-14 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 53.6% |
| 2025-12-13 | CSU Bakersfield | W 70–62 | 33:40 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-9 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Vermont | L 56–65 | 34:24 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 4-4 | 31.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | Abilene Christian | L 63–71 | 32:58 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-29 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 69–83 | 23:57 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-26 | Fresno St. | L 53–76 | 30:29 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-21 | SFA | L 60–63 | 38:06 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-18 | LSU New Orleans | W 90–79 | 37:33 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-13 | 4-7 | 5-6 | 61.5% |
| 2025-11-15 | Northern Colo. | L 81–88 | 37:54 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 27.8% |
| 2025-11-07 | UCLA | L 63–74 | 30:45 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2-9 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 33.3% |