ND Okafor
Washington St. · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
724:47 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 23:23
- Points per game
- 11.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.6 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.2 | 5.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.1 | 9.7 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 5.5 |
| Season totals | 346 | 175 | 28 | 16 | 45 | 62 | 99 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 144–248 | 58.1% | 8.0 | 13.7 |
| 2P | 144–248 | 58.1% | 8.0 | 13.7 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 58–88 | 65.9% | 2.8 | 4.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.1% | 60.3% | 0.0% | 35.5% | 0.45 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Washington St · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $115K
- 80% range $26K to $345K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.0%
- team pool $930K, 80% range $400K to $2.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $90K to $130K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Washington St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Washington St | $115Kspeculative | $26K to $345K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.8 | -0.9 to +2.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.5 | +4.1range +3.4 to +4.8 | 2,202 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Washington St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -2.5 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | -0.2 | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.6 | 1,146 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | California | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.7 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | +0.2 | +0.8range +0.6 to +1.0 | 1,149 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:00 | 23:23 | 10:51–29:33 | |
| Points | 12.2 | 11.2 | 0.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.3% | 53.7% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Portland | L 68–74 | 23:01 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Pepperdine | L 79–88 | 29:26 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | LMU (CA) | L 66–67 | 24:43 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 67–83 | 26:03 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Pacific | W 87–70 | 21:49 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-12 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-10 | Gonzaga | L 53–83 | 23:26 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Santa Clara | L 92–96 | 29:10 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Oregon St. | L 64–74 | 25:49 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 5-8 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-31 | Portland | W 104–74 | 20:14 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | Seattle U | W 70–58 | 27:17 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Pepperdine | W 95–79 | 23:10 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 85.7% |
| 2026-01-21 | San Diego | L 92–96 | 29:33 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | San Francisco | L 80–85 | 26:28 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Gonzaga | L 65–86 | 10:51 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 82–88 | 23:32 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | Oregon St. | W 81–67 | 23:58 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | LMU (CA) | W 78–76 | 24:46 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Seattle U | L 55–69 | 26:21 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 45.5% |
| 2025-12-28 | Portland | W 67–62 | 19:40 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-20 | Mercer | W 84–78 | 17:52 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-17 | Eastern Wash. | W 78–63 | 20:46 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | Southern California | L 61–68 | 21:55 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-07 | Nevada | L 64–78 | 24:25 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | Bradley | L 60–64 | 23:20 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-26 | Seton Hall | L 61–75 | 21:29 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-25 | Arizona St. | L 94–100 | 23:50 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | Southern Utah | W 98–74 | 23:12 | 27 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 12-14 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | Washington | L 69–81 | 26:05 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | St. Thomas (MN) | W 81–71 | 23:09 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Davidson | L 69–85 | 22:16 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Idaho | L 81–83 | 17:11 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 33.3% |