Ace Glass lll
Washington St. · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season
Logged performance
889:29 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 28:42
- Points per game
- 16.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.1 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 22.4 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 499 | 94 | 74 | 24 | 3 | 73 | 59 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 174–385 | 45.2% | 12.4 | 17.3 |
| 2P | 106–196 | 54.1% | 6.3 | 8.8 |
| 3P | 68–189 | 36.0% | 6.1 | 8.5 |
| FT | 83–95 | 87.4% | 3.1 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.0% | 58.5% | 49.1% | 24.7% | 1.01 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Washington St · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $205K
- 80% range $69K to $600K
- Median share of team pool
- 20.0%
- team pool $930K, 80% range $400K to $2.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $155K to $225K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Washington St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Washington St | $205Kspeculative | $69K to $600K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.6 | +0.2 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | -0.1 | +5.4range +4.7 to +6.1 | 2,720 | Prior built from the box-score line only, without a prior-season value. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:16 | 28:42 | 15:49–37:53 | |
| Points | 16.6 | 16.1 | 3.0–40.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 51.8% | 53.1% | 12.5%–85.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Portland | L 68–74 | 34:35 | 19 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-16 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Pepperdine | L 79–88 | 33:42 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9-21 | 2-9 | 2-2 | 47.6% |
| 2026-02-25 | LMU (CA) | L 66–67 | 37:02 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9-16 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 59.4% |
| 2026-02-21 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 67–83 | 28:37 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 45.8% |
| 2026-02-18 | Pacific | W 87–70 | 27:23 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | Gonzaga | L 53–83 | 29:38 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4-13 | 0-5 | 4-4 | 30.8% |
| 2026-02-07 | Santa Clara | L 92–96 | 31:26 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6-15 | 4-10 | 4-4 | 53.3% |
| 2026-02-04 | Oregon St. | L 64–74 | 34:07 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-16 | 5-10 | 2-2 | 46.9% |
| 2026-01-31 | Portland | W 104–74 | 30:25 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-14 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 32.1% |
| 2026-01-28 | Seattle U | W 70–58 | 34:48 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Pepperdine | W 95–79 | 31:30 | 18 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7-13 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 69.2% |
| 2026-01-21 | San Diego | L 92–96 | 37:53 | 29 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 11-21 | 4-8 | 3-3 | 61.9% |
| 2026-01-18 | San Francisco | L 80–85 | 36:07 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9-16 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-15 | Gonzaga | L 65–86 | 33:34 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-13 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 53.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 82–88 | 29:00 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7-13 | 2-6 | 8-9 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-04 | Oregon St. | W 81–67 | 31:56 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7-15 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | LMU (CA) | W 78–76 | 29:29 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-10 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Seattle U | L 55–69 | 29:39 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4-13 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 42.3% |
| 2025-12-28 | Portland | W 67–62 | 25:59 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1-8 | 0-3 | 9-10 | 12.5% |
| 2025-12-20 | Mercer | W 84–78 | 29:37 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8-14 | 3-5 | 5-7 | 67.9% |
| 2025-12-17 | Eastern Wash. | W 78–63 | 23:51 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-11 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 63.6% |
| 2025-12-14 | Southern California | L 61–68 | 22:12 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 14.3% |
| 2025-12-07 | Nevada | L 64–78 | 25:44 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3-14 | 2-8 | 2-2 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-02 | Bradley | L 60–64 | 23:56 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-26 | Seton Hall | L 61–75 | 27:34 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 6-11 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 59.1% |
| 2025-11-25 | Arizona St. | L 94–100 | 31:46 | 40 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9-14 | 6-9 | 16-18 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-19 | Southern Utah | W 98–74 | 21:28 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-13 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 73.1% |
| 2025-11-14 | Washington | L 69–81 | 19:48 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-9 | 2-8 | 4-4 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-10 | St. Thomas (MN) | W 81–71 | 15:49 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Davidson | L 69–85 | 19:06 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Idaho | L 81–83 | 21:48 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7-11 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 68.2% |