Eemeli Yalaho
Washington St. · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
882:02 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 28:27
- Points per game
- 10.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.6 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.1 | 5.6 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.2 | 7.8 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 314 | 173 | 52 | 14 | 8 | 53 | 54 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 108–231 | 46.8% | 7.5 | 10.5 |
| 2P | 57–104 | 54.8% | 3.4 | 4.7 |
| 3P | 51–127 | 40.2% | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| FT | 47–60 | 78.3% | 1.9 | 2.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.8% | 61.0% | 55.0% | 26.0% | 0.98 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Washington St · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $68K
- 80% range $7K to $215K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.9%
- team pool $930K, 80% range $400K to $2.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $52K to $75K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 71.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Washington St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Washington St | $68Kspeculative | $7K to $215K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.7 | -1.8 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -1.9 | +4.2range +3.7 to +4.8 | 2,656 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Texas Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -1.3 to -0.1 | Limited evidence | -1.1 | +0.4 | +0.4range +0.4 to +0.5 | 331 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 29:53 | 28:27 | 19:17–35:01 | |
| Points | 9.8 | 10.1 | 0.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.1% | 56.5% | 0.0%–105.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Portland | L 68–74 | 32:20 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Pepperdine | L 79–88 | 24:28 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | LMU (CA) | L 66–67 | 31:56 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 67–83 | 31:17 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-9 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-18 | Pacific | W 87–70 | 29:24 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-10 | Gonzaga | L 53–83 | 28:36 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Santa Clara | L 92–96 | 35:01 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8-13 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 73.1% |
| 2026-02-04 | Oregon St. | L 64–74 | 31:46 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Portland | W 104–74 | 31:03 | 26 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8-10 | 5-6 | 5-5 | 105.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Seattle U | W 70–58 | 28:49 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Pepperdine | W 95–79 | 19:37 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | San Diego | L 92–96 | 21:11 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | San Francisco | L 80–85 | 33:34 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-13 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 80.8% |
| 2026-01-15 | Gonzaga | L 65–86 | 30:10 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 82–88 | 31:28 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | Oregon St. | W 81–67 | 33:13 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 3-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-02 | LMU (CA) | W 78–76 | 33:50 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-30 | Seattle U | L 55–69 | 29:05 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-28 | Portland | W 67–62 | 33:58 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 2-4 | 1-4 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-20 | Mercer | W 84–78 | 32:30 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-17 | Eastern Wash. | W 78–63 | 25:38 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-14 | Southern California | L 61–68 | 29:23 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-07 | Nevada | L 64–78 | 27:58 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-02 | Bradley | L 60–64 | 27:11 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-26 | Seton Hall | L 61–75 | 24:18 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | Arizona St. | L 94–100 | 29:33 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 91.7% |
| 2025-11-19 | Southern Utah | W 98–74 | 27:29 | 14 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | Washington | L 69–81 | 19:17 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 68.2% |
| 2025-11-10 | St. Thomas (MN) | W 81–71 | 21:15 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-07 | Davidson | L 69–85 | 22:01 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-03 | Idaho | L 81–83 | 24:43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 30.0% |