Portland

WCC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 295 · Raw net -8.6 · Tempo 69.7 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 13–19; 13 wins
AdjNet: -5.8β; rank 253 of 365
AdjO: 104.2β; rank 267 of 365
AdjD: 110.1β; rank 223 of 365
AdjT: 69.3β
SOS: 2.1β; rank 103 of 363
NCSOS: -0.9β
WAB: -10.3β; rank 230 of 363
RR: 2.4β
Exp. W: 10.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	102.6296	111.2254	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.2188	52.7255	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.7342	17.0150	16.7
Offensive rebound %	28.1265	32.5281	30.6
FTA / FGA %	34.4197	32.6118	35.0
Shooting
3P%	29.9343	36.1307	33.9
2P%	54.766	51.4160	51.7
FT%	74.0132	74.4287	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.4	45.6	39.5
Assists / FGM %	61.6	66.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.8	6.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	24.8	38.2	31.4
2-pointers %	55.2	43.1	48.8
Free throws %	19.9	18.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.8
Top Three Share of Minutes: 42%
Bench Share of Minutes: 37%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-06	Ark.-Pine Bluff	W 83–74	82.5	Home	1–0
11-09	UC Davis	W 67–63	69.5	Home	2–0
11-15	Wyoming	L 56–93	70.4	Away	2–1
11-21	Cal St. Fullerton	W 103–85	78.3	Home	3–1
11-22	Northern Colo.	L 80–86 1OT	80.6	Home	3–2
11-23	St. Thomas (MN)	L 66–76	71.4	Home	3–3
11-26	Long Beach St.	W 93–73	71.8	Home	4–3
12-01	Stanford	L 72–94	69.5	Away	4–4
12-14	Kent St.	W 88–78	81.6	Home	5–4
12-17	Oregon	L 69–94	78.8	Away	5–5
12-22	UC Santa Barbara	L 61–79	63.8	Away	5–6
12-28	Washington St.	L 62–67	68.3	Home	5–7
12-30	Santa Clara	L 85–92	71.3	Home	5–8
01-02	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 57–78	64.0	Away	5–9
01-04	San Francisco	L 68–73	67.6	Away	5–10
01-08	Pacific	W 90–89 1OT	73.4	Home	6–10
01-10	Oregon St.	W 82–76	65.9	Home	7–10
01-14	Pepperdine	L 63–67	67.4	Away	7–11
01-17	LMU (CA)	W 71–58	69.5	Away	8–11
01-24	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 69–75	64.8	Home	8–12
01-28	Pacific	L 51–74	63.7	Away	8–13
01-31	Washington St.	L 74–104	71.6	Away	8–14
02-04	Gonzaga	W 87–80	73.9	Home	9–14
02-07	Seattle U	W 54–53	62.5	Home	10–14
02-11	San Diego	L 58–71	63.7	Away	10–15
02-18	Pepperdine	L 87–95	69.7	Home	10–16
02-21	Seattle U	L 59–71	68.6	Away	10–17
02-25	Gonzaga	L 48–89	67.5	Away	10–18
02-28	San Diego	W 87–74	69.2	Home	11–18
03-05	Pepperdine	W 77–68	69.3	Neutral	12–18
03-06	Washington St.	W 74–68	69.6	Neutral	13–18
03-07	San Francisco	L 65–82	67.0	Neutral	13–19

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Joel Foxwell	32	35:48	88.8%	506	136	206	44	3	100	50	110–238	46.2%	67–208	32.2%	85–107	79.4%	47.2%	51.3%	24.0%	5	36:53 +1:05	92.2%	13.0 −2.8
Garrett Nuckolls	32	25:45	63.9%	212	106	80	37	14	68	66	71–147	48.3%	11–67	16.4%	37–44	84.1%	40.9%	45.4%	20.6%	5	33:55 +8:10	84.8%	13.8 +7.2
James O'Donnell	32	22:34	56.0%	303	134	35	13	17	60	87	120–185	64.9%	0–1	0.0%†	63–106	59.4%	64.5%	65.1%	57.0%	5	27:26 +4:52	68.6%	7.2 −2.3
Cameron Williams	29	24:00	53.9%	287	128	24	11	6	33	75	96–178	53.9%	11–41	26.8%†	62–78	79.5%	51.4%	56.6%	35.6%	3	13:09 −10:51	19.7%	6.0 −3.9
Mikah Ballew	29	23:13	52.2%	241	51	24	20	2	38	48	24–71	33.8%	45–138	32.6%	58–69	84.1%	43.8%	50.3%	33.0%	5	14:11 −9:02	35.4%	4.4 −3.9
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	32	20:17	50.3%	287	143	47	7	21	40	70	77–130	59.2%	21–58	36.2%	70–99	70.7%	57.7%	62.0%	52.7%	5	26:41 +6:25	66.7%	13.4 +4.4
Dante Censori-Hercules	31	20:55	50.3%	100	109	45	27	6	20	67	37–60	61.7%†	1–12	8.3%†	23–35	65.7%	53.5%†	57.2%†	48.6%†	5	30:26 +9:31	76.1%	7.4 +4.2
Matus Hronsky	29	18:20	41.2%	163	57	24	16	6	30	32	33–61	54.1%	26–86	30.2%	19–21	90.5%†	49.0%	52.2%	14.3%	5	13:33 −4:47	33.9%	6.2 +0.6
Timo George	13	19:58	20.1%	152	59	17	7	14	26	36	58–76	76.3%†	2–10	20.0%†	30–44	68.2%	70.9%†	72.1%†	51.2%†	—	—	—	—
NaVaughn Long	12	10:50	10.1%	26	12	3	2	1	7	12	5–11	45.5%†	5–9	55.6%†	1–2	50.0%†	62.5%†	62.3%†	10.0%†	1	8:57 −1:53	4.5%	2.0 −0.2
Kelson GebbersUnder 100 minutes	13	5:09	5.2%	13	10	2	1	2	3	16	3–3	100.0%†	2–7	28.6%†	1–2	50.0%†	60.0%†	59.7%†	20.0%†	3	5:08 −0:01	7.7%	0.7 −0.3
Samuel NolandUnder 100 minutes	13	3:59	4.0%	9	2	1	1	0	0	4	2–4	50.0%†	0–0	—	5–6	83.3%†	50.0%†	67.8%†	150.0%†	5	2:49 −1:10	7.1%	0.4 −0.3
Riley ParkerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	19:25	1.5%	4	1	2	1	0	1	1	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	4–5	80.0%†	0.0%†	62.5%†	500.0%†	—	—	—	—
Preston LeeFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	1:01	0.5%	3	0	0	0	0	0	1	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	100.0%†	79.8%†	200.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	32 games			2306	1047	510	not published	92	442	not published	637–1165	54.7%	191–638	29.9%	459–620	74.0%	51.2%	55.5%	34.4%
Sum of players				2306	948	510	187	92	426	565	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+99	0	not published	0	+16	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $605K; 80% Range $270K to $1.30M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $570K to $660K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Joel Foxwell	88.8%	$95K	$9K to $260K	17.7%	$90K to $105K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Garrett Nuckolls	65.2%	$45K	$3K to $140K	10.1%	$43K to $49K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
James O'Donnell	56.7%	$61K	$7K to $185K	11.3%	$58K to $66K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cameron Williams	52.5%	$30K	$3K to $110K	7.0%	$29K to $33K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dante Censori-Hercules	52.2%	$84K	$21K to $265K	13.0%	$80K to $92K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	51.7%	$48K	$5K to $140K	9.6%	$45K to $52K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mikah Ballew	51.0%	$15K	$2K to $79K	4.0%	$14K to $17K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Matus Hronsky	40.0%	$32K	$4K to $105K	6.8%	$30K to $34K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Timo George	19.5%	$61K	$20K to $240K	8.6%	$57K to $66K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
NaVaughn Long	10.6%	$9K	$3K to $26K	1.9%	$8K to $10K	$4K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kelson Gebbers	5.3%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.7%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Samuel Noland	4.2%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.7%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Riley Parker	1.6%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.7%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Preston Lee	0.6%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.7%	$4K in all four	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$605K	$270K to $1.30M	100%	$570K to $660K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Portland (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,575,365	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,575,365
Athletics department expenses	$22,516,434
Athletics department revenue	$22,516,435

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 32 games, 2,247 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,306	2,499
Field goals made	828	857
Field goals attempted	1,803	1,928
3-pointers made	191	318
3-pointers attempted	638	880
Free throws made	459	467
Free throws attempted	620	628
Offensive rebounds	288	366
Defensive rebounds	759	738
Total rebounds	1,047	1,104
Assists	510	572
Blocks	92	76
Turnovers	442	382
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 187.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 565.
Minutes (derived)	6,450	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,306	2,306	0	±11.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	828	828	0	±4.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,803	1,803	0	±9.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	191	191	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	638	638	0	±3.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	459	459	0	±2.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	620	620	0	±3.1	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,047	948	+99	±83.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	510	510	0	±2.6	0
Blocks	Reconciled	92	92	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	442	426	+16	±13.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	187	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	565	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,450	6,424	+26.4	±129.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Joel Foxwell	88.8%	+0.0range -1.1 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Garrett Nuckolls	65.2%	-0.8range -2.3 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
James O'Donnell	56.7%	+0.0range -1.5 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Cameron Williams	52.5%	-1.5range -2.6 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Dante Censori-Hercules	52.2%	+0.4range -0.7 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	51.7%	-0.4range -1.7 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Mikah Ballew	51.0%	-2.1range -3.2 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Matus Hronsky	40.0%	-0.8range -1.9 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Timo George	19.5%	+2.0range +1.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
NaVaughn Long	10.6%	-1.2range -1.7 to -0.5Limited evidence
Kelson Gebbers	5.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Samuel Noland	4.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Riley Parker	1.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Preston Lee	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.8range +7.8 to +9.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 97.7% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.1%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value