Joel Foxwell
Portland · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1145:31 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 35:48
- Points per game
- 15.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 6.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.8 | 4.3 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.7 | 4.7 | 7.2 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 1.7 |
| Season totals | 506 | 136 | 206 | 44 | 3 | 100 | 50 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 177–446 | 39.7% | 13.9 | 15.6 |
| 2P | 110–238 | 46.2% | 7.4 | 8.3 |
| 3P | 67–208 | 32.2% | 6.5 | 7.3 |
| FT | 85–107 | 79.4% | 3.3 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.2% | 51.3% | 46.6% | 24.0% | 2.06 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Portland · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $95K
- 80% range $9K to $260K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.7%
- team pool $605K, 80% range $270K to $1.30M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $90K to $105K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $4K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 88.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Portland: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Portland | $95Kspeculative | $9K to $260K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.0 | -1.1 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.8 | +4.8range +4.1 to +5.3 | 3,628 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:53 | 35:48 | 27:20–42:40 | |
| Points | 13.0 | 15.8 | 2.0–35.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 35.4% | 46.1% | 16.7%–88.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | San Francisco | L 65–82 | 38:05 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6-17 | 2-9 | 2-3 | 41.2% |
| 2026-03-06 | Washington St. | W 74–68 | 38:01 | 17 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-14 | 1-5 | 8-8 | 32.1% |
| 2026-03-05 | Pepperdine | W 77–68 | 38:30 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3-15 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 23.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | San Diego | W 87–74 | 35:24 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-13 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 38.5% |
| 2026-02-25 | Gonzaga | L 48–89 | 34:24 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4-12 | 2-6 | 2-3 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Seattle U | L 59–71 | 38:26 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5-12 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-18 | Pepperdine | L 87–95 | 37:38 | 35 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 13-23 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 60.9% |
| 2026-02-11 | San Diego | L 58–71 | 33:26 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2-11 | 0-7 | 6-6 | 18.2% |
| 2026-02-07 | Seattle U | W 54–53 | 35:32 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2-11 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 22.7% |
| 2026-02-04 | Gonzaga | W 87–80 | 38:35 | 27 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11-18 | 3-8 | 2-4 | 69.4% |
| 2026-01-31 | Washington St. | L 74–104 | 31:02 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 8-20 | 2-8 | 3-6 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Pacific | L 51–74 | 29:04 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-12 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 69–75 | 38:37 | 27 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8-22 | 4-10 | 7-7 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | LMU (CA) | W 71–58 | 39:24 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-17 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 47.1% |
| 2026-01-14 | Pepperdine | L 63–67 | 37:36 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-14 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Oregon St. | W 82–76 | 38:12 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-16 | 1-8 | 7-7 | 34.4% |
| 2026-01-08 | Pacific | W 90–89 | 42:40 | 27 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 9-20 | 5-6 | 4-4 | 57.5% |
| 2026-01-04 | San Francisco | L 68–73 | 39:52 | 20 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-13 | 1-6 | 5-7 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-02 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 57–78 | 33:46 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4-12 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-30 | Santa Clara | L 85–92 | 37:44 | 20 | 2 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-15 | 5-10 | 1-2 | 63.3% |
| 2025-12-28 | Washington St. | L 62–67 | 37:23 | 15 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-19 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 39.5% |
| 2025-12-22 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | L 61–79 | 30:06 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2025-12-17 | Oregon | L 69–94 | 36:06 | 21 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8-17 | 2-6 | 3-4 | 52.9% |
| 2025-12-14 | Kent St. | W 88–78 | 37:10 | 11 | 1 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 45.0% |
| 2025-12-01 | Stanford | L 72–94 | 31:50 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-26 | Long Beach St. | W 93–73 | 32:42 | 19 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-10 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 85.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 66–76 | 39:44 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-22 | Northern Colo. | L 80–86 | 33:05 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-12 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-21 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 103–85 | 33:27 | 24 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 9-13 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 88.5% |
| 2025-11-15 | Wyoming | L 56–93 | 27:20 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-09 | UC Davis | W 67–63 | 38:43 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7-14 | 5-10 | 4-5 | 67.9% |
| 2025-11-06 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 83–74 | 31:57 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-5 | 4-5 | 40.0% |