FIU

CUSA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 208 · Raw net -1.9 · Tempo 71.5 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-10

Record: 12–17; 12 wins
AdjNet: -1.5β; rank 197 of 365
AdjO: 107.4β; rank 192 of 365
AdjD: 109.0β; rank 197 of 365
AdjT: 71.8β
SOS: -0.2β; rank 171 of 363
NCSOS: 1.5β
WAB: -10.4β; rank 233 of 363
RR: -1.8β
Exp. W: 13.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	107.4200	109.2203	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.6210	52.9263	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.7255	20.121	16.7
Offensive rebound %	33.969	34.8336	30.6
FTA / FGA %	38.685	35.9208	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.7138	36.2312	33.9
2P%	49.9259	51.7175	51.7
FT%	69.4288	70.157	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	32.7	45.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	49.9	62.2	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	13.2	8.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	26.6	37.4	31.4
2-pointers %	52.4	43.3	48.8
Free throws %	20.9	19.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.6
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 33%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-08	Nebraska	L 66–96	76.8	Away	0–1
11-13	LSU	L 81–98	77.6	Away	0–2
11-24	James Madison	L 72–80	67.5	Home	0–3
11-26	Omaha	W 74–61	72.0	Home	1–3
12-03	FGCU	W 89–83	75.8	Home	2–3
12-06	Jacksonville	W 88–65	69.5	Home	3–3
12-16	Miami (FL)	L 81–98	75.8	Away	3–4
12-20	LIU	W 86–79	76.2	Home	4–4
12-28	Liberty	L 94–97 1OT	76.8	Home	4–5
01-02	New Mexico St.	W 89–74	71.0	Home	5–5
01-04	UTEP	W 76–64	66.8	Home	6–5
01-07	Jacksonville St.	L 64–71	64.8	Away	6–6
01-10	Missouri St.	L 71–79	71.4	Away	6–7
01-14	Kennesaw St.	L 86–89	73.8	Away	6–8
01-17	Sam Houston	L 63–76	74.9	Home	6–9
01-22	UTEP	L 77–83	71.7	Away	6–10
01-24	New Mexico St.	W 81–78	75.6	Away	7–10
01-28	Jacksonville St.	L 74–78	79.8	Home	7–11
02-04	Middle Tenn.	W 88–84 1OT	82.1	Away	8–11
02-07	Western Ky.	L 70–80	68.1	Away	8–12
02-12	Delaware	L 66–68	66.8	Home	8–13
02-14	Louisiana Tech	W 77–64	67.6	Home	9–13
02-19	Liberty	L 89–90 1OT	79.2	Away	9–14
02-21	Missouri St.	W 70–67	67.2	Home	10–14
02-26	Sam Houston	L 67–100	73.3	Away	10–15
02-28	Louisiana Tech	W 84–76	69.6	Away	11–15
03-05	Middle Tenn.	L 67–73	68.8	Home	11–16
03-07	Western Ky.	W 92–67	73.2	Home	12–16
03-10	Missouri St.	L 72–75	65.1	Neutral	12–17

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 29 of 29 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Corey Stephenson	28	32:25	77.2%	22.4	7.7	2.0	1.7	0.6	2.7	2.7	106–214	49.5%	65–165	39.4%	101–137	73.7%	53.7%	57.8%	36.1%	5	32:51 +0:26	82.1%	18.8 +0.7
Zawdie Jackson	29	29:29	72.7%	16.2	3.5	4.0	1.6	0.0	1.8	2.4	71–154	46.1%	24–69	34.8%	133–153	86.9%	48.0%	59.8%	68.6%	5	31:27 +1:58	78.6%	14.2 +2.2
Eric Dibami	28	29:32	70.4%	12.9	9.9	1.9	1.9	2.0	2.3	4.4	103–195	52.8%	0–1	0.0%†	61–115	53.0%	52.6%	54.1%	58.7%	5	33:07 +3:34	82.8%	11.0 +1.5
Hamed Olayinka	29	23:52	58.9%	15.7	10.9	1.6	1.5	2.1	2.6	6.1	111–202	55.0%	1–11	9.1%†	46–84	54.8%	52.8%	54.2%	39.4%	5	21:42 −2:10	54.3%	8.4 −0.9
Julian Mackey	27	23:13	53.3%	21.1	3.6	2.6	1.6	0.4	2.4	2.2	60–120	50.0%	49–133	36.8%	64–91	70.3%	52.8%	56.5%	36.0%	5	27:58 +4:45	69.9%	13.4 +1.1
Brit Harris	29	18:27	45.5%	11.0	5.2	3.1	2.2	0.3	1.7	2.8	23–43	53.5%	28–93	30.1%	17–28	60.7%	47.8%	49.6%	20.6%	5	19:07 +0:41	47.8%	3.2 −1.9
Ashton Williamson	23	22:57	44.9%	12.8	3.9	3.6	2.0	0.2	3.6	2.2	41–93	44.1%	24–82	29.3%	15–18	83.3%†	44.0%	46.2%	10.3%	1	1:40 −21:17	0.8%	0.0 −7.3
Ibrahim Olajuwon	29	13:44	33.9%	10.6	8.3	0.4	1.5	2.0	1.9	6.2	44–82	53.7%†	0–1	0.0%†	18–32	56.3%	53.0%†	54.6%†	38.6%†	5	15:00 +1:16	37.5%	2.0 −1.7
Thiago Sucatzky	29	13:12	32.6%	9.7	2.8	5.8	2.1	0.1	4.2	3.0	26–65	40.0%†	9–21	42.9%†	14–16	87.5%†	45.9%†	50.0%†	18.6%†	5	15:02 +1:50	37.6%	5.0 +1.8
Kennedy BrownUnder 100 minutes	18	5:04	7.8%	4.4	7.0	2.2	0.4	0.4	1.8	9.2	4–15	26.7%†	0–0	—	2–4	50.0%†	26.7%†	29.8%†	26.7%†	4	2:42 −2:22	5.4%	0.0 −0.6
Amarion NimmersFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	4:45	0.8%	12.6	0.0	4.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	8.4	1–1	100.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	50.0%†	52.1%†	100.0%†	—	—	—	—
Renato RuizFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	1:09	0.5%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	14.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	1	1:51 +0:42	0.9%	0.0 0.0
Aydan ClintonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	1:15	0.1%	64.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	100.0%†	100.0%†	0.0%†	1	1:15 0:00	0.6%	2.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	29 games			76.7	35.7	13.4	not published	4.3	12.7	not published	591–1185	49.9%	200–577	34.7%	472–680	69.4%	50.6%	54.7%	38.6%
Sum of players				76.7	32.2	13.4	8.7	4.3	12.4	17.9	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.5	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.3	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $230K; 80% Range $86K to $620K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $230K in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Corey Stephenson	77.3%	$45K	$15K to $130K	18.8%	$45K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zawdie Jackson	73.3%	$48K	$16K to $140K	20.0%	$48K to $49K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eric Dibami	72.1%	$51K	$17K to $145K	20.7%	$51K to $52K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Hamed Olayinka	59.3%	$24K	$6K to $76K	11.6%	$24K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Julian Mackey	53.0%	$5K	$1K to $28K	2.2%	$5K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ashton Williamson	45.5%	$9K	$1K to $35K	5.5%	$9K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brit Harris	45.1%	$7K	$1K to $32K	4.4%	$7K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ibrahim Olajuwon	33.9%	$5K	$1K to $23K	3.0%	$5K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Thiago Sucatzky	31.6%	$5K	$1K to $21K	2.7%	$5K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kennedy Brown	7.7%	$2K	$1K to $8K	1.1%	$2K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amarion Nimmers	0.8%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Renato Ruiz	0.4%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Aydan Clinton	0.1%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$230K	$86K to $620K	100%	$230K in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

No EADA match for this school.

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 29 games, 2,099 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1175 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	76.7	78.1
Field goals made	26.9	26.7
Field goals attempted	60.0	59.6
3-pointers made	6.8	9.7
3-pointers attempted	19.6	26.9
Free throws made	16.1	15.0
Free throws attempted	23.1	21.4
Offensive rebounds	12.4	12.5
Defensive rebounds	23.4	24.1
Total rebounds	35.7	36.6
Assists	13.4	16.6
Blocks	4.3	3.4
Turnovers	12.7	14.3
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 255.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 526.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

29 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,254	2,254	0	±11.3	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	791	791	0	±4.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,762	1,762	0	±8.8	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	200	200	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	577	577	0	±2.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	472	472	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	680	680	0	±3.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,050	947	+103	±84.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	395	395	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	127	127	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	372	363	+9	±11.2	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	255	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	526	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,875	5,860	+15.2	±117.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Corey Stephenson	77.3%	+1.7range +0.6 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Zawdie Jackson	73.3%	+2.2range +0.8 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Eric Dibami	72.1%	+2.2range +0.9 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Hamed Olayinka	59.3%	+0.8range -0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Julian Mackey	53.0%	-2.6range -3.8 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
Ashton Williamson	45.5%	-0.7range -1.7 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Brit Harris	45.1%	-1.2range -2.3 to +0.0Sufficient evidence
Ibrahim Olajuwon	33.9%	-1.5range -2.6 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Thiago Sucatzky	31.6%	-1.8range -3.1 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Kennedy Brown	7.7%	-2.7range -3.7 to -1.5Limited evidence
Amarion Nimmers	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Renato Ruiz	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Aydan Clinton	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.8range +8.8 to +10.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.7% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.5%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value

FIU