Florida Intl

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Florida Intl, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Corey Stephenson	77.3%	+1.7range +0.6 to +2.7Sufficient evidence	+5.6range +5.0 to +6.2Sufficient evidence	$45KspeculativeLoading	$15K to $130KLoading
Zawdie Jackson	73.3%	+2.2range +0.8 to +3.2Sufficient evidence	+5.5range +4.8 to +6.1Sufficient evidence	$48KspeculativeLoading	$16K to $140KLoading
Eric Dibami	72.1%	+2.2range +0.9 to +3.5Sufficient evidence	+5.5range +4.9 to +6.1Sufficient evidence	$51KspeculativeLoading	$17K to $145KLoading
Hamed Olayinka	59.3%	+0.8range -0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence	+4.0range +3.5 to +4.6Sufficient evidence	$24KspeculativeLoading	$6K to $76KLoading
Julian Mackey	53.0%	-2.6range -3.8 to -1.1Sufficient evidence	+2.5range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidence	$5KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $28KLoading
Ashton Williamson	45.5%	-0.7range -1.7 to +0.2Sufficient evidence	+2.7range +2.3 to +3.0Sufficient evidence	$9KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $35KLoading
Brit Harris	45.1%	-1.2range -2.3 to +0.0Sufficient evidence	+2.5range +2.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence	$7KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $32KLoading
Ibrahim Olajuwon	33.9%	-1.5range -2.6 to -0.4Sufficient evidence	+1.8range +1.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidence	$5KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $23KLoading
Thiago Sucatzky	31.6%	-1.8range -3.1 to -0.4Sufficient evidence	+1.6range +1.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidence	$5KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $21KLoading
Kennedy Brown	7.7%	-2.7range -3.7 to -1.5Limited evidence	+0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidence	$2KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $8KLoading
Amarion Nimmers	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $5KLoading
Renato Ruiz	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $5KLoading
Aydan Clinton	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $5KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $230K; 80% Range $86K to $620K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $230K in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Corey Stephenson	77.3%	$45K	$15K to $130K	18.8%	$45K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zawdie Jackson	73.3%	$48K	$16K to $140K	20.0%	$48K to $49K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eric Dibami	72.1%	$51K	$17K to $145K	20.7%	$51K to $52K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Hamed Olayinka	59.3%	$24K	$6K to $76K	11.6%	$24K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Julian Mackey	53.0%	$5K	$1K to $28K	2.2%	$5K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ashton Williamson	45.5%	$9K	$1K to $35K	5.5%	$9K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brit Harris	45.1%	$7K	$1K to $32K	4.4%	$7K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ibrahim Olajuwon	33.9%	$5K	$1K to $23K	3.0%	$5K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Thiago Sucatzky	31.6%	$5K	$1K to $21K	2.7%	$5K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kennedy Brown	7.7%	$2K	$1K to $8K	1.1%	$2K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amarion Nimmers	0.8%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Renato Ruiz	0.4%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Aydan Clinton	0.1%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$230K	$86K to $620K	100%	$230K in all four	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

No EADA match for this school.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

1 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

No program revenue was published for this team.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
2 days	7
3 or more days	21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	1
Longest run of consecutive away games	3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology