Hamed Olayinka
FIU · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
691:58 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 23:52
- Points per game
- 9.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.5 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.3 | 6.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 3.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.7 | 10.9 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 6.1 |
| Season totals | 271 | 189 | 27 | 26 | 36 | 45 | 105 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 112–213 | 52.6% | 7.3 | 12.3 |
| 2P | 111–202 | 55.0% | 7.0 | 11.7 |
| 3P | 1–11 | 9.1%† | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| FT | 46–84 | 54.8% | 2.9 | 4.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.8% | 54.2% | 5.2% | 39.4% | 0.60 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida Intl · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $24K
- 80% range $6K to $76K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.6%
- team pool $230K, 80% range $86K to $620K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $24K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida Intl: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida Intl | $24Kspeculative | $6K to $76K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.8 | -0.3 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | +0.8 | +4.0range +3.5 to +4.6 | 2,398 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Utah Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.7 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | +0.4 | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.6 | 1,458 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 21:42 | 23:52 | 11:30–34:09 | |
| Points | 8.4 | 9.3 | 4.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 54.7% | 53.7% | 16.7%–87.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Missouri St. | L 72–75 | 25:40 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2026-03-07 | Western Ky. | W 92–67 | 22:47 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2026-03-05 | Middle Tenn. | L 67–73 | 29:51 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 4-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 36.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | Louisiana Tech | W 84–76 | 14:17 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Sam Houston | L 67–100 | 15:55 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Missouri St. | W 70–67 | 30:57 | 13 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-19 | Liberty | L 89–90 | 34:09 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8-12 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Louisiana Tech | W 77–64 | 33:30 | 11 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Delaware | L 66–68 | 16:41 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Western Ky. | L 70–80 | 20:43 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-04 | Middle Tenn. | W 88–84 | 25:16 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Jacksonville St. | L 74–78 | 19:43 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | New Mexico St. | W 81–78 | 22:11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | UTEP | L 77–83 | 27:51 | 19 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8-15 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 53.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | Sam Houston | L 63–76 | 26:38 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 3-10 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | Kennesaw St. | L 86–89 | 23:48 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Missouri St. | L 71–79 | 23:52 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-07 | Jacksonville St. | L 64–71 | 30:02 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | UTEP | W 76–64 | 28:00 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-02 | New Mexico St. | W 89–74 | 28:58 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Liberty | L 94–97 | 19:00 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | LIU | W 86–79 | 11:30 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Miami (FL) | L 81–98 | 21:11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Jacksonville | W 88–65 | 19:55 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-03 | FGCU | W 89–83 | 20:28 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 87.5% |
| 2025-11-26 | Omaha | W 74–61 | 19:45 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | James Madison | L 72–80 | 23:41 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | LSU | L 81–98 | 28:05 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-11 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 36.4% |
| 2025-11-08 | Nebraska | L 66–96 | 27:34 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 85.7% |