Julian Mackey
FIU · 2025–26 · 27 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
626:38 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 27
- Minutes per game
- 23:13
- Points per game
- 12.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.3 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.1 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 331 | 57 | 40 | 25 | 7 | 38 | 35 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 109–253 | 43.1% | 9.4 | 16.1 |
| 2P | 60–120 | 50.0% | 4.4 | 7.7 |
| 3P | 49–133 | 36.8% | 4.9 | 8.5 |
| FT | 64–91 | 70.3% | 3.4 | 5.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.8% | 56.5% | 52.6% | 36.0% | 1.05 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida Intl · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $5K
- 80% range $1K to $28K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.2%
- team pool $230K, 80% range $86K to $620K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $5K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 53.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida Intl: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida Intl | $5Kspeculative | $1K to $28K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.6 | -3.8 to -1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -3.2 | +2.5range +2.0 to +3.0 | 2,145 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Houston Chr | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.6 | -2.4 to -0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -1.3 | +2.3range +1.9 to +2.9 | 2,055 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Georgia St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.8 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -0.3 | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.1 | 904 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Niagara | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.3 | -1.2 to +0.5 | Limited evidence | -0.0 | -0.3 | Not computed for this season | 443 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:58 | 23:13 | 5:19–30:31 | |
| Points | 13.4 | 12.3 | 0.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.5% | 50.0% | 0.0%–85.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Missouri St. | L 72–75 | 28:48 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-9 | 1-6 | 3-3 | 27.8% |
| 2026-03-07 | Western Ky. | W 92–67 | 27:57 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-13 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 57.7% |
| 2026-03-05 | Middle Tenn. | L 67–73 | 29:08 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7-14 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | Louisiana Tech | W 84–76 | 25:57 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 68.2% |
| 2026-02-26 | Sam Houston | L 67–100 | 28:00 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-12 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Missouri St. | W 70–67 | 28:13 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8-16 | 2-7 | 4-6 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | Liberty | L 89–90 | 21:37 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Louisiana Tech | W 77–64 | 12:26 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | Delaware | L 66–68 | 17:21 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-8 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | Jacksonville St. | L 74–78 | 23:08 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 7-7 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-24 | New Mexico St. | W 81–78 | 23:31 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | UTEP | L 77–83 | 26:26 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 85.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Sam Houston | L 63–76 | 26:02 | 23 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-13 | 4-7 | 9-12 | 53.8% |
| 2026-01-14 | Kennesaw St. | L 86–89 | 30:31 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-13 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 46.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | Missouri St. | L 71–79 | 26:47 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-10 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Jacksonville St. | L 64–71 | 11:19 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | UTEP | W 76–64 | 19:49 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 4-5 | 14.3% |
| 2026-01-02 | New Mexico St. | W 89–74 | 5:19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Liberty | L 94–97 | 26:31 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | LIU | W 86–79 | 25:18 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-12 | 2-4 | 4-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Miami (FL) | L 81–98 | 24:49 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 61.1% |
| 2025-12-06 | Jacksonville | W 88–65 | 20:21 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | FGCU | W 89–83 | 26:20 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-5 | 6-7 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-26 | Omaha | W 74–61 | 22:05 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-24 | James Madison | L 72–80 | 24:01 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | LSU | L 81–98 | 24:19 | 24 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-13 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 80.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | Nebraska | L 66–96 | 20:35 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 78.6% |