Corey Stephenson
FIU · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
907:36 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 32:25
- Points per game
- 18.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.3 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.1 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 22.4 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 508 | 175 | 46 | 38 | 14 | 62 | 62 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 171–379 | 45.1% | 13.5 | 16.7 |
| 2P | 106–214 | 49.5% | 7.6 | 9.4 |
| 3P | 65–165 | 39.4% | 5.9 | 7.3 |
| FT | 101–137 | 73.7% | 4.9 | 6.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.7% | 57.8% | 43.5% | 36.1% | 0.74 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida Intl · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $45K
- 80% range $15K to $130K
- Median share of team pool
- 18.8%
- team pool $230K, 80% range $86K to $620K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $45K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 77.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida Intl: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida Intl | $45Kspeculative | $15K to $130K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +0.6 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +0.3 | +5.6range +5.0 to +6.2 | 3,128 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | CS Bakersfield | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.9 | -2.2 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.4 | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.7 | 1,426 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:51 | 32:25 | 24:27–38:38 | |
| Points | 18.8 | 18.1 | 7.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 54.1% | 54.3% | 23.3%–85.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Missouri St. | L 72–75 | 37:10 | 24 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9-15 | 2-6 | 4-6 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-07 | Western Ky. | W 92–67 | 28:18 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7-17 | 1-5 | 3-4 | 44.1% |
| 2026-03-05 | Middle Tenn. | L 67–73 | 31:29 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-11 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Louisiana Tech | W 84–76 | 36:21 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7-14 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | Sam Houston | L 67–100 | 30:56 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-13 | 1-6 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Missouri St. | W 70–67 | 35:47 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-14 | 2-5 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Liberty | L 89–90 | 38:38 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 6-16 | 5-10 | 6-6 | 53.1% |
| 2026-02-14 | Louisiana Tech | W 77–64 | 29:40 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-12 | Delaware | L 66–68 | 27:37 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-15 | 1-8 | 0-0 | 23.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Western Ky. | L 70–80 | 35:29 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-14 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 46.4% |
| 2026-02-04 | Middle Tenn. | W 88–84 | 36:59 | 34 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13-22 | 4-8 | 4-8 | 68.2% |
| 2026-01-28 | Jacksonville St. | L 74–78 | 32:41 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-14 | 4-7 | 2-4 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | New Mexico St. | W 81–78 | 32:37 | 25 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7-15 | 1-5 | 10-12 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | UTEP | L 77–83 | 34:44 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | Sam Houston | L 63–76 | 34:38 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3-12 | 2-5 | 6-10 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Missouri St. | L 71–79 | 31:18 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4-13 | 0-4 | 4-4 | 30.8% |
| 2026-01-07 | Jacksonville St. | L 64–71 | 35:21 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4-14 | 2-7 | 7-8 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-04 | UTEP | W 76–64 | 29:35 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6-11 | 1-5 | 4-7 | 59.1% |
| 2026-01-02 | New Mexico St. | W 89–74 | 32:27 | 21 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-12 | 3-4 | 4-6 | 70.8% |
| 2025-12-28 | Liberty | L 94–97 | 35:53 | 17 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 6-14 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 53.6% |
| 2025-12-20 | LIU | W 86–79 | 31:38 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-10 | 3-5 | 4-5 | 65.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Miami (FL) | L 81–98 | 34:49 | 23 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10-15 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 76.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Jacksonville | W 88–65 | 24:27 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-03 | FGCU | W 89–83 | 32:35 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 6-7 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-26 | Omaha | W 74–61 | 30:01 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4-9 | 3-6 | 4-6 | 61.1% |
| 2025-11-24 | James Madison | L 72–80 | 28:46 | 25 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 10-22 | 5-14 | 0-3 | 56.8% |
| 2025-11-13 | LSU | L 81–98 | 32:36 | 25 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-19 | 3-7 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Nebraska | L 66–96 | 25:06 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-13 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 42.3% |