Jaden Zimmerman
Quinnipiac · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
825:35 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 33:01
- Points per game
- 15.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.3 / 2.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 3.3 |
| Season totals | 381 | 58 | 58 | 19 | 13 | 60 | 69 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 121–330 | 36.7% | 13.2 | 16.0 |
| 2P | 75–183 | 41.0% | 7.3 | 8.9 |
| 3P | 46–147 | 31.3% | 5.9 | 7.1 |
| FT | 93–138 | 67.4% | 5.5 | 6.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.6% | 48.8% | 44.5% | 41.8% | 0.97 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Quinnipiac · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $27K
- 80% range $6K to $81K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.8%
- team pool $270K, 80% range $98K to $690K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $26K to $28K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 65.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Quinnipiac: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Quinnipiac | $27Kspeculative | $6K to $81K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.7 | -0.5 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | +0.7 | +4.4range +3.7 to +5.1 | 2,752 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Quinnipiac | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.2 | -0.1 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | +0.4 | +3.9range +3.2 to +4.7 | 1,840 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:01 | 33:01 | 20:28–39:01 | |
| Points | 10.0 | 15.2 | 4.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 21.8% | 42.7% | 0.0%–70.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Marist | L 75–77 | 32:28 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-11 | 0-4 | 2-4 | 18.2% |
| 2026-03-01 | Canisius | W 67–63 | 33:29 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-8 | 0-3 | 4-10 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | Niagara | L 76–78 | 34:30 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-14 | 0-7 | 5-7 | 21.4% |
| 2026-02-22 | Fairfield | L 79–85 | 34:36 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7-18 | 4-14 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-15 | Merrimack | L 49–56 | 35:01 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 2-13 | 1-6 | 4-4 | 19.2% |
| 2026-02-13 | Siena | W 74–62 | 33:38 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-11 | 3-6 | 4-7 | 59.1% |
| 2026-02-07 | Niagara | W 56–55 | 23:41 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-12 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-05 | Canisius | W 75–60 | 32:48 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 7-8 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Fairfield | W 72–65 | 38:15 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-14 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 39.3% |
| 2026-01-30 | Sacred Heart | L 91–98 | 33:40 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-15 | 4-10 | 6-7 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Marist | L 64–71 | 32:30 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-12 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-22 | Mount St. Mary's | W 77–62 | 31:44 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-15 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | Manhattan | W 98–92 | 39:01 | 17 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6-14 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Merrimack | L 71–83 | 36:11 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 4-6 | 45.8% |
| 2026-01-14 | Saint Peter's | L 70–74 | 35:33 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7-12 | 3-6 | 2-7 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-11 | Sacred Heart | W 70–60 | 24:11 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7-14 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 60.7% |
| 2025-12-07 | Rider | W 72–58 | 35:23 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-05 | Iona | W 89–68 | 38:37 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7-16 | 1-6 | 4-7 | 46.9% |
| 2025-11-30 · NCAA | Stonehill | W 76–62 | 36:36 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7-12 | 3-5 | 5-6 | 70.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | UCF | L 91–102 | 36:35 | 26 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-11 | 2-4 | 14-16 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-23 | Pittsburgh | W 83–75 | 30:25 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 35.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Maine | W 70–64 | 20:28 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2-11 | 1-6 | 5-7 | 22.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Yale | L 60–97 | 32:20 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7-17 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 44.1% |
| 2025-11-06 | Central Conn. St. | W 71–49 | 34:16 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-17 | 4-11 | 3-4 | 47.1% |
| 2025-11-03 | St. John's (NY) | L 74–108 | 29:39 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5-17 | 1-6 | 8-10 | 32.4% |