Washington

B10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 102 · Raw net 4.5 · Tempo 67.9 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-12

Record: 15–17; 15 wins
AdjNet: 10.1β; rank 63 of 365
AdjO: 113.5β; rank 76 of 365
AdjD: 103.5β; rank 64 of 365
AdjT: 68.0β
SOS: 7.7β; rank 44 of 363
NCSOS: -3.5β
WAB: -4.7β; rank 100 of 363
RR: -2.4β
Exp. W: 17.4β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	112.1101	107.6149	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.2185	50.4119	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.279	14.4325	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.559	28.793	30.6
FTA / FGA %	29.1328	30.883	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.0321	33.4149	33.9
2P%	53.892	50.6120	51.7
FT%	76.541	72.4177	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	34.9	38.6	39.5
Assists / FGM %	48.8	49.1	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.4	8.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	26.0	31.5	31.4
2-pointers %	56.2	50.4	48.8
Free throws %	17.8	18.1	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.0
Top Three Share of Minutes: 46%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Ark.-Pine Bluff	W 94–50	73.2	Home	1–0
11-06	Denver	W 84–70	70.4	Home	2–0
11-09	Baylor	L 69–78	71.5	Away	2–1
11-14	Washington St.	W 81–69	62.3	Away	3–1
11-18	Southern U.	W 99–93 2OT	92.5	Home	4–1
11-28	Colorado	L 68–81	68.7	Neutral	4–2
12-03	UCLA	L 80–82	65.0	Home	4–3
12-06	Southern California	W 84–76	73.1	Away	5–3
12-13	Southern Utah	W 105–69	71.3	Home	6–3
12-19	Seattle U	L 66–70	76.4	Away	6–4
12-22	San Diego	W 86–56	74.0	Home	7–4
12-29	Utah	W 74–65	68.6	Home	8–4
01-04	Indiana	L 80–90	63.7	Away	8–5
01-07	Purdue	L 73–81	70.7	Away	8–6
01-11	Ohio St.	W 81–74	64.5	Home	9–6
01-14	Michigan	L 72–82	71.2	Home	9–7
01-17	Michigan St.	L 63–80	66.9	Home	9–8
01-21	Nebraska	L 66–76	64.2	Away	9–9
01-25	Oregon	W 72–57	64.2	Home	10–9
01-29	Illinois	L 66–75	61.2	Away	10–10
01-31	Northwestern	W 76–62	65.2	Away	11–10
02-04	Iowa	L 74–84	61.1	Home	11–11
02-07	UCLA	L 73–77	65.7	Away	11–12
02-11	Penn St.	L 60–63	65.4	Home	11–13
02-14	Minnesota	W 69–57	59.9	Home	12–13
02-21	Maryland	L 60–64	56.8	Away	12–14
02-24	Rutgers	W 79–72	70.6	Away	13–14
02-28	Wisconsin	L 73–90	70.5	Home	13–15
03-04	Southern California	W 91–72	76.0	Home	14–15
03-07	Oregon	L 79–85	65.5	Away	14–16
03-11	Southern California	W 83–79 1OT	80.8	Neutral	15–16
03-12	Wisconsin	L 82–85	66.2	Neutral	15–17

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Hannes Steinbach	30	34:37	80.2%	556	353	47	32	37	59	71	191–309	61.8%	18–53	34.0%	120–158	75.9%	60.2%	64.4%	43.6%	5	36:25 +1:48	88.8%	21.0 +2.5
Quimari Peterson	32	30:52	76.3%	289	87	72	44	6	29	62	30–58	51.7%	68–199	34.2%	25–32	78.1%	51.4%	53.3%	12.5%	5	37:12 +6:20	90.7%	11.6 +2.6
Zoom Diallo	32	29:27	72.8%	500	124	142	22	0	81	86	169–320	52.8%	22–72	30.6%	96–117	82.1%	51.5%	56.4%	29.8%	5	34:57 +5:30	85.2%	21.4 +5.8
Wesley Yates III	26	30:59	62.2%	319	84	32	37	7	41	55	61–135	45.2%	49–162	30.2%	50–65	76.9%	45.3%	49.0%	21.9%	5	35:04 +4:04	85.5%	9.8 −2.5
Franck Kepnang	26	22:57	46.1%	152	165	6	15	52	25	66	62–125	49.6%	0–1	0.0%†	28–39	71.8%	49.2%	53.1%	31.0%	—	—	—	—
Bryson Tucker	21	21:58	35.6%	120	82	10	7	3	9	19	39–71	54.9%	12–46	26.1%†	6–11	54.5%†	48.7%	49.2%	9.4%	—	—	—	—
JJ Mandaquit	21	19:22	31.4%	110	42	64	12	2	25	42	30–54	55.6%†	11–39	28.2%†	17–26	65.4%	50.0%†	52.7%†	28.0%†	—	—	—	—
Lathan Sommerville	21	14:26	23.4%	94	49	4	2	8	15	43	31–62	50.0%†	1–5	20.0%†	29–37	78.4%	48.5%†	56.4%†	55.2%†	5	17:17 +2:51	42.1%	5.0 +0.5
Desmond Claude	11	27:31	23.4%	158	26	22	5	1	18	17	45–91	49.5%	9–29	31.0%†	41–47	87.2%	48.8%	56.2%	39.2%	—	—	—	—
Courtland Muldrew	20	12:30	19.3%	65	38	29	5	3	8	32	21–40	52.5%†	4–19	21.1%†	11–20	55.0%†	45.8%†	47.9%†	33.9%†	5	24:36 +12:06	60.0%	8.4 +5.2
Nikola Dzepina	14	10:48	11.7%	37	18	10	0	12	2	17	4–7	57.1%†	9–36	25.0%†	2–4	50.0%†	40.7%†	41.3%†	9.3%†	5	18:14 +7:26	44.5%	3.4 +0.8
Jacob Ognacevic	12	12:21	11.4%	37	14	3	3	0	7	17	5–9	55.6%†	8–18	44.4%†	3–5	60.0%†	63.0%†	63.4%†	18.5%†	—	—	—	—
Jasir RencherFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	7:43	4.2%	20	9	1	0	2	1	13	3–4	75.0%†	1–5	20.0%†	11–13	84.6%†	50.0%†	67.9%†	144.4%†	—	—	—	—
Brandon Roy JrFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	1:13	0.5%	5	1	0	0	0	0	0	1–1	100.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	0–0	—	50.0%†	50.0%†	0.0%†	2	1:07 −0:06	1.1%	2.5 +1.5
Team, games with logs · season totals	32 games			2462	1182	442	not published	134	333	not published	692–1286	53.8%	213–688	31.0%	439–574	76.5%	51.2%	55.3%	29.1%
Sum of players				2462	1092	442	184	133	320	540	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+90	0	not published	+1	+13	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Hannes Steinbach	80.2%	$940K	$575K to $1.60M	25.5%	$940K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Quimari Peterson	76.3%	$390K	$99K to $650K	11.7%	$390K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zoom Diallo	72.8%	$595K	$375K to $930K	16.4%	$595K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Wesley Yates III	62.4%	$305K	$65K to $500K	9.2%	$305K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Franck Kepnang	46.4%	$445K	$285K to $760K	12.1%	$445K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Bryson Tucker	35.5%	$155K	$35K to $275K	4.7%	$155K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
JJ Mandaquit	31.8%	$180K	$57K to $300K	5.5%	$180K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Desmond Claude	24.4%	$135K	$46K to $215K	4.0%	$135K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Lathan Sommerville	23.9%	$55K	$18K to $145K	1.7%	$55K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Courtland Muldrew	19.0%	$100K	$37K to $170K	3.1%	$100K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Nikola Dzepina	11.9%	$57K	$22K to $105K	1.7%	$57K in all four	$25K	Limited evidence
Jacob Ognacevic	10.6%	$58K	$25K to $98K	1.7%	$58K in all four	$25K	Limited evidence
Jasir Rencher	4.3%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Brandon Roy Jr	0.5%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Washington-Seattle Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$13,456,854
Men's basketball expenses	$11,725,277
Athletics department expenses	$174,834,634
Athletics department revenue	$178,415,083

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 32 games, 2,197 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,462	2,364
Field goals made	905	844
Field goals attempted	1,974	1,921
3-pointers made	213	248
3-pointers attempted	688	742
Free throws made	439	428
Free throws attempted	574	591
Offensive rebounds	379	324
Defensive rebounds	803	721
Total rebounds	1,182	1,045
Assists	442	414
Blocks	134	110
Turnovers	333	316
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 184.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 540.
Minutes (derived)	6,475	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,462	2,462	0	±12.3	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	905	905	0	±4.5	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,974	1,974	0	±9.9	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	213	213	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	688	688	0	±3.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	439	439	0	±2.2	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	574	574	0	±2.9	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,182	1,092	+90	±94.6	0
Assists	Reconciled	442	442	0	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	134	133	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	333	320	+13	±10.0	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	184	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	540	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,475	6,454	+21.1	±129.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Hannes Steinbach	80.2%	+4.3range +3.2 to +5.2Sufficient evidence
Quimari Peterson	76.3%	+1.1range -0.2 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Zoom Diallo	72.8%	+2.7range +1.7 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
Wesley Yates III	62.4%	+0.8range -0.6 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Franck Kepnang	46.4%	+3.4range +2.3 to +4.4Sufficient evidence
Bryson Tucker	35.5%	+0.2range -0.8 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
JJ Mandaquit	31.8%	+1.2range -0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Desmond Claude	24.4%	+0.9range -0.1 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Lathan Sommerville	23.9%	-1.7range -2.6 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Courtland Muldrew	19.0%	+0.6range -0.3 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Nikola Dzepina	11.9%	-0.3range -1.2 to +0.7Limited evidence
Jacob Ognacevic	10.6%	+0.1range -0.5 to +0.6Limited evidence
Jasir Rencher	4.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Brandon Roy Jr	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +11.1range +10.3 to +12.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 99.0% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 4.5%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value