Desmond Claude
Washington · 2025–26 · 11 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
302:37 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 11
- Minutes per game
- 27:31
- Points per game
- 14.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 2.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.4 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.9 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 158 | 26 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 18 | 17 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 54–120 | 45.0% | 10.9 | 15.9 |
| 2P | 45–91 | 49.5%† | 8.3 | 12.0 |
| 3P | 9–29 | 31.0%† | 2.6 | 3.8 |
| FT | 41–47 | 87.2% | 4.3 | 6.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.8% | 56.2% | 24.2% | 39.2% | 1.22 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Washington · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $135K
- 80% range $46K to $215K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $135K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 24.4%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Washington: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Washington | $135Kspeculative | $46K to $215K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.9 | -0.1 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -0.1 | +1.7range +1.4 to +1.9 | 1,073 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | USC | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.6 | +1.0 to +4.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +1.1 | +4.9range +4.1 to +5.8 | 3,203 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Xavier | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.3 | +1.4 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +0.9 | +4.4range +3.8 to +4.9 | 3,564 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Xavier | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.5 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | +1.2 | +2.6range +2.0 to +3.2 | 2,430 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:10 | 27:31 | 8:31–34:26 | |
| Points | 12.2 | 14.4 | 0.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 44.0% | 45.2% | 0.0%–64.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-14 | Michigan | L 72–82 | 8:31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Purdue | L 73–81 | 25:19 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-04 | Indiana | L 80–90 | 32:35 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-15 | 2-6 | 6-6 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Utah | W 74–65 | 33:38 | 21 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-14 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-22 | San Diego | W 86–56 | 25:47 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-19 | Seattle U | L 66–70 | 33:53 | 24 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9-14 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Southern Utah | W 105–69 | 22:38 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 6-7 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Southern California | W 84–76 | 33:48 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-16 | 1-4 | 5-5 | 53.1% |
| 2025-12-03 | UCLA | L 80–82 | 19:57 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-28 | Colorado | L 68–81 | 32:05 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-18 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-18 | Southern U. | W 99–93 | 34:26 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6-14 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 46.4% |