Longwood

BSth · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 187 · Raw net -0.5 · Tempo 69.4 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-06

Record: 13–16; 13 wins
AdjNet: -5.2β; rank 248 of 365
AdjO: 104.6β; rank 260 of 365
AdjD: 109.8β; rank 214 of 365
AdjT: 69.2β
SOS: -5.5β; rank 332 of 363
NCSOS: -7.2β
WAB: -11.1β; rank 240 of 363
RR: -1.8β
Exp. W: 14.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	106.2223	106.7122	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	49.7254	53.8292	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.1326	19.829	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.655	27.758	30.6
FTA / FGA %	41.339	42.1326	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.4308	33.8172	33.9
2P%	51.1209	56.1329	51.7
FT%	74.0137	69.329	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	34.8	42.6	39.5
Assists / FGM %	47.1	49.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	6.3	9.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	25.2	31.6	31.4
2-pointers %	51.2	47.0	48.8
Free throws %	23.5	21.3	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.1
Top Three Share of Minutes: 40%
Bench Share of Minutes: 37%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	Pittsburgh	L 60–78	70.1	Away	0–1
11-12	James Madison	W 82–72	70.0	Home	1–1
11-15	Binghamton	W 90–82	74.1	Home	2–1
11-18	UMES	L 82–83 2OT	80.6	Home	2–2
11-23	Columbia	L 70–95	72.4	Away	2–3
11-28	Siena	L 63–70	67.5	Neutral	2–4
11-29	Maine	W 65–61	64.0	Neutral	3–4
11-30	American	L 66–92	72.1	Away	3–5
12-06	Morgan St.	W 84–80	74.7	Away	4–5
12-13	Delaware St.	L 76–81	66.7	Home	4–6
12-17	Wake Forest	L 68–71	73.1	Away	4–7
12-20	N.C. Central	W 74–72	70.8	Away	5–7
12-31	Winthrop	W 82–70	67.6	Home	6–7
01-03	High Point	L 67–80	66.1	Away	6–8
01-07	UNC Asheville	L 61–72	63.7	Away	6–9
01-10	Presbyterian	W 77–70	63.1	Home	7–9
01-17	Radford	L 83–85	69.6	Away	7–10
01-21	Gardner-Webb	W 91–56	69.9	Home	8–10
01-23	Charleston So.	W 81–79 1OT	81.8	Home	9–10
01-29	USC Upstate	L 60–65	70.4	Away	9–11
01-31	High Point	L 59–71	63.1	Home	9–12
02-04	Gardner-Webb	W 86–66	71.0	Away	10–12
02-07	Winthrop	L 74–79	77.3	Away	10–13
02-12	UNC Asheville	L 74–79	67.5	Home	10–14
02-14	USC Upstate	W 82–75 1OT	83.7	Home	11–14
02-19	Presbyterian	L 65–72	66.5	Away	11–15
02-21	Charleston So.	W 107–96 2OT	85.0	Away	12–15
02-28	Radford	W 90–74	73.8	Home	13–15
03-06	UNC Asheville	L 82–85 1OT	76.5	Neutral	13–16

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 29 of 29 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jacoi Hutchinson	29	28:53	70.1%	16.8	4.8	4.5	1.9	0.2	2.5	2.7	105–221	47.5%	15–63	23.8%	96–112	85.7%	44.9%	52.7%	39.4%	5	32:04 +3:11	72.9%	15.8 +3.7
Elijah Tucker	29	26:52	65.2%	18.0	10.3	1.4	1.1	0.6	3.8	4.7	127–225	56.4%	1–2	50.0%†	93–133	69.9%	56.6%	61.3%	58.6%	5	25:59 −0:53	59.0%	13.4 +1.3
Emanuel Richards	29	26:10	63.5%	14.5	5.0	1.5	1.5	0.3	2.3	3.5	69–150	46.0%	25–77	32.5%	62–85	72.9%	46.9%	52.0%	37.4%	5	28:00 +1:50	63.6%	11.8 +2.3
Johan Nziemi	27	26:35	60.1%	16.2	9.0	2.7	1.7	0.5	3.1	3.6	79–156	50.6%	7–22	31.8%†	111–152	73.0%	50.3%	59.2%	85.4%	5	22:53 −3:42	52.0%	8.4 −2.3
Alphonzo Billups III	29	23:08	56.1%	13.5	4.5	2.1	2.6	0.6	2.0	3.0	43–80	53.8%	39–117	33.3%	23–36	63.9%	51.5%	53.1%	18.3%	5	29:12 +6:04	66.4%	11.2 +3.4
Redd Thompson Jr.	29	21:46	52.8%	19.2	2.9	3.5	1.0	0.0	3.4	3.5	50–106	47.2%	44–136	32.4%	71–81	87.7%	47.9%	54.6%	33.5%	5	27:10 +5:24	61.7%	10.8 +0.4
Jaylen Benard	29	19:37	47.6%	14.8	7.2	1.8	1.3	0.5	2.0	4.1	40–66	60.6%	39–119	32.8%	14–26	53.8%	53.2%	53.7%	14.1%	5	23:59 +4:22	54.5%	8.4 +1.1
Elijah Jones	25	17:03	35.7%	8.5	8.3	1.7	1.6	0.6	1.5	6.6	25–49	51.0%†	5–15	33.3%†	26–41	63.4%	50.8%†	55.5%†	64.1%†	5	14:54 −2:09	33.9%	1.4 −2.2
Elijah Kelly	28	10:30	24.6%	7.8	6.1	1.2	2.7	0.3	1.5	3.3	10–17	58.8%†	10–31	32.3%†	7–12	58.3%†	52.1%†	53.5%†	25.0%†	5	10:15 −0:15	23.3%	2.0 0.0
Jaylin Payne	26	7:06	15.5%	8.0	8.0	1.1	1.1	0.2	2.6	7.1	15–26	57.7%†	0–2	0.0%†	7–12	58.3%†	53.6%†	55.6%†	42.9%†	5	4:32 −2:34	10.3%	2.0 +0.6
KJ McClurgFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	12:32	3.1%	4.3	5.3	2.1	1.1	0.0	0.0	3.2	1–4	25.0%†	0–5	0.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	11.1%†	20.2%†	22.2%†	—	—	—	—
Isaiah KalalaUnder 100 minutes	12	2:19	2.3%	4.3	11.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.4	7.2	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	3–4	75.0%†	0.0%†	54.3%†	400.0%†	1	1:02 −1:17	0.5%	0.0 −0.3
Jerome WilliamsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	2:41	1.6%	6.4	2.1	2.1	0.0	0.0	2.1	6.4	0–3	0.0%†	0–0	—	3–4	75.0%†	0.0%†	31.5%†	133.3%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	29 games			73.7	35.4	11.8	not published	1.9	13.3	not published	564–1104	51.1%	185–589	31.4%	518–700	74.0%	49.7%	55.0%	41.3%
Sum of players				73.7	32.3	11.8	8.0	1.9	12.7	19.5	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.1	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $235K; 80% Range $86K to $620K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $215K to $305K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

The widest scenario range, $115K to $810K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jacoi Hutchinson	70.9%	$42K	$13K to $135K	17.3%	$38K to $55K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Elijah Tucker	65.9%	$20K	$3K to $68K	11.0%	$18K to $26K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Emanuel Richards	64.0%	$5K	$1K to $33K	2.4%	$5K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Johan Nziemi	61.3%	$37K	$12K to $120K	15.3%	$34K to $49K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alphonzo Billups III	55.9%	$20K	$3K to $71K	10.3%	$19K to $27K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Redd Thompson Jr.	52.2%	$39K	$12K to $130K	15.2%	$35K to $50K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaylen Benard	47.5%	$7K	$1K to $33K	4.3%	$6K to $9K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Elijah Jones	34.6%	$7K	$1K to $28K	4.4%	$7K to $9K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Elijah Kelly	25.7%	$13K	$3K to $41K	5.8%	$12K to $17K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaylin Payne	14.9%	$5K	$1K to $16K	2.7%	$5K to $7K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
KJ McClurg	3.4%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Kalala	2.3%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jerome Williams	1.5%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$235K	$86K to $620K	100%	$215K to $305K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Longwood University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$4,627,089
Men's basketball expenses	$4,053,871
Athletics department expenses	$19,935,846
Athletics department revenue	$20,058,176

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 29 games, 2,073 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1195 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	73.7	74.0
Field goals made	25.1	25.2
Field goals attempted	56.7	54.1
3-pointers made	6.2	7.8
3-pointers attempted	19.7	23.1
Free throws made	17.3	15.8
Free throws attempted	23.4	22.8
Offensive rebounds	11.9	9.0
Defensive rebounds	23.5	22.5
Total rebounds	35.4	31.5
Assists	11.8	12.6
Blocks	1.9	3.5
Turnovers	13.3	13.7
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 240.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 582.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

29 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,201	2,201	0	±11.0	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	749	749	0	±3.7	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,693	1,693	0	±8.5	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	185	185	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	589	589	0	±2.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	518	518	0	±2.6	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	700	700	0	±3.5	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,058	965	+93	±84.6	0
Assists	Reconciled	353	353	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	58	57	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	396	380	+16	±11.9	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	240	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	582	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,975	5,954	+21.4	±119.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jacoi Hutchinson	70.9%	+1.4range +0.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Elijah Tucker	65.9%	-0.2range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Emanuel Richards	64.0%	-2.7range -4.6 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Johan Nziemi	61.3%	+1.3range +0.2 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Alphonzo Billups III	55.9%	+0.2range -1.3 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Redd Thompson Jr.	52.2%	+2.0range +0.6 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Jaylen Benard	47.5%	-1.3range -2.4 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Elijah Jones	34.6%	-0.8range -1.8 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Elijah Kelly	25.7%	+0.7range -0.4 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Jaylin Payne	14.9%	-0.4range -1.0 to +0.2Limited evidence
KJ McClurg	3.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Isaiah Kalala	2.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jerome Williams	1.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.4range +8.5 to +10.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.6% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value