Johan Nziemi
Longwood · 2025–26 · 27 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
717:41 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 27
- Minutes per game
- 26:35
- Points per game
- 10.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.0 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.7 | 6.0 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.2 | 9.0 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 290 | 162 | 49 | 30 | 9 | 55 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 86–178 | 48.3% | 6.6 | 9.9 |
| 2P | 79–156 | 50.6% | 5.8 | 8.7 |
| 3P | 7–22 | 31.8%† | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| FT | 111–152 | 73.0% | 5.6 | 8.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.3% | 59.2% | 12.4% | 85.4% | 0.89 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Longwood · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $37K
- 80% range $12K to $120K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.3%
- team pool $235K, 80% range $86K to $620K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $34K to $49K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 61.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Longwood: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Longwood | $37Kspeculative | $12K to $120K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.3 | +0.2 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +1.2 | +4.0range +3.5 to +4.5 | 2,458 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Longwood | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.2 | +0.9 to +3.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +1.1 | +2.3range +2.0 to +2.7 | 1,525 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 22:53 | 26:35 | 15:11–34:45 | |
| Points | 8.4 | 10.7 | 3.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.0% | 50.7% | 12.5%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | UNC Asheville | L 82–85 | 29:57 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Radford | W 90–74 | 15:11 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Charleston So. | W 107–96 | 21:02 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | Presbyterian | L 65–72 | 26:18 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 85.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | USC Upstate | W 82–75 | 21:57 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-12 | UNC Asheville | L 74–79 | 22:59 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 6-9 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Winthrop | L 74–79 | 30:25 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 6-12 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Gardner-Webb | W 86–66 | 28:28 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-12 | 1-2 | 3-5 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-31 | High Point | L 59–71 | 28:43 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | USC Upstate | L 60–65 | 31:34 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-23 | Charleston So. | W 81–79 | 29:30 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-1 | 10-12 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-21 | Gardner-Webb | W 91–56 | 23:19 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Radford | L 83–85 | 32:57 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Presbyterian | W 77–70 | 24:13 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | UNC Asheville | L 61–72 | 30:55 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-8 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | High Point | L 67–80 | 27:29 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Winthrop | W 82–70 | 20:09 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | N.C. Central | W 74–72 | 34:45 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 8-10 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Wake Forest | L 68–71 | 29:03 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 7-8 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Delaware St. | L 76–81 | 31:44 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | Morgan St. | W 84–80 | 26:11 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 9-15 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | American | L 66–92 | 26:28 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 8-10 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Siena | L 63–70 | 15:29 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | UMES | L 82–83 | 31:43 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-1 | 10-10 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | Binghamton | W 90–82 | 21:29 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | James Madison | W 82–72 | 24:13 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 7-8 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Pittsburgh | L 60–78 | 31:30 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-13 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 53.8% |