Jacoi Hutchinson
Longwood · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
837:34 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 28:53
- Points per game
- 12.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 3.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.1 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.8 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 351 | 100 | 95 | 40 | 4 | 52 | 56 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 120–284 | 42.3% | 9.8 | 13.6 |
| 2P | 105–221 | 47.5% | 7.6 | 10.6 |
| 3P | 15–63 | 23.8% | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| FT | 96–112 | 85.7% | 3.9 | 5.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.9% | 52.7% | 22.2% | 39.4% | 1.83 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Longwood · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $42K
- 80% range $13K to $135K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.3%
- team pool $235K, 80% range $86K to $620K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $38K to $55K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Longwood: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Longwood | $42Kspeculative | $13K to $135K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.4 | +0.1 to +2.8 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +0.4 | +4.6range +4.0 to +5.1 | 2,842 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | G Washington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.3 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | +0.0 | +2.6range +2.1 to +3.2 | 2,260 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | G Washington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.7 | -2.0 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -1.0 | +2.3range +1.7 to +2.9 | 2,640 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:04 | 28:53 | 21:01–39:35 | |
| Points | 15.8 | 12.1 | 2.0–36.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.5% | 45.1% | 11.1%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | UNC Asheville | L 82–85 | 39:34 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Radford | W 90–74 | 26:37 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1-8 | 0-3 | 6-6 | 12.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Charleston So. | W 107–96 | 39:34 | 36 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 12-22 | 1-2 | 11-11 | 56.8% |
| 2026-02-19 | Presbyterian | L 65–72 | 22:06 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | USC Upstate | W 82–75 | 32:30 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-11 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 18.2% |
| 2026-02-12 | UNC Asheville | L 74–79 | 31:34 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 38.9% |
| 2026-02-07 | Winthrop | L 74–79 | 28:05 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 36.4% |
| 2026-02-04 | Gardner-Webb | W 86–66 | 30:12 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-10 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | High Point | L 59–71 | 21:01 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | USC Upstate | L 60–65 | 25:22 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-23 | Charleston So. | W 81–79 | 35:12 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4-13 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 30.8% |
| 2026-01-21 | Gardner-Webb | W 91–56 | 25:52 | 14 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Radford | L 83–85 | 35:44 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-11 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 40.9% |
| 2026-01-10 | Presbyterian | W 77–70 | 26:39 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-07 | UNC Asheville | L 61–72 | 26:32 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | High Point | L 67–80 | 27:49 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-31 | Winthrop | W 82–70 | 28:49 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-20 | N.C. Central | W 74–72 | 26:04 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7-12 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-17 | Wake Forest | L 68–71 | 30:58 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-9 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 11.1% |
| 2025-12-13 | Delaware St. | L 76–81 | 26:16 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | Morgan St. | W 84–80 | 26:25 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 7-8 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-30 | American | L 66–92 | 25:09 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 38.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | Maine | W 65–61 | 31:39 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Siena | L 63–70 | 27:07 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 4-5 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-23 | Columbia | L 70–95 | 23:24 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-18 | UMES | L 82–83 | 39:35 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 10-10 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | Binghamton | W 90–82 | 28:39 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-11 | 0-4 | 4-6 | 36.4% |
| 2025-11-12 | James Madison | W 82–72 | 21:19 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Pittsburgh | L 60–78 | 27:47 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 55.6% |