Columbia

Ivy · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 144 · Raw net 2.0 · Tempo 67.1 · 26 Division I games · Through 2026-03-06

Record: 14–12; 14 wins
AdjNet: 0.8β; rank 159 of 365
AdjO: 109.3β; rank 149 of 365
AdjD: 108.5β; rank 186 of 365
AdjT: 67.9β
SOS: -1.1β; rank 201 of 363
NCSOS: -1.9β
WAB: -6.4β; rank 140 of 363
RR: -0.5β
Exp. W: 14.5β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	110.5126	108.5181	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	53.586	51.2167	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.3333	15.0287	16.7
Offensive rebound %	36.123	27.241	30.6
FTA / FGA %	28.6338	33.5140	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.960	35.2257	33.9
2P%	53.2119	50.3109	51.7
FT%	70.1271	74.8304	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	37.5	36.0	39.5
Assists / FGM %	54.3	57.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.0	9.9	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	31.9	29.8	31.4
2-pointers %	52.4	50.5	48.8
Free throws %	15.8	19.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 34%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	New Haven	W 71–53	65.6	Away	1–0
11-10	UConn	L 62–89	66.6	Away	1–1
11-13	UMass Lowell	W 86–72	69.5	Home	2–1
11-18	Boston U.	W 54–49	59.4	Home	3–1
11-21	Lehigh	W 82–67	68.5	Away	4–1
11-23	Longwood	W 95–70	72.4	Home	5–1
11-26	Fairfield	W 106–77	71.1	Away	6–1
12-03	Hofstra	W 72–70	66.0	Home	7–1
12-06	UAlbany	W 93–65	68.9	Home	8–1
12-09	Stony Brook	L 73–77 1OT	79.0	Away	8–2
12-21	California	L 56–74	67.1	Away	8–3
12-28	North Florida	W 90–82	71.8	Away	9–3
01-05	Cornell	W 104–99	82.6	Away	10–3
01-10	Harvard	L 54–79	60.2	Home	10–4
01-17	Brown	L 80–86 1OT	73.1	Away	10–5
01-19	Yale	L 74–91	64.5	Away	10–6
01-24	Dartmouth	W 79–69	71.4	Away	11–6
01-30	Penn	W 72–67	67.0	Home	12–6
01-31	Princeton	L 68–80	62.0	Home	12–7
02-07	Cornell	L 67–88	65.7	Home	12–8
02-13	Penn	L 67–76	70.4	Away	12–9
02-14	Princeton	W 75–65	56.3	Away	13–9
02-21	Dartmouth	L 63–64	67.2	Home	13–10
02-27	Brown	W 80–62	68.1	Home	14–10
02-28	Yale	L 54–60	60.7	Home	14–11
03-06	Harvard	L 71–81	67.4	Away	14–12

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 26 of 26 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Kenny Noland	26	34:14	84.8%	17.7	3.5	3.6	1.4	0.0	2.6	1.4	92–179	51.4%	69–183	37.7%	70–76	92.1%	54.0%	58.3%	21.0%	5	38:07 +3:53	95.3%	17.2 −0.5
Blair Thompson	26	31:56	79.1%	11.5	4.7	1.2	1.0	0.5	0.8	2.0	69–115	60.0%	41–104	39.4%	38–60	63.3%	59.6%	60.9%	27.4%	5	33:04 +1:08	82.7%	13.8 +2.3
Mason Ritter	26	24:34	60.8%	6.9	5.0	1.7	0.2	0.5	1.8	2.7	69–119	58.0%	2–13	15.4%†	36–54	66.7%	54.5%	57.8%	40.9%	5	28:20 +3:46	70.8%	7.2 +0.3
Miles Franklin	24	24:08	55.2%	9.4	4.1	1.0	0.9	0.5	1.0	2.8	73–140	52.1%	15–63	23.8%	35–53	66.0%	47.0%	49.9%	26.1%	5	28:47 +4:39	72.0%	9.2 −0.2
Gerard O'Keefe	25	21:26	51.0%	7.9	1.8	0.9	0.2	0.0	0.6	0.6	37–68	54.4%	36–88	40.9%	15–22	68.2%†	58.3%	59.5%	14.1%	4	13:01 −8:25	26.0%	4.0 −3.9
Connor Igoe	26	20:24	50.5%	8.2	5.4	2.8	0.7	0.2	1.9	2.8	61–114	53.5%	15–43	34.9%†	45–71	63.4%	53.2%	56.3%	45.2%	5	27:29 +7:06	68.7%	10.8 +2.6
Ryan Soulis	24	20:05	45.9%	5.5	4.4	1.5	0.5	1.0	1.2	1.8	48–87	55.2%	6–26	23.1%†	19–30	63.3%	50.4%	52.7%	26.5%	3	13:18 −6:48	19.9%	2.0 −3.5
Hampton Sanders	26	14:25	35.7%	4.2	1.7	1.8	0.5	0.0	1.1	1.3	18–43	41.9%†	16–40	40.0%†	26–34	76.5%	50.6%†	56.1%†	41.0%†	5	15:54 +1:28	39.7%	3.6 −0.6
Richard Nweke	18	8:09	14.0%	2.1	1.8	0.4	0.3	0.4	0.3	0.9	13–30	43.3%†	0–0	—	11–16	68.8%†	43.3%†	49.9%†	53.3%†	4	6:16 −1:53	12.5%	1.5 −0.6
Zine Eddine BedriFew games	5	24:02	11.4%	12.8	7.4	2.2	0.6	0.4	4.2	2.2	21–37	56.8%†	4–9	44.4%†	10–17	58.8%†	58.7%†	59.8%†	37.0%†	—	—	—	—
Avery BrownFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	14:19	4.1%	4.3	2.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	1–7	14.3%†	3–4	75.0%†	2–4	50.0%†	50.0%†	50.9%†	36.4%†	—	—	—	—
Leland ColemanUnder 100 minutes	13	3:17	4.1%	0.9	0.6	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.2	0.5	6–15	40.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	35.3%†	35.3%†	0.0%†	5	4:32 +1:15	11.3%	1.2 +0.3
Josiah CunninghamFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	3:42	1.4%	1.0	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.8	0.0	2–4	50.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	40.0%†	36.8%†	20.0%†	—	—	—	—
Edwin BaiFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	1:23	0.3%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.5	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	26 games			74.9	37.4	15.0	not published	3.0	13.1	not published	510–958	53.2%	207–576	35.9%	307–438	70.1%	53.5%	56.4%	28.6%
Sum of players				74.9	33.1	15.0	5.7	3.0	12.3	16.7	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+4.3	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.8	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Columbia University in the City of New York (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,169,578	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,169,578
Athletics department expenses	$43,349,775
Athletics department revenue	$43,349,775

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 26 games, 1,762 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	74.9	73.5
Field goals made	27.6	25.9
Field goals attempted	59.0	57.7
3-pointers made	8.0	7.3
3-pointers attempted	22.2	20.8
Free throws made	11.8	14.5
Free throws attempted	16.8	19.3
Offensive rebounds	12.2	9.4
Defensive rebounds	25.2	21.7
Total rebounds	37.4	31.1
Assists	15.0	15.0
Blocks	3.0	3.7
Turnovers	13.1	10.2
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 149.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 434.
Minutes (derived)	201.9	not published

26 of 26 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,948	1,948	0	±9.7	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	717	717	0	±3.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,534	1,534	0	±7.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	207	207	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	576	576	0	±2.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	307	307	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	438	438	0	±2.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	973	861	+112	±77.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	389	389	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	77	77	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	341	319	+22	±10.2	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	149	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	434	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,250	5,231	+18.5	±105.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Kenny Noland	85.4%	+1.3range +0.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
Blair Thompson	80.3%	-0.5range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Mason Ritter	61.3%	-0.3range -1.1 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Miles Franklin	55.5%	+0.9range -0.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Connor Igoe	50.7%	+2.0range +0.6 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Gerard O'Keefe	50.6%	-0.8range -2.1 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Ryan Soulis	45.6%	+2.2range +1.1 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Hampton Sanders	35.4%	+0.4range -0.6 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Richard Nweke	13.7%	+0.2range -0.5 to +1.2Limited evidence
Zine Eddine Bedri	11.9%	+0.5range -0.5 to +1.2Limited evidence
Avery Brown	4.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Leland Coleman	3.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Josiah Cunningham	1.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Edwin Bai	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.9range +8.9 to +10.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.1% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.9%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 5.1%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value