Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Monmouth

CAA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 150 · Raw net 1.5 · Tempo 67.2 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-10

All seasons
Record
18–15
18 wins
AdjNet
0.2β
rank 173 of 365
AdjO
106.3β
rank 219 of 365
AdjD
106.1β
rank 115 of 365
AdjT
67.8β
SOS
-1.3β
rank 206 of 363
NCSOS
-2.0β
WAB
-8.5β
rank 197 of 363
RR
0.0β
Exp. W
18.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.106.0230104.576108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%49.625950.110351.4
TO / 100 poss.16.617319.92716.7
Offensive rebound %31.215632.828930.6
FTA / FGA %32.724432.211135.0
Shooting
3P%34.215733.917533.9
2P%48.729249.68251.7
FT%75.08272.518572.5
Style
3PA / FGA %34.438.339.5
Assists / FGM %53.651.152.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %11.98.79.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %28.531.531.4
2-pointers %51.649.648.8
Free throws %19.818.919.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.2
Top Three Share of Minutes
48%
Bench Share of Minutes
29%
Players with Logged Minutes
16

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-08La SalleL 60–7366.2Away0–1
11-13Seton HallL 58–7066.8Away0–2
11-18SyracuseL 73–7870.8Away0–3
11-23Robert MorrisW 71–70 1OT68.8Home1–3
11-28Ball St.W 80–7366.4Neutral2–3
11-29Le MoyneL 79–8368.4Neutral2–4
11-30LafayetteW 88–7470.6Away3–4
12-03PrincetonW 63–5867.2Home4–4
12-06Georgia TechL 67–7970.7Away4–5
12-14FairfieldL 65–7363.4Away4–6
12-17QuinnipiacL 75–8572.0Home4–7
12-21LehighW 76–6267.3Home5–7
12-31CampbellL 65–6864.8Home5–8
01-03TowsonW 62–4863.4Away6–8
01-08William & MaryW 81–7072.1Home7–8
01-10HofstraL 64–67 1OT71.3Away7–9
01-15DrexelL 51–7359.6Home7–10
01-19NortheasternW 81–6871.7Home8–10
01-22HamptonL 63–6564.6Away8–11
01-24CampbellW 88–7372.1Away9–11
01-29N.C. A&TW 83–81 1OT74.4Home10–11
01-31HofstraL 57–7365.0Home10–12
02-05Stony BrookW 76–7571.8Away11–12
02-12DrexelW 93–7371.7Away12–12
02-15TowsonW 72–7165.0Home13–12
02-19UNCWL 69–7972.0Away13–13
02-21Col. of CharlestonL 63–7467.4Away13–14
02-26Stony BrookW 82–6967.5Home14–14
02-28ElonW 73–5763.1Home15–14
03-03NortheasternW 89–8367.0Away16–14
03-08DrexelW 65–5764.6Neutral17–14
03-09CampbellW 74–6467.2Neutral18–14
03-10HofstraL 69–7566.4Neutral18–15

Roster · 16 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groupsMinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Jason Rivera-Torres3335:3788.1%17.99.13.32.21.22.12.8121–26445.8%51–16231.5%130–16280.2%46.4%52.8%38.0%534:54 −0:4487.2%16.2 +0.3
Jack Collins3035:0979.0%7.95.35.01.80.53.02.320–5040.0%40–14028.6%47–7265.3%42.1%46.7%37.9%533:58 −1:1184.9%5.2 −1.7
Justin Ray3328:4371.0%15.53.01.71.50.20.93.359–12945.7%62–15240.8%64–7288.9%54.1%58.8%25.6%523:40 −5:0459.2%11.6 +0.4
Cornelius Robinson Jr.3225:2961.1%12.96.32.01.20.32.13.598–20946.9%5–1631.3%†52–8164.2%46.9%50.5%36.0%48:34 −16:5517.1%0.8 −7.5
Stefanos Spartalis3123:4054.9%17.88.41.61.00.72.75.3117–25046.8%3–1520.0%†83–9686.5%45.8%53.1%36.2%527:55 +4:1569.8%13.0 +2.5
Andrew Ball3320:2950.6%15.47.31.21.21.21.52.379–12463.7%24–7830.8%30–5060.0%56.9%58.0%24.8%522:37 +2:0856.5%5.8 −2.1
Dok Muordar3212:3530.1%13.36.90.40.74.01.33.350–9453.2%†0–0—34–5364.2%53.2%†57.1%†56.4%†510:33 −2:0126.4%3.4 −0.8
Kavion McClain1135:3229.3%19.23.26.12.00.04.02.447–8058.8%24–6338.1%22–2684.6%58.0%60.9%18.2%535:51 +0:2089.6%17.4 +0.3
Anthony Martinez246:4012.0%3.01.53.81.30.02.34.33–1618.8%†1–1100.0%†3–560.0%†26.5%†31.3%†29.4%†14:13 −2:272.1%2.0 +1.5
Corey MillerFew games813:278.1%10.82.62.60.70.00.73.07–1258.3%†4–757.1%†3–475.0%†68.4%†69.8%†21.1%†11:19 −12:070.7%0.0 −3.6
Jinup DobuolUnder 100 minutes185:297.4%20.66.51.60.82.81.62.810–2147.6%†10–2147.6%†1–250.0%†59.5%†59.5%†4.8%†14:58 −0:312.5%2.0 −0.8
O'Marion HarveyUnder 100 minutes133:243.3%0.96.30.90.90.03.66.30–0—0–0—1–250.0%†—56.8%†—————
Zubayr GriffinFew gamesUnder 100 minutes92:351.7%12.15.23.40.00.03.41.72–366.7%†1–425.0%†0–0—50.0%†50.0%†0.0%†————
Lucas OrchardFew gamesUnder 100 minutes81:060.7%13.613.60.04.50.00.00.00–30.0%†1–1100.0%†0–10.0%†37.5%†33.8%†25.0%†11:37 +0:310.8%0.0 −0.4
Jack LeahyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes81:060.7%0.04.64.60.00.00.09.10–30.0%†0–0—0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†11:35 +0:290.8%0.0 0.0
Quinn PetersFew gamesUnder 100 minutes81:060.7%4.64.60.00.00.00.00.00–10.0%†0–0—1–250.0%†0.0%†26.6%†200.0%†11:35 +0:290.8%0.0 −0.1
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes33 games71.234.113.5not published4.211.1not published613–125948.7%226–66034.2%471–62875.0%49.6%54.1%32.7%
Sum of players71.230.813.57.64.210.715.8Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.3−0.1not published0.0+0.5not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$295K
80% Range $105K to $785K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$290K to $300K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
16
5 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Jason Rivera-Torres88.2%$78K$27K to $220K25.1%$76K to $79K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jack Collins78.2%$26K$4K to $85K11.2%$25K to $26K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Justin Ray71.7%$32K$8K to $99K12.8%$32K to $33K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cornelius Robinson Jr.62.4%$14K$1K to $54K6.7%$13K to $14K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Stefanos Spartalis55.1%$10K$1K to $43K4.4%$10K in all four$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Andrew Ball51.9%$50K$16K to $160K15.5%$49K to $51K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dok Muordar29.8%$20K$6K to $57K6.8%$19K to $20K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kavion McClain29.3%$17K$5K to $52K6.2%$17K to $18K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Anthony Martinez10.9%$3K$1K to $10K0.9%$3K in all four$2KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Corey Miller8.6%$6K$2K to $18K2.2%$6K in all four$2KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jinup Dobuol7.5%$7K$2K to $19K2.2%$6K to $7K$2KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
O'Marion Harvey2.6%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Zubayr Griffin1.8%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Lucas Orchard0.6%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jack Leahy0.6%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Quinn Peters0.6%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$295K$105K to $785K100%$290K to $300K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Monmouth University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$3,796,957Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$3,796,957
Athletics department expenses$35,866,896
Athletics department revenue$35,866,896

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 33 games, 2,241 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1335 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points71.270.1
Field goals made25.124.7
Field goals attempted57.556.8
3-pointers made6.87.4
3-pointers attempted19.821.8
Free throws made14.113.3
Free throws attempted18.818.3
Offensive rebounds10.811.3
Defensive rebounds23.323.9
Total rebounds34.135.2
Assists13.512.6
Blocks4.23.3
Turnovers11.113.4
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 252.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 528.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3752,3750±11.90
Field goals madeReconciled8398390±4.20
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,9191,9190±9.60
3-pointers madeReconciled2262260±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6606600±3.30
Free throws madeReconciled4714710±2.40
Free throws attemptedReconciled6286280±3.10
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,1371,027+110±91.00
AssistsReconciled450452−2±2.30
BlocksReconciled1391390±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown372356+16±11.20
StealsNo team figurenot published252not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published528not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,6756,656+18.6±133.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Jason Rivera-Torres88.2%+2.7range +1.7 to +3.8Sufficient evidence
Jack Collins78.2%+0.2range -0.6 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Justin Ray71.7%+1.0range -0.2 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Cornelius Robinson Jr.62.4%-0.8range -2.0 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Stefanos Spartalis55.1%-1.2range -2.6 to +0.0Sufficient evidence
Andrew Ball51.9%+3.0range +1.9 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Dok Muordar29.8%+1.8range +0.7 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Kavion McClain29.3%+1.5range +0.5 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Anthony Martinez10.9%-2.2range -3.2 to -1.3Limited evidence
Corey Miller8.6%+1.3range +0.4 to +2.3Limited evidence
Jinup Dobuol7.5%+1.8range +1.2 to +2.5Limited evidence
O'Marion Harvey2.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Zubayr Griffin1.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Lucas Orchard0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jack Leahy0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Quinn Peters0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+10.3range +9.4 to +11.2Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.7% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 5.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value