Jack Collins
Monmouth · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1054:39 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 35:09
- Points per game
- 6.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.6 / 4.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.9 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 7.9 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 |
| Season totals | 207 | 139 | 132 | 47 | 13 | 80 | 61 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 60–190 | 31.6% | 6.3 | 7.2 |
| 2P | 20–50 | 40.0%† | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| 3P | 40–140 | 28.6% | 4.7 | 5.3 |
| FT | 47–72 | 65.3% | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.1% | 46.7% | 73.7% | 37.9% | 1.65 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Monmouth NJ · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $26K
- 80% range $4K to $85K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.2%
- team pool $295K, 80% range $105K to $785K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $25K to $26K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 78.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Monmouth NJ: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Monmouth NJ | $26Kspeculative | $4K to $85K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.2 | -0.6 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.1 | +6.1range +5.5 to +6.8 | 3,197 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Monmouth NJ | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.3 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.9 | +4.2range +3.5 to +4.9 | 3,681 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Monmouth NJ | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | +0.1 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +0.2 | +4.2range +3.6 to +5.1 | 3,346 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Monmouth NJ | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -2.0 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.4 | +1.7range +1.3 to +2.1 | 2,979 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:58 | 35:09 | 22:43–43:57 | |
| Points | 5.2 | 6.9 | 0.0–17.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 34.3% | 41.4% | 0.0%–75.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Hofstra | L 69–75 | 40:00 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-09 | Campbell | W 74–64 | 38:24 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-08 | Drexel | W 65–57 | 35:14 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | Northeastern | W 89–83 | 30:04 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | Elon | W 73–57 | 26:10 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-26 | Stony Brook | W 82–69 | 28:02 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Col. of Charleston | L 63–74 | 34:23 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | UNCW | L 69–79 | 28:31 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-15 | Towson | W 72–71 | 26:40 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Drexel | W 93–73 | 22:57 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-05 | Stony Brook | W 76–75 | 36:58 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-9 | 2-9 | 2-3 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Campbell | W 88–73 | 39:58 | 17 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 4-8 | 65.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Hampton | L 63–65 | 36:04 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-5 | 2-6 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-19 | Northeastern | W 81–68 | 22:43 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Drexel | L 51–73 | 38:01 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 21.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | Hofstra | L 64–67 | 43:57 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | William & Mary | W 81–70 | 35:42 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Towson | W 62–48 | 29:52 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 4-6 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Campbell | L 65–68 | 39:59 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-7 | 2-6 | 4-5 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-17 | Quinnipiac | L 75–85 | 36:26 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 7-7 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-14 | Fairfield | L 65–73 | 35:21 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Georgia Tech | L 67–79 | 39:28 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Princeton | W 63–58 | 36:38 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | Lafayette | W 88–74 | 36:37 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | Le Moyne | L 79–83 | 38:08 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-7 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-28 | Ball St. | W 80–73 | 37:40 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Robert Morris | W 71–70 | 43:49 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Syracuse | L 73–78 | 38:12 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-13 · NCAA | Seton Hall | L 58–70 | 39:06 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-9 | 3-8 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | La Salle | L 60–73 | 39:35 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1-8 | 0-5 | 3-3 | 12.5% |