Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Southern Ill.

MVC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 122 · Raw net 3.2 · Tempo 69.8 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-05

All seasons
Record
15–16
15 wins
AdjNet
4.2β
rank 107 of 365
AdjO
104.7β
rank 253 of 365
AdjD
100.5β
rank 31 of 365
AdjT
69.7β
SOS
1.7β
rank 119 of 363
NCSOS
0.2β
WAB
-7.8β
rank 173 of 363
RR
-1.9β
Exp. W
16.9β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.102.928999.826108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%49.228549.06951.4
TO / 100 poss.17.020818.57516.7
Offensive rebound %30.916627.34530.6
FTA / FGA %31.327531.49635.0
Shooting
3P%27.836330.41733.9
2P%52.216151.516151.7
FT%68.332069.53272.5
Style
3PA / FGA %29.241.539.5
Assists / FGM %48.652.152.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %10.08.59.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %20.431.631.4
2-pointers %61.850.248.8
Free throws %17.818.219.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.1
Top Three Share of Minutes
42%
Bench Share of Minutes
36%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-07Kansas CityW 101–7876.1Home1–0
11-12NevadaL 81–86 1OT78.7Away1–1
11-17North Dakota St.L 85–9277.6Away1–2
11-23DelawareW 79–5968.1Neutral2–2
11-24UABL 73–8170.3Neutral2–3
11-26MemphisL 58–7470.1Away2–4
11-29Little RockW 74–6563.9Home3–4
12-03High PointW 86–8474.0Away4–4
12-10UT MartinW 83–5469.8Home5–4
12-13RichmondL 84–93 1OT87.3Away5–5
12-18Illinois St.L 68–7570.0Home5–6
12-21BradleyL 69–7371.5Away5–7
12-29Murray St.L 81–8474.5Away5–8
01-01ValparaisoW 75–7074.9Home6–8
01-04BelmontW 68–6769.3Away7–8
01-07UICL 57–7064.7Away7–9
01-14DrakeL 73–76 1OT79.1Home7–10
01-17BelmontL 68–7369.2Home7–11
01-21ValparaisoL 63–6963.8Away7–12
01-28UNIW 65–5065.6Home8–12
01-31UICL 66–6865.9Home8–13
02-03Illinois St.W 54–5067.9Away9–13
02-06Murray St.L 81–9173.1Home9–14
02-09Indiana St.W 80–6574.7Away10–14
02-12EvansvilleW 86–6068.1Home11–14
02-15BradleyL 60–7069.2Home11–15
02-18DrakeW 66–6170.6Away12–15
02-21UNIW 59–5761.3Away13–15
02-25Indiana St.W 66–5570.7Home14–15
03-01EvansvilleW 81–6763.9Away15–15
03-05DrakeL 63–6764.4Neutral15–16

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groupsMinutesSeason TotalsShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Drew Steffe3131:0476.7%30893782813497063–11455.3%47–15829.7%41–6167.2%49.1%51.5%22.4%536:51 +5:4792.1%11.6 +1.7
Quel'Ron House2930:3670.7%43799964746856163–32949.5%13–5324.5%72–9774.2%47.8%51.5%25.4%533:33 +2:5783.9%17.2 +2.1
Rolyns Aligbe3124:4261.0%292235222820377886–17150.3%24–6934.8%48–7167.6%50.8%53.8%29.6%526:21 +1:3965.9%4.6 −4.8
Damien Mayo Jr.3025:3061.0%2788666449397966–12752.0%36–9537.9%38–4879.2%54.1%57.2%21.6%526:00 +0:3065.0%12.2 +2.9
Prince Aligbe2922:1851.5%21215521119445383–16949.1%0–170.0%†46–8057.5%44.6%47.9%43.0%520:50 −1:2852.1%5.2 −2.1
Jalen Haynes3120:3650.9%2467566316414369–12356.1%14–7219.4%66–8577.6%46.2%52.9%43.6%518:48 −1:4747.0%5.8 −2.1
Davion Sykes3118:5646.8%22013723287304690–16654.2%0–80.0%†40–5671.4%51.7%55.4%32.2%519:27 +0:3248.6%8.0 +0.9
Isaiah Stafford1518:4122.3%1124012101132530–5455.6%†10–4522.2%†22–3073.3%45.5%†49.9%†30.3%†————
Max Pikaar2610:4222.2%44489101712268–1844.4%†6–2326.1%†10–1662.5%†41.5%†45.8%†39.0%†45:45 −4:5611.5%0.8 −0.9
Jorge Moreno2410:4820.6%67681168193227–4264.3%†0–0—13–2846.4%64.3%†61.7%†66.7%†24:03 −6:454.0%0.0 −2.8
Jaheem Webber186:539.9%2229521231810–1758.8%†0–0—2–825.0%†58.8%†53.6%†47.1%†510:32 +3:3926.3%1.8 +0.6
Caden HawkinsUnder 100 minutes144:425.2%154420441–333.3%†3–1030.0%†4–944.4%†42.3%†44.2%†69.2%†31:19 −3:222.0%0.0 −1.1
Team, games with logs · season totals31 games22531172413not published106373not published696–133352.2%153–55027.8%402–58968.3%49.2%52.6%31.3%
Sum of players22531069413247106359530Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0+1030not published0+14not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$635K
80% Range $280K to $1.40M
Tier
Mid and high major
low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$590K to $655K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
1 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Drew Steffe77.8%$105K$41K to $245K16.1%$95K to $105K$5KSufficient evidence
Quel'Ron House70.8%$105K$40K to $265K15.8%$98K to $110K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Damien Mayo Jr.62.0%$105K$42K to $260K15.7%$98K to $110K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rolyns Aligbe61.4%$47K$11K to $125K9.1%$44K to $48K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Prince Aligbe52.5%$25K$4K to $86K5.4%$23K to $26K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalen Haynes50.1%$65K$22K to $165K10.5%$61K to $67K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Davion Sykes46.2%$71K$28K to $175K10.7%$65K to $73K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Max Pikaar23.1%$13K$3K to $41K2.4%$12K to $13K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Stafford21.5%$20K$6K to $53K3.7%$19K to $21K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jorge Moreno21.3%$19K$7K to $50K3.7%$18K to $20K$5KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaheem Webber8.5%$13K$5K to $31K2.2%$12K to $14K$5KLimited evidence
Caden Hawkins4.9%$5K$2K to $12K0.8%$5K in all four$5KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$635K$280K to $1.40M100%$590K to $655K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$3,008,666Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$3,008,666
Athletics department expenses$27,439,369
Athletics department revenue$27,439,369

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 31 games, 2,188 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points2,2532,184
Field goals made849778
Field goals attempted1,8831,822
3-pointers made153230
3-pointers attempted550757
Free throws made402398
Free throws attempted589573
Offensive rebounds349309
Defensive rebounds823780
Total rebounds1,1721,089
Assists413405
Blocks106113
Turnovers373405
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 247.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 530.
Minutes (derived)6,275not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,2532,2530±11.30
Field goals madeReconciled8498490±4.20
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,8831,8830±9.40
3-pointers madeReconciled1531530±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled5505500±2.80
Free throws madeReconciled4024020±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5895890±2.90
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,1721,069+103±93.80
AssistsReconciled4134130±2.10
BlocksReconciled1061060±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown373359+14±11.20
StealsNo team figurenot published247not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published530not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,2756,260+14.9±125.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Drew Steffe77.8%+1.9range +0.9 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Quel'Ron House70.8%+2.1range +0.8 to +3.7Sufficient evidence
Damien Mayo Jr.62.0%+2.6range +1.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Rolyns Aligbe61.4%+0.4range -0.4 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Prince Aligbe52.5%-0.7range -2.0 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Jalen Haynes50.1%+1.6range +0.3 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Davion Sykes46.2%+2.2range +1.0 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Max Pikaar23.1%-1.0range -2.5 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Stafford21.5%+0.4range -0.5 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Jorge Moreno21.3%+0.4range -0.1 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Jaheem Webber8.5%+1.1range +0.5 to +1.7Limited evidence
Caden Hawkins4.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+10.6range +9.7 to +11.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.0% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 1.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.7%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value