Pacific

WCC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 138 · Raw net 2.3 · Tempo 65.8 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-08

Record: 16–15; 16 wins
AdjNet: 3.3β; rank 120 of 365
AdjO: 108.9β; rank 158 of 365
AdjD: 105.6β; rank 108 of 365
AdjT: 65.8β
SOS: 1.7β; rank 117 of 363
NCSOS: -0.0β
WAB: -6.7β; rank 144 of 363
RR: -1.0β
Exp. W: 17.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	108.0183	105.7101	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.2140	50.0101	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	20.1349	15.1274	16.7
Offensive rebound %	35.341	25.08	30.6
FTA / FGA %	30.5297	36.3219	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.864	34.7232	33.9
2P%	51.3200	48.552	51.7
FT%	75.567	70.472	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.3	42.8	39.5
Assists / FGM %	58.2	50.5	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	6.9	10.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	29.8	35.5	31.4
2-pointers %	52.1	44.2	48.8
Free throws %	18.1	20.4	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 7.6
Top Three Share of Minutes: 49%
Bench Share of Minutes: 26%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-08	Nevada	L 77–78	67.3	Away	0–1
11-12	Long Beach St.	W 69–66	68.6	Home	1–1
11-15	Cal St. Fullerton	W 85–73	78.3	Away	2–1
11-20	Fla. Atlantic	L 59–82	65.0	Away	2–2
11-24	Stony Brook	W 86–58	66.8	Neutral	3–2
11-25	Jacksonville	W 68–53	60.7	Neutral	4–2
11-29	Sacramento St.	W 68–54	70.8	Home	5–2
12-03	Air Force	W 80–65	60.9	Away	6–2
12-06	California	L 61–67	60.8	Away	6–3
12-16	BYU	L 57–93	71.6	Away	6–4
12-21	Nicholls	W 95–82	72.0	Home	7–4
12-28	San Diego	L 54–66	64.0	Away	7–5
12-30	LMU (CA)	L 71–80	69.6	Away	7–6
01-02	Oregon St.	W 84–53	62.3	Home	8–6
01-04	Pepperdine	W 74–69	66.7	Home	9–6
01-08	Portland	L 89–90 1OT	73.4	Away	9–7
01-10	San Diego	W 77–70	69.9	Home	10–7
01-14	Santa Clara	L 69–85	65.6	Away	10–8
01-17	Oregon St.	W 81–64	62.0	Away	11–8
01-24	Seattle U	W 56–54	62.7	Home	12–8
01-28	Portland	W 74–51	63.7	Home	13–8
01-31	San Francisco	L 82–87	67.7	Away	13–9
02-04	Santa Clara	L 56–71	64.1	Home	13–10
02-07	Pepperdine	W 92–59	72.5	Away	14–10
02-11	LMU (CA)	W 65–59	63.0	Home	15–10
02-14	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 61–72	63.4	Home	15–11
02-18	Washington St.	L 70–87	65.5	Away	15–12
02-21	Gonzaga	L 62–71	61.2	Away	15–13
02-28	San Francisco	L 61–72	64.5	Home	15–14
03-07	Seattle U	W 61–58	64.6	Neutral	16–14
03-08	Santa Clara	L 68–76	59.2	Neutral	16–15

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Elias Ralph	31	34:55	87.0%	19.1	7.6	2.1	1.0	1.1	2.4	2.5	130–261	49.8%	51–130	39.2%	104–121	86.0%	52.8%	58.2%	30.9%	5	34:40 −0:15	86.7%	17.4 +0.7
TJ Wainwright	31	32:02	79.8%	15.7	4.8	1.7	0.8	0.0	2.0	2.5	64–152	42.1%	65–167	38.9%	66–72	91.7%	50.6%	55.5%	22.6%	5	31:55 −0:07	79.8%	8.4 −4.1
Jaden Clayton	31	30:48	76.7%	10.3	4.5	8.3	1.5	0.0	3.2	2.4	55–128	43.0%	32–107	29.9%	40–54	74.1%	43.8%	47.5%	23.0%	5	32:08 +1:20	80.3%	9.0 +1.1
Justin Rochelin	31	27:41	68.9%	13.4	9.5	1.5	1.4	0.2	2.7	4.2	64–131	48.9%	32–82	39.0%	63–79	79.7%	52.6%	57.9%	37.1%	5	32:04 +4:23	80.2%	8.2 −1.1
Isaac Jack	31	22:07	55.1%	16.0	9.2	0.9	0.6	0.8	1.5	5.8	116–177	65.5%	0–0	—	43–72	59.7%	65.5%	65.9%	40.7%	5	18:15 −3:52	45.6%	7.6 −1.3
Kajus Kublickas	31	19:28	48.5%	11.3	5.0	5.5	0.8	0.1	3.8	4.4	34–81	42.0%	22–76	28.9%	37–51	72.5%	42.7%	47.6%	32.5%	5	17:40 −1:48	44.2%	5.0 −0.5
Jaion Pitt	31	16:47	41.8%	10.5	8.8	1.1	1.4	0.6	0.8	4.7	52–81	64.2%†	3–5	60.0%†	24–37	64.9%	65.7%†	67.0%†	43.0%†	5	18:39 +1:52	46.6%	4.2 −0.2
KC Ibekwe	30	9:04	21.9%	15.4	7.2	1.6	1.0	1.2	3.2	6.3	49–84	58.3%†	0–0	—	7–25	28.0%	58.3%†	55.3%†	29.8%†	4	11:26 +2:22	22.9%	4.0 +0.5
Alexis Marmolejos	23	8:55	16.5%	16.6	6.8	1.4	1.2	0.2	1.8	2.5	12–28	42.9%†	15–47	31.9%†	16–19	84.2%†	46.0%†	51.0%†	25.3%†	3	6:58 −1:57	10.4%	2.3 −1.4
Emmanuel ManyuonUnder 100 minutes	12	1:31	1.5%	0.0	6.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.2	4.4	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	2	1:13 −0:19	1.2%	0.0 0.0
Carlsheon YoungFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	2:56	0.2%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	27.3	40.9	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Eyal HarelFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	0:54	0.1%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	31 games			71.1	37.9	14.9	not published	2.2	13.2	not published	576–1123	51.3%	220–614	35.8%	400–530	75.5%	52.2%	56.1%	30.5%
Sum of players				71.1	34.4	14.8	5.4	2.2	12.1	18.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.5	+0.0	not published	0.0	+1.1	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $665K; 80% Range $290K to $1.45M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $655K to $700K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Elias Ralph	86.6%	$94K	$30K to $230K	15.9%	$92K to $98K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
TJ Wainwright	80.1%	$60K	$9K to $165K	11.2%	$58K to $62K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaden Clayton	76.2%	$170K	$70K to $445K	24.2%	$165K to $180K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Justin Rochelin	67.9%	$60K	$12K to $160K	11.0%	$59K to $63K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaac Jack	56.0%	$120K	$48K to $320K	16.9%	$120K to $130K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kajus Kublickas	49.4%	$25K	$4K to $83K	5.2%	$24K to $26K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaion Pitt	41.6%	$24K	$4K to $76K	4.6%	$24K to $25K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
KC Ibekwe	22.4%	$18K	$5K to $50K	3.4%	$18K to $19K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alexis Marmolejos	17.8%	$24K	$8K to $60K	3.8%	$23K to $25K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Emmanuel Manyuon	1.6%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Carlsheon Young	0.3%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Eyal Harel	0.1%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$665K	$290K to $1.45M	100%	$655K to $700K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of the Pacific (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$4,203,536	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$4,203,536
Athletics department expenses	$28,038,025
Athletics department revenue	$28,038,025

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 31 games, 2,049 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1245 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	71.1	69.6
Field goals made	25.6	23.6
Field goals attempted	55.8	55.4
3-pointers made	7.1	8.2
3-pointers attempted	19.7	23.7
Free throws made	12.9	14.2
Free throws attempted	17.0	20.1
Offensive rebounds	11.6	8.8
Defensive rebounds	26.4	21.2
Total rebounds	37.9	30.0
Assists	14.9	11.9
Blocks	2.2	3.8
Turnovers	13.2	10.0
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 168.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 567.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,212	2,212	0	±11.1	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	796	796	0	±4.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,737	1,737	0	±8.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	220	220	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	614	614	0	±3.1	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	400	400	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	530	530	0	±2.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,181	1,072	+109	±94.5	0
Assists	Reconciled	463	462	+1	±2.3	0
Blocks	Reconciled	68	68	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	411	378	+33	±12.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	168	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	567	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,225	6,198	+27.1	±124.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Elias Ralph	86.6%	+0.9range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
TJ Wainwright	80.1%	+0.2range -1.1 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Jaden Clayton	76.2%	+3.1range +2.1 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
Justin Rochelin	67.9%	+0.5range -0.9 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Isaac Jack	56.0%	+3.0range +1.8 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
Kajus Kublickas	49.4%	-0.8range -2.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Jaion Pitt	41.6%	-0.8range -2.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
KC Ibekwe	22.4%	-0.2range -1.3 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Alexis Marmolejos	17.8%	+0.9range -0.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Emmanuel Manyuon	1.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Carlsheon Young	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Eyal Harel	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.4range +9.5 to +11.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 99.6% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value