Seattle U

WCC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 130 · Raw net 2.7 · Tempo 68.8 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-22

Record: 19–14; 19 wins
AdjNet: 3.4β; rank 119 of 365
AdjO: 102.4β; rank 301 of 365
AdjD: 99.0β; rank 21 of 365
AdjT: 68.8β
SOS: 1.2β; rank 128 of 363
NCSOS: -4.0β
WAB: -5.4β; rank 113 of 363
RR: 0.4β
Exp. W: 18.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	101.5310	98.818	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	49.8248	48.449	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.8182	21.18	16.7
Offensive rebound %	23.7347	31.8249	30.6
FTA / FGA %	34.2201	33.0131	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.7187	32.171	33.9
2P%	49.3275	48.653	51.7
FT%	70.6251	74.2273	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	39.4	37.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	53.8	54.1	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	14.1	9.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	32.2	30.0	31.4
2-pointers %	48.3	49.8	48.8
Free throws %	19.5	20.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.3
Top Three Share of Minutes: 46%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Denver	W 84–73	77.0	Home	1–0
11-08	Cal Poly	L 71–73	76.1	Home	1–1
11-12	Eastern Wash.	W 94–67	73.6	Home	2–1
11-15	Idaho St.	W 83–74	62.4	Home	3–1
11-21	Stanford	W 77–69	72.6	Away	4–1
11-28	Texas St.	W 66–52	60.9	Neutral	5–1
11-29	UC Santa Barbara	L 71–74	62.7	Neutral	5–2
12-07	UTEP	W 75–68	66.3	Home	6–2
12-17	UC Davis	W 79–78	73.8	Away	7–2
12-19	Washington	W 70–66	76.4	Home	8–2
12-22	UTSA	W 71–68	74.0	Away	9–2
12-28	San Francisco	L 59–67	70.5	Home	9–3
12-30	Washington St.	W 69–55	68.4	Home	10–3
01-02	Gonzaga	L 72–80 1OT	75.8	Away	10–4
01-04	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 76–93	64.7	Away	10–5
01-08	Oregon St.	L 55–68	68.1	Away	10–6
01-15	San Diego	W 75–64	72.3	Home	11–6
01-17	Gonzaga	L 50–71	69.2	Home	11–7
01-21	LMU (CA)	W 69–59	68.8	Home	12–7
01-24	Pacific	L 54–56	62.7	Away	12–8
01-28	Washington St.	L 58–70	68.1	Away	12–9
02-04	Pepperdine	W 83–81	76.5	Home	13–9
02-07	Portland	L 53–54	62.5	Away	13–10
02-11	Santa Clara	L 72–84	68.4	Away	13–11
02-15	Oregon St.	W 60–50	64.1	Home	14–11
02-18	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 70–72	73.1	Home	14–12
02-21	Portland	W 71–59	68.6	Home	15–12
02-25	Pepperdine	W 87–80	70.1	Away	16–12
02-28	LMU (CA)	W 71–66	63.0	Away	17–12
03-06	San Diego	W 58–56	61.1	Neutral	18–12
03-07	Pacific	L 58–61	64.6	Neutral	18–13
03-17	St. Thomas (MN)	W 67–52	70.1	—	19–13
03-22	Auburn	L 85–91	72.7	—	19–14

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jun Seok Yeo	32	31:59	77.3%	393	132	51	18	12	68	61	88–149	59.1%	50–172	29.1%	67–96	69.8%	50.8%	54.1%	29.9%	4	34:35 +2:36	69.2%	12.3 0.0
Will Heimbrodt	32	31:55	77.1%	405	172	74	44	88	80	79	135–303	44.6%	18–63	28.6%	81–137	59.1%	44.3%	47.5%	37.4%	5	32:12 +0:17	80.5%	12.8 +0.1
Maleek Arington	33	30:52	76.9%	162	106	131	76	4	49	83	22–77	28.6%	17–52	32.7%	67–88	76.1%	36.8%	48.3%	68.2%	5	31:49 +0:58	79.6%	5.2 +0.3
Brayden Maldonado	30	31:39	71.7%	453	108	88	44	4	48	56	67–150	44.7%	77–206	37.4%	88–100	88.0%	51.3%	56.6%	28.1%	5	32:48 +1:09	82.0%	17.6 +2.5
Austin Maurer	33	18:10	45.3%	237	154	17	18	32	26	95	78–134	58.2%	10–37	27.0%†	51–71	71.8%	54.4%	58.6%	41.5%	5	16:51 −1:20	42.1%	3.6 −3.6
John Christofilis	33	16:25	40.9%	202	34	8	7	2	10	17	23–58	39.7%	46–115	40.0%	18–22	81.8%†	53.2%	55.3%	12.7%	5	18:25 +2:00	46.0%	7.8 +1.7
Houran Dan	33	15:05	37.6%	178	79	11	12	14	35	74	71–124	57.3%	0–0	—	36–58	62.1%	57.3%	59.5%	46.8%	5	14:23 −0:43	35.9%	3.6 −1.8
Jojo Murphy	33	14:49	36.9%	172	72	39	24	2	25	29	34–75	45.3%	25–77	32.5%	29–37	78.4%	47.0%	51.1%	24.3%	5	21:02 +6:13	52.6%	6.8 +1.6
Miles Amos	29	9:56	21.8%	47	45	13	13	0	20	33	11–24	45.8%†	5–12	41.7%†	10–21	47.6%†	51.4%†	51.9%†	58.3%†	2	7:25 −2:31	7.4%	0.5 −1.1
Brock Felder	26	6:28	12.7%	60	47	1	1	4	10	20	28–35	80.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	4–9	44.4%†	77.8%†	75.1%†	25.0%†	2	3:52 −2:37	3.9%	1.0 −1.3
Ray AdamsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	2:10	0.5%	0	0	1	1	0	0	3	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Stratos PapastavrouFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	1:40	0.3%	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	100.0%†	100.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Yuto KawashimaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	1:40	0.3%	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	1–2	50.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	33.3%†	33.3%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	33 games			2313	1031	434	not published	163	382	not published	559–1134	49.3%	248–736	33.7%	451–639	70.6%	49.8%	53.8%	34.2%
Sum of players				2313	950	434	258	162	371	550	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+81	0	not published	+1	+11	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $585K; 80% Range $260K to $1.30M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $575K to $625K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jun Seok Yeo	79.7%	$48K	$6K to $135K	10.3%	$46K to $50K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Will Heimbrodt	77.8%	$86K	$33K to $205K	15.2%	$85K to $92K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Maleek Arington	76.4%	$83K	$29K to $200K	15.0%	$82K to $89K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brayden Maldonado	71.3%	$105K	$41K to $260K	16.7%	$100K to $110K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Austin Maurer	46.4%	$96K	$38K to $265K	14.8%	$94K to $105K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
John Christofilis	39.9%	$41K	$13K to $110K	7.6%	$41K to $44K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Houran Dan	37.3%	$25K	$6K to $69K	5.2%	$24K to $26K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jojo Murphy	35.0%	$30K	$8K to $80K	6.1%	$30K to $32K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Miles Amos	21.9%	$10K	$3K to $34K	2.0%	$10K to $11K	$4K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brock Felder	13.1%	$11K	$3K to $29K	2.2%	$11K to $12K	$4K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ray Adams	0.6%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.8%	$4K to $5K	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Stratos Papastavrou	0.3%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.8%	$4K to $5K	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Yuto Kawashima	0.3%	$4K	$2K to $10K	0.8%	$4K to $5K	$4K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$585K	$260K to $1.30M	100%	$575K to $625K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Seattle University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,375,756	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,375,756
Athletics department expenses	$21,659,324
Athletics department revenue	$21,779,576

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 33 games, 2,279 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,313	2,251
Field goals made	807	786
Field goals attempted	1,870	1,855
3-pointers made	248	225
3-pointers attempted	736	700
Free throws made	451	454
Free throws attempted	639	612
Offensive rebounds	270	355
Defensive rebounds	761	870
Total rebounds	1,031	1,225
Assists	434	425
Blocks	163	109
Turnovers	382	482
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 258.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 550.
Minutes (derived)	6,625	not published

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jun Seok Yeo	79.7%	-0.0range -1.1 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Will Heimbrodt	77.8%	+1.3range +0.6 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Maleek Arington	76.4%	+1.3range +0.3 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
Brayden Maldonado	71.3%	+2.1range +1.0 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Austin Maurer	46.4%	+3.2range +2.3 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
John Christofilis	39.9%	+1.1range -0.1 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
Houran Dan	37.3%	-0.1range -0.9 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Jojo Murphy	35.0%	+0.5range -0.5 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Miles Amos	21.9%	-1.4range -2.6 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Brock Felder	13.1%	-0.2range -1.1 to +0.6Limited evidence
Ray Adams	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Yuto Kawashima	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Stratos Papastavrou	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.5range +9.7 to +11.2Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.8% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.6%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value