Colorado

B12 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 171 · Raw net 0.6 · Tempo 70.2 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-04-01

Record: 17–16; 17 wins
AdjNet: 6.6β; rank 88 of 365
AdjO: 114.7β; rank 62 of 365
AdjD: 108.1β; rank 176 of 365
AdjT: 69.6β
SOS: 7.1β; rank 53 of 363
NCSOS: -2.2β
WAB: -3.8β; rank 88 of 363
RR: 1.1β
Exp. W: 15.9β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	112.983	112.4275	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.9108	52.6243	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	14.646	15.3267	16.7
Offensive rebound %	29.0235	29.6144	30.6
FTA / FGA %	36.7139	36.6228	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.2104	36.3318	33.9
2P%	53.0128	51.5162	51.7
FT%	76.151	74.3286	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.2	36.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	55.3	51.1	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.8	9.2	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	27.8	30.0	31.4
2-pointers %	51.3	49.5	48.8
Free throws %	20.9	20.6	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 43%
Bench Share of Minutes: 36%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Montana St.	W 84–78	68.8	Home	1–0
11-08	Eastern Wash.	W 102–97 1OT	78.3	Home	2–0
11-14	Providence	W 97–88	79.3	Home	3–0
11-17	Alabama St.	W 94–66	70.9	Home	4–0
11-21	UC Davis	W 95–79	69.6	Home	5–0
11-27	San Francisco	W 79–69	68.5	Neutral	6–0
11-28	Washington	W 81–68	68.7	Neutral	7–0
12-01	California Baptist	W 78–70	68.1	Home	8–0
12-06	Colorado St.	L 86–91	67.1	Away	8–1
12-13	UTSA	W 88–64	72.3	Home	9–1
12-17	Portland St.	W 84–73	71.4	Home	10–1
12-20	Stanford	L 68–77	70.3	Neutral	10–2
12-28	Northern Colo.	L 81–86	73.1	Home	10–3
01-03	Arizona St.	W 95–89	80.4	Away	11–3
01-07	Utah	W 85–73	69.9	Home	12–3
01-10	Texas Tech	L 71–73	68.1	Home	12–4
01-14	Cincinnati	L 68–77	72.9	Away	12–5
01-17	West Virginia	L 61–72	59.0	Away	12–6
01-20	Kansas	L 69–75	67.5	Home	12–7
01-24	UCF	L 86–95	70.2	Home	12–8
01-29	Iowa St.	L 67–97	68.2	Away	12–9
02-01	TCU	W 87–61	66.1	Home	13–9
02-04	Baylor	L 67–86	67.9	Away	13–10
02-07	Arizona St.	W 78–70	65.6	Home	14–10
02-11	Texas Tech	L 44–78	63.7	Away	14–11
02-14	BYU	L 86–90 1OT	82.2	Away	14–12
02-21	Oklahoma St.	W 83–69	72.2	Home	15–12
02-25	Kansas St.	W 79–70	80.4	Home	16–12
02-28	Houston	L 62–102	69.1	Away	16–13
03-03	Utah	W 92–78	63.9	Away	17–13
03-07	Arizona	L 79–89	72.7	Home	17–14
03-10	Oklahoma St.	L 83–92	73.1	Neutral	17–15
04-01	Oklahoma	L 86–90 1OT	82.9	—	17–16

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Barrington Hargress	33	32:32	80.4%	18.1	2.7	5.5	1.2	0.1	1.5	2.8	124–223	55.6%	52–108	48.1%	81–97	83.5%	61.0%	64.9%	29.3%	5	36:07 +3:36	88.1%	17.4 +2.7
Isaiah Johnson	32	30:27	73.0%	22.2	3.8	3.9	1.4	0.0	1.9	2.0	106–185	57.3%	56–148	37.8%	160–195	82.1%	57.1%	64.5%	58.6%	4	35:36 +5:09	69.5%	20.8 +3.9
Bangot Dak	32	25:54	62.1%	17.8	10.1	2.2	1.1	2.4	2.0	2.9	131–241	54.4%	14–54	25.9%	64–87	73.6%	51.5%	55.2%	29.5%	4	28:18 +2:24	55.2%	16.8 +5.3
Sebastian Rancik	29	28:02	60.9%	17.5	7.9	2.8	1.3	0.7	2.5	3.1	64–137	46.7%	39–118	33.1%	111–129	86.0%	48.0%	57.1%	50.6%	1	21:05 −6:57	10.3%	11.0 −1.3
Josiah Sanders	33	17:43	43.8%	10.0	6.0	3.8	0.8	0.0	1.8	2.5	55–101	54.5%	3–24	12.5%†	27–52	51.9%	47.6%	49.4%	41.6%	5	25:30 +7:46	62.2%	5.4 +1.0
Alon Michaeli	31	17:31	40.7%	16.1	9.0	2.4	1.2	0.5	2.4	3.5	63–140	45.0%	18–62	29.0%	39–54	72.2%	44.6%	48.5%	26.7%	5	15:47 −1:43	38.5%	5.2 −1.9
Jalin Holland	31	16:59	39.4%	11.6	6.3	1.9	1.8	0.9	2.4	5.5	41–90	45.6%	15–54	27.8%	26–48	54.2%	44.1%	46.3%	33.3%	5	22:37 +5:39	55.2%	7.8 +2.9
Felix Kossaras	28	16:21	34.3%	11.2	3.6	1.0	1.2	0.5	1.2	4.0	25–38	65.8%†	19–50	38.0%	21–28	75.0%	60.8%†	63.8%†	31.8%†	3	9:30 −6:50	13.9%	5.3 +0.8
Elijah Malone	30	14:00	31.5%	12.3	8.6	2.1	1.2	1.0	2.2	6.5	50–93	53.8%	4–14	28.6%†	17–22	77.3%†	52.3%	55.3%	20.6%	4	17:27 +3:27	34.1%	5.3 +1.0
Ian Inman	22	10:17	16.9%	16.1	4.1	1.4	1.1	0.0	1.4	3.5	10–18	55.6%†	22–60	36.7%	5–8	62.5%†	55.1%†	55.8%†	10.3%†	5	19:27 +9:10	47.4%	5.0 +0.9
Fawaz "Tacko" Ifaola	20	7:41	11.5%	3.6	10.7	1.6	2.1	1.3	2.1	9.4	7–9	77.8%†	0–0	—	0–3	0.0%†	77.8%†	67.8%†	33.3%†	4	6:35 −1:06	12.8%	0.0 −0.7
Andrew CrawfordUnder 100 minutes	10	4:26	3.3%	12.6	5.4	2.7	2.7	0.9	2.7	6.3	2–5	40.0%†	3–5	60.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	65.0%†	64.3%†	20.0%†	3	7:12 +2:46	10.5%	0.0 −1.4
Nick RandallFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	0:54	0.1%	44.8	22.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	100.0%†	100.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	33 games			79.3	34.2	15.3	not published	3.3	10.2	not published	679–1281	53.0%	245–697	35.2%	552–725	76.1%	52.9%	57.6%	36.7%
Sum of players				79.3	30.8	15.3	6.3	3.3	9.7	17.5	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.4	+0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.55M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Barrington Hargress	80.9%	$590K	$320K to $990K	16.4%	$590K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Johnson	72.7%	$590K	$335K to $1.10M	16.0%	$590K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Bangot Dak	62.7%	$555K	$310K to $1.05M	15.0%	$555K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Sebastian Rancik	61.1%	$425K	$180K to $735K	12.0%	$425K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Josiah Sanders	43.4%	$175K	$27K to $325K	5.2%	$175K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alon Michaeli	40.2%	$180K	$29K to $335K	5.5%	$180K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalin Holland	39.8%	$230K	$51K to $395K	6.9%	$230K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Felix Kossaras	34.8%	$170K	$30K to $310K	5.2%	$170K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Elijah Malone	32.4%	$250K	$130K to $430K	7.1%	$250K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Ian Inman	17.1%	$92K	$29K to $160K	2.8%	$92K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Fawaz "Tacko" Ifaola	11.1%	$88K	$46K to $140K	2.6%	$88K in all four	$26K	Limited evidence
Andrew Crawford	3.4%	$26K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$26K in all four	$26K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Nick Randall	0.1%	$26K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$26K in all four	$26K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.55M to $4.95M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Colorado Boulder (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$11,918,793
Men's basketball expenses	$8,608,358
Athletics department expenses	$161,512,069
Athletics department revenue	$161,671,803

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 33 games, 2,343 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1335 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	79.3	78.9
Field goals made	27.7	27.4
Field goals attempted	59.3	59.6
3-pointers made	7.3	7.9
3-pointers attempted	20.9	21.7
Free throws made	16.5	16.2
Free throws attempted	21.7	21.8
Offensive rebounds	9.9	10.2
Defensive rebounds	24.3	24.2
Total rebounds	34.2	34.4
Assists	15.3	14.0
Blocks	3.3	3.5
Turnovers	10.2	10.7
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 209.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 583.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,645	2,645	0	±13.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	924	924	0	±4.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,978	1,978	0	±9.9	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	245	245	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	697	697	0	±3.5	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	552	552	0	±2.8	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	725	725	0	±3.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,142	1,028	+114	±91.4	0
Assists	Reconciled	511	510	+1	±2.6	0
Blocks	Reconciled	111	110	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	342	325	+17	±10.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	209	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	583	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,675	6,648	+27.5	±133.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Barrington Hargress	80.9%	+1.5range +0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Johnson	72.7%	+1.7range +0.5 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Bangot Dak	62.7%	+2.1range +0.4 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Sebastian Rancik	61.1%	+1.3range -0.2 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Josiah Sanders	43.4%	-0.6range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Alon Michaeli	40.2%	-0.2range -1.7 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Jalin Holland	39.8%	+0.7range -0.7 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Felix Kossaras	34.8%	-0.0range -1.6 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Elijah Malone	32.4%	+1.4range +0.3 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Ian Inman	17.1%	-0.1range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Fawaz "Tacko" Ifaola	11.1%	+0.8range -0.1 to +1.5Limited evidence
Andrew Crawford	3.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Nick Randall	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.4range +9.6 to +11.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.3% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.2%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value