Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Montana

BSky · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 222 · Raw net -2.6 · Tempo 71.1 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-11

All seasons
Record
15–15
15 wins
AdjNet
-2.1β
rank 208 of 365
AdjO
106.1β
rank 222 of 365
AdjD
108.2β
rank 179 of 365
AdjT
70.2β
SOS
0.1β
rank 157 of 363
NCSOS
4.5β
WAB
-8.3β
rank 186 of 363
RR
1.3β
Exp. W
13.7β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.106.5215109.2199108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%55.82350.512851.4
TO / 100 poss.19.634014.332716.7
Offensive rebound %20.736329.614330.6
FTA / FGA %36.813532.612035.0
Shooting
3P%36.63832.37633.9
2P%56.53551.918551.7
FT%77.32772.217172.5
Style
3PA / FGA %41.838.039.5
Assists / FGM %55.148.452.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %6.48.79.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %32.829.531.4
2-pointers %46.951.648.8
Free throws %20.318.919.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.4
Top Three Share of Minutes
45%
Bench Share of Minutes
32%
Players with Logged Minutes
13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-08StanfordL 68–9174.6Away0–1
11-11UNLVW 102–9380.8Away1–1
11-14Cal PolyW 90–8280.9Home2–1
11-18Texas A&ML 81–8670.0Away2–2
11-23Lamar UniversityL 63–6872.5Home2–3
11-25OaklandL 87–9577.6Home2–4
12-03North Dakota St.L 72–8169.8Home2–5
12-06North DakotaW 79–7569.0Away3–5
12-20LouisvilleL 54–9474.6Away3–6
01-01Northern Ariz.W 78–6465.4Home4–6
01-03Northern Colo.W 88–7976.5Home5–6
01-08IdahoW 79–7370.1Away6–6
01-10Eastern Wash.L 65–6663.4Away6–7
01-17Montana St.L 67–7671.1Away6–8
01-19Northern Ariz.W 98–7261.6Away7–8
01-22Weber St.W 81–6564.6Home8–8
01-24Idaho St.W 69–6067.2Home9–8
01-29Portland St.W 64–6068.6Away10–8
01-31Sacramento St.L 79–8672.2Away10–9
02-05Eastern Wash.L 74–8270.7Home10–10
02-07IdahoW 73–6872.1Home11–10
02-14Montana St.L 71–8266.0Home11–11
02-19Idaho St.L 69–7367.8Away11–12
02-21Weber St.L 72–9267.5Away11–13
02-26Sacramento St.W 81–7372.0Home12–13
02-28Portland St.W 74–6871.5Home13–13
03-02Northern Colo.L 57–8573.3Away13–14
03-09Northern Colo.W 95–8974.6Neutral14–14
03-10Portland St.W 75–7273.6Neutral15–14
03-11IdahoL 66–7772.1Neutral15–15

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groupsMinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Money Williams3031:5679.8%27.15.35.71.20.45.33.7158–28555.4%49–13835.5%186–21586.5%54.7%62.7%50.8%532:12 +0:1780.5%27.0 +5.4
Tyler Thompson3030:0975.4%11.15.21.81.10.51.72.019–3751.4%63–15839.9%25–3180.6%58.2%60.4%15.9%531:04 +0:5577.7%6.2 −2.2
Te'Jon Sawyer3028:1970.8%15.67.31.80.80.72.63.9103–15367.3%31–8735.6%33–4671.7%62.3%63.8%19.2%530:32 +2:1476.3%9.4 −1.7
Kenyon Aguino3023:4559.4%14.46.82.50.80.71.93.688–14560.7%9–3030.0%†54–7572.0%58.0%61.8%42.9%522:54 −0:5157.3%6.2 −2.4
Tyler Isaak3022:0455.2%10.24.83.61.10.21.83.626–5349.1%24–7233.3%45–5384.9%49.6%57.0%42.4%521:36 −0:2754.0%5.2 −0.4
Brooklyn Hicks3021:5054.6%15.86.41.41.40.21.82.657–10554.3%36–9637.5%37–5468.5%55.2%57.6%26.9%525:47 +3:5764.4%8.4 −0.2
Grant Kepley2522:1846.5%11.84.85.01.10.13.54.736–7945.6%15–4632.6%†47–6968.1%46.8%52.8%55.2%519:32 −2:4648.8%6.8 +0.2
Trae Taylor268:2618.3%9.16.60.40.91.11.64.921–3363.6%†0–0—8–1650.0%†63.6%†62.4%†48.5%†510:37 +2:1126.5%2.0 +0.1
Connor Dick227:2113.5%7.45.71.22.21.52.05.97–1643.8%†1–1010.0%†13–1968.4%†32.7%†43.7%†73.1%†33:58 −3:235.9%0.7 −0.7
Amari JedkinsUnder 100 minutes204:598.3%7.26.80.42.41.20.85.66–1250.0%†1–714.3%†3–560.0%†39.5%†42.5%†26.3%†21:53 −3:051.9%0.0 −0.9
Chase HendersonUnder 100 minutes165:487.7%13.44.33.90.40.03.45.26–1540.0%†4–1040.0%†7–977.8%†48.0%†53.5%†36.0%†24:59 −0:505.0%4.5 +2.6
Courtney AndersonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes810:076.7%22.24.00.50.00.53.02.03–475.0%†12–2060.0%†3–475.0%†87.5%†87.3%†16.7%†————
Kadyn BettsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes65:392.8%17.74.70.00.01.28.33.53–650.0%†3–475.0%†0–0—75.0%†75.0%†0.0%†————
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes30 games75.732.514.3not published2.513.9not published533–94356.5%248–67836.6%461–59677.3%55.8%60.3%36.8%
Sum of players75.729.114.35.42.413.517.8Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.40.0not published+0.1+0.4not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$270K
80% Range $100K to $715K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$265K to $285K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
13
2 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Money Williams80.5%$21K$2K to $81K10.9%$20K to $22K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyler Thompson75.7%$75K$24K to $230K25.8%$74K to $80K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Te'Jon Sawyer71.7%$28K$5K to $90K12.7%$27K to $30K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kenyon Aguino60.3%$52K$16K to $160K17.7%$50K to $54K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyler Isaak55.4%$11K$1K to $49K5.5%$10K to $11K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brooklyn Hicks54.3%$14K$2K to $55K7.3%$14K to $15K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Grant Kepley45.4%$12K$2K to $46K6.0%$12K to $13K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Trae Taylor17.8%$11K$3K to $33K4.2%$11K in all four$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Connor Dick13.5%$4K$1K to $13K1.5%$4K in all four$2KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amari Jedkins8.2%$3K$1K to $10K1.2%$3K in all four$2KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chase Henderson7.8%$4K$1K to $12K1.6%$4K in all four$2KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Courtney Anderson6.9%$2K$1K to $6K0.8%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Kadyn Betts2.6%$2K$1K to $6K0.8%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$270K$100K to $715K100%$265K to $285K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, The University of Montana (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$3,042,961
Men's basketball expenses$3,498,484
Athletics department expenses$30,414,535
Athletics department revenue$30,414,535

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 30 games, 2,132 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1200 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points75.777.6
Field goals made26.027.6
Field goals attempted54.062.2
3-pointers made8.37.6
3-pointers attempted22.623.7
Free throws made15.414.7
Free throws attempted19.920.3
Offensive rebounds6.211.1
Defensive rebounds26.323.9
Total rebounds32.535.0
Assists14.313.4
Blocks2.52.7
Turnovers13.910.2
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 163.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 533.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,2712,2710±11.40
Field goals madeReconciled7817810±3.90
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,6211,6210±8.10
3-pointers madeReconciled2482480±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6786780±3.40
Free throws madeReconciled4614610±2.30
Free throws attemptedReconciled5965960±3.00
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown976873+103±78.10
AssistsReconciled4304300±2.10
BlocksReconciled7472+2±2.00
TurnoversReconciled417405+12±12.50
StealsNo team figurenot published163not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published533not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,0005,987+13.3±120.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Money Williams80.5%-0.3range -1.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Tyler Thompson75.7%+2.7range +1.6 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
Te'Jon Sawyer71.7%+0.4range -0.7 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Kenyon Aguino60.3%+2.3range +0.8 to +4.1Sufficient evidence
Tyler Isaak55.4%-1.2range -2.9 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Brooklyn Hicks54.3%-0.4range -1.9 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Grant Kepley45.4%-0.7range -2.4 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Trae Taylor17.8%+0.9range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Connor Dick13.5%-2.0range -3.2 to -0.6Limited evidence
Amari Jedkins8.2%-1.5range -2.3 to -0.7Limited evidence
Chase Henderson7.8%-0.7range -1.4 to +0.2Limited evidence
Courtney Anderson6.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Kadyn Betts2.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+9.7range +8.9 to +10.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.1% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.9%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 5.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value