Stonehill

NEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 286 · Raw net -7.9 · Tempo 66.6 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 10–21; 10 wins
AdjNet: -11.8β; rank 318 of 365
AdjO: 95.2β; rank 359 of 365
AdjD: 107.0β; rank 147 of 365
AdjT: 67.4β
SOS: -6.0β; rank 342 of 363
NCSOS: 0.2β
WAB: -16.3β; rank 332 of 363
RR: -2.2β
Exp. W: 12.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	94.9356	102.855	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	46.9339	47.836	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.4335	13.4347	16.7
Offensive rebound %	27.5282	27.139	30.6
FTA / FGA %	27.3350	30.371	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.7294	33.4152	33.9
2P%	46.5343	46.721	51.7
FT%	68.5311	68.06	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	40.5	32.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	51.3	44.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.9	13.8	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	34.2	28.0	31.4
2-pointers %	49.1	54.3	48.8
Free throws %	16.6	17.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 16

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	DePaul	L 64–72	75.9	Away	0–1
11-11	Rhode Island	L 57–80	71.2	Away	0–2
11-14	Fairfield	L 71–73 1OT	77.3	Away	0–3
11-15	Loyola Maryland	L 63–74	65.8	Neutral	0–4
11-17	Iowa St.	L 57–96	70.6	Away	0–5
11-21	Lafayette	W 74–70	71.4	Home	1–5
11-26	UMass Lowell	L 64–75	68.6	Home	1–6
11-30	Quinnipiac	L 62–76	69.3	Away	1–7
12-02	Bryant	L 65–77	61.7	Away	1–8
12-17	New Hampshire	L 58–59	68.3	Away	1–9
12-22	Syracuse	L 48–77	61.9	Away	1–10
01-02	New Haven	L 55–70	66.0	Home	1–11
01-04	Wagner	W 69–60	61.1	Away	2–11
01-08	Central Conn. St.	L 69–76	66.3	Away	2–12
01-10	Chicago St.	W 85–82 1OT	73.5	Home	3–12
01-17	Mercyhurst	W 62–57 1OT	69.8	Away	4–12
01-19	Saint Francis	L 61–63	67.6	Away	4–13
01-23	LIU	L 63–66	64.9	Home	4–14
01-26	Central Conn. St.	W 61–59	65.7	Home	5–14
01-29	FDU	W 58–57	60.1	Home	6–14
01-31	Le Moyne	W 65–54	71.4	Away	7–14
02-05	FDU	L 58–74	63.7	Away	7–15
02-07	LIU	L 54–61	61.2	Away	7–16
02-12	Chicago St.	L 55–68	56.0	Away	7–17
02-14	Wagner	L 57–68	65.9	Home	7–18
02-19	New Haven	L 51–64	65.5	Away	7–19
02-21	Le Moyne	W 77–68	70.4	Home	8–19
02-26	Saint Francis	W 103–77	73.0	Home	9–19
02-28	Mercyhurst	L 72–75 1OT	76.6	Home	9–20
03-04	Le Moyne	W 81–71	70.5	Away	10–20
03-07	Mercyhurst	L 51–56	65.6	Away	10–21

Roster · 16 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Hermann Koffi	30	35:52	85.4%	378	87	41	14	1	37	47	60–135	44.4%	71–197	36.0%	45–51	88.2%	50.2%	53.3%	15.4%	4	34:47 −1:06	67.9%	10.5 −2.1
Davante Hackett	31	27:47	68.4%	430	127	43	26	14	43	71	84–169	49.7%	61–177	34.5%	79–108	73.1%	50.7%	54.6%	31.2%	5	34:56 +7:08	85.2%	26.4 +12.5
Chas Stinson	30	28:38	68.2%	340	162	48	29	31	63	85	115–238	48.3%	8–34	23.5%†	86–122	70.5%	46.7%	52.2%	44.9%	5	31:37 +3:00	77.1%	13.8 +2.5
Rex Sunderland	31	27:26	67.5%	148	110	99	37	13	76	87	31–86	36.0%	22–81	27.2%	20–33	60.6%	38.3%	40.8%	19.8%	5	32:28 +5:02	79.2%	2.6 −2.2
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	31	24:04	59.2%	186	154	41	6	27	48	59	49–114	43.0%	20–73	27.4%	28–42	66.7%	42.2%	45.3%	22.5%	5	8:37 −15:27	21.0%	1.8 −4.2
Ridvan Tutic	28	23:23	51.9%	193	214	27	6	17	37	52	83–142	58.5%	0–0	—	27–50	54.0%	58.5%	58.8%	35.2%	5	21:04 −2:18	51.4%	8.6 +1.7
Ethan Meuser	20	20:28	32.5%	122	104	25	11	14	23	42	26–51	51.0%	17–60	28.3%	19–35	54.3%	46.4%	48.3%	31.5%	5	22:45 +2:17	55.5%	8.8 +2.7
Trenton Ruth	30	10:37	25.3%	91	27	28	8	1	22	28	21–62	33.9%	12–45	26.7%†	13–21	61.9%†	36.4%	39.1%	19.6%	5	9:37 −1:00	23.5%	2.2 −0.8
Pearse McGuinn	23	8:53	16.2%	44	31	6	0	4	15	13	12–31	38.7%†	4–15	26.7%†	8–11	72.7%†	39.1%†	43.3%†	23.9%†	2	2:27 −6:26	2.4%	2.0 +0.1
Anthony Holden	18	9:29	13.6%	36	14	5	3	2	3	4	4–10	40.0%†	9–19	47.4%†	1–2	50.0%†	60.3%†	60.2%†	6.9%†	5	13:22 +3:53	32.6%	3.4 +1.4
Will BatchelderFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	31:45	5.0%	16	5	3	3	0	6	4	2–9	22.2%†	3–11	27.3%†	3–3	100.0%†	32.5%†	37.5%†	15.0%†	—	—	—	—
Cory LovellFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	4:44	3.4%	2	3	0	2	0	0	5	1–4	25.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	20.0%†	20.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Eino MontinFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	4:08	0.7%	2	1	0	0	0	1	0	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	100.0%†	53.2%†	200.0%†	—	—	—	—
Charlie DiamantisFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	1:53	0.4%	2	3	1	0	0	1	0	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	2–3	66.7%†	0.0%†	30.1%†	150.0%†	1	2:04 +0:11	1.0%	0.0 −0.7
Norbu JenpaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:23	0.4%	0	1	0	0	0	2	1	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	2:04 +0:42	1.0%	0.0 0.0
Colin ByrneFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	2:04	0.2%	0	2	0	0	0	0	1	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	1	2:04 0:00	1.0%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · season totals	31 games			1990	1136	367	not published	124	407	not published	489–1052	46.5%	227–716	31.7%	331–483	68.5%	46.9%	50.2%	27.3%
Sum of players				1990	1045	367	145	124	377	499	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+91	0	not published	0	+30	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

1 rostered player has no figure: no recorded possessions or no matched player record.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Stonehill College (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,912,027	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$1,912,027
Athletics department expenses	$20,977,828
Athletics department revenue	$20,977,828

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 31 games, 2,097 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	1,990	2,155
Field goals made	716	786
Field goals attempted	1,768	1,855
3-pointers made	227	201
3-pointers attempted	716	601
Free throws made	331	382
Free throws attempted	483	562
Offensive rebounds	303	310
Defensive rebounds	833	800
Total rebounds	1,136	1,110
Assists	367	346
Blocks	124	145
Turnovers	407	280
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 145.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 499.
Minutes (derived)	6,300	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,990	1,990	0	±10.0	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	716	716	0	±3.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,768	1,768	0	±8.8	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	227	227	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	716	716	0	±3.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	331	331	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	483	483	0	±2.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,136	1,045	+91	±90.9	0
Assists	Reconciled	367	367	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	124	124	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	407	377	+30	±12.2	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	145	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	499	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,300	6,278	+21.9	±126.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Hermann Koffi	86.1%	-1.6range -2.5 to -0.2Sufficient evidence
Rex Sunderland	69.2%	-0.6range -1.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Chas Stinson	67.3%	-0.6range -1.4 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Davante Hackett	65.6%	-0.2range -1.2 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	59.3%	-1.5range -2.6 to -0.2Sufficient evidence
Ridvan Tutic	54.9%	+1.2range -0.2 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Ethan Meuser	33.8%	+0.4range -0.4 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Trenton Ruth	22.7%	-1.5range -2.8 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
Pearse McGuinn	16.6%	-2.9range -4.1 to -1.9Limited evidence
Anthony Holden	12.5%	-1.5range -2.3 to -0.5Limited evidence
Will Batchelder	6.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cory Lovell	3.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Eino Montin	0.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Charlie Diamantis	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Norbu Jenpa	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.6range +7.8 to +9.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 97.6% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 5.8%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value