LIU Brooklyn

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for LIU Brooklyn, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Greg Gordon	84.2%	+0.6range -0.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence	+6.4range +5.6 to +7.0Sufficient evidence	$36KspeculativeLoading	$9K to $110KLoading
Jamal Fuller	84.2%	+2.8range +1.8 to +3.9Sufficient evidence	+7.9range +7.0 to +8.6Sufficient evidence	$90KspeculativeLoading	$29K to $285KLoading
Malachi Davis	77.2%	+0.5range -0.5 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	+5.8range +5.0 to +6.6Sufficient evidence	$34KspeculativeLoading	$7K to $105KLoading
Jomo Goings	75.5%	+0.4range -0.5 to +1.2Sufficient evidence	+5.6range +4.8 to +6.2Sufficient evidence	$30KspeculativeLoading	$6K to $95KLoading
Shadrak Lasu	56.6%	+0.2range -0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidence	+4.1range +3.4 to +4.7Sufficient evidence	$22KspeculativeLoading	$4K to $74KLoading
Mason Porter-Brown	47.0%	+1.2range +0.2 to +2.5Sufficient evidence	+3.8range +3.3 to +4.2Sufficient evidence	$30KspeculativeLoading	$9K to $94KLoading
Faheim Meran	19.0%	+0.8range -0.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	$11KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $37KLoading
Tre'shawn Sheppard	18.9%	+0.7range -0.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	$11KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $33KLoading
Caleb Johnson	16.9%	+1.3range +0.5 to +2.2Sufficient evidence	+1.3range +1.2 to +1.4Sufficient evidence	$12KspeculativeLoading	$4K to $37KLoading
A.J. Neal	8.1%	-1.1range -1.7 to -0.4Limited evidence	+0.5range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidence	$4KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $11KLoading
Isaiah Miranda	6.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $7KLoading
Max Ndlovu-Fraser	3.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $7KLoading
Xinyi Li	2.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $7KLoading
Eddie Munyak	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $7KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $315K; 80% Range $115K to $880K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $285K to $330K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Greg Gordon	84.2%	$36K	$9K to $110K	14.0%	$33K to $38K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jamal Fuller	84.2%	$90K	$29K to $285K	25.8%	$81K to $94K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Malachi Davis	77.2%	$34K	$7K to $105K	12.9%	$31K to $35K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jomo Goings	75.5%	$30K	$6K to $95K	12.0%	$27K to $32K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Shadrak Lasu	56.6%	$22K	$4K to $74K	8.9%	$20K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mason Porter-Brown	47.0%	$30K	$9K to $94K	10.0%	$27K to $32K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Faheim Meran	19.0%	$11K	$3K to $37K	4.0%	$10K to $12K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tre'shawn Sheppard	18.9%	$11K	$3K to $33K	3.9%	$10K to $11K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Caleb Johnson	16.9%	$12K	$4K to $37K	4.0%	$11K to $13K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
A.J. Neal	8.1%	$4K	$1K to $11K	1.3%	$3K to $4K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Miranda	6.6%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Max Ndlovu-Fraser	3.4%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Xinyi Li	2.0%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Eddie Munyak	0.2%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$315K	$115K to $880K	100%	$285K to $330K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Long Island University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,545,194	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,545,194
Athletics department expenses	$45,931,608
Athletics department revenue	$45,931,608

Coverage and exclusions

31 of 35 games passed lineup acceptance (89%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

4 of 35 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$3,545,194	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$3,545,194	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
2 days	11
3 or more days	23

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	1
Longest run of consecutive away games	3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology