Navy

Pat · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 34 · Raw net 12.8 · Tempo 65.2 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-18

Record: 24–8; 24 wins
AdjNet: 4.0β; rank 111 of 365
AdjO: 108.2β; rank 177 of 365
AdjD: 104.2β; rank 78 of 365
AdjT: 66.3β
SOS: -8.3β; rank 360 of 363
NCSOS: -7.3β
WAB: -3.7β; rank 84 of 363
RR: -0.4β
Exp. W: 24.4β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	112.397	99.523	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	53.1100	48.342	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.8188	18.381	16.7
Offensive rebound %	31.9126	27.450	30.6
FTA / FGA %	38.880	26.013	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.863	30.07	33.9
2P%	52.7140	51.0145	51.7
FT%	73.6146	75.3327	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	33.1	46.0	39.5
Assists / FGM %	61.2	52.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	10.7	7.9	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	26.5	35.7	31.4
2-pointers %	52.3	47.4	48.8
Free throws %	21.2	16.9	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 7.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 51%
Bench Share of Minutes: 24%
Players with Logged Minutes: 16

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Presbyterian	W 76–55	64.4	Away	1–0
11-07	Yale	L 68–97	75.6	Home	1–1
11-11	Penn St.	L 71–80	68.6	Away	1–2
11-18	North Carolina	L 61–73	70.0	Away	1–3
11-22	NJIT	W 86–70	68.8	Home	2–3
11-26	Gardner-Webb	W 84–51	66.6	Neutral	3–3
11-28	UNCW	L 57–87	65.2	Away	3–4
11-29	Southeastern La.	L 65–69	64.7	Neutral	3–5
12-03	Delaware St.	W 66–59	71.1	Away	4–5
12-07	Air Force	W 61–56	63.4	Home	5–5
12-19	Coppin St.	W 88–55	67.0	Home	6–5
12-31	Boston U.	W 82–77	67.5	Home	7–5
01-03	Holy Cross	W 65–58	61.1	Away	8–5
01-07	Bucknell	W 76–55	65.6	Home	9–5
01-10	Lafayette	W 76–50	67.0	Home	10–5
01-12	American	L 51–65	62.3	Away	10–6
01-17	Lehigh	W 82–79 2OT	77.0	Away	11–6
01-21	Holy Cross	W 85–68	65.3	Home	12–6
01-24	Army West Point	W 84–56	63.1	Home	13–6
01-28	Boston U.	W 58–50	56.1	Away	14–6
01-31	Loyola Maryland	W 87–71	65.3	Home	15–6
02-04	Lafayette	W 65–50	63.5	Away	16–6
02-07	American	W 82–73	64.5	Home	17–6
02-09	Bucknell	W 76–60	69.2	Away	18–6
02-14	Colgate	W 84–80 1OT	71.6	Away	19–6
02-18	Lehigh	W 72–49	64.5	Home	20–6
02-21	Army West Point	W 81–63	64.0	Away	21–6
02-25	Loyola Maryland	W 78–51	60.9	Away	22–6
02-28	Colgate	W 85–69	66.5	Home	23–6
03-05	Bucknell	W 74–69	62.7	Home	24–6
03-08	Boston U.	L 72–73	61.3	Home	24–7
03-18	Wake Forest	L 72–82	66.1	—	24–8

Roster · 16 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Austin Benigni	32	36:50	91.0%	20.1	3.7	4.9	1.4	0.3	3.1	2.3	126–303	41.6%	57–132	43.2%	170–193	88.1%	48.6%	57.0%	44.4%	5	38:35 +1:45	96.4%	17.4 −1.1
Aidan Kehoe	32	34:16	84.7%	17.8	12.8	2.8	1.5	1.5	2.1	1.8	207–284	72.9%	0–0	—	74–157	47.1%	72.9%	69.1%	55.3%	5	34:26 +0:10	86.1%	13.6 −1.7
Jinwoo Kim	32	31:02	76.7%	12.9	4.0	2.3	0.8	0.2	1.2	1.5	51–130	39.2%	53–129	41.1%	60–71	84.5%	50.4%	55.3%	27.4%	5	30:35 −0:27	76.5%	11.8 +1.8
Donovan Draper	30	26:52	62.2%	12.4	9.8	3.7	3.1	0.9	2.7	4.2	87–165	52.7%	4–37	10.8%†	64–82	78.0%	46.0%	52.5%	40.6%	5	23:36 −3:15	59.0%	6.0 −2.3
Jordan Pennick	32	25:07	62.1%	11.9	3.4	2.2	0.9	0.3	1.8	2.9	35–75	46.7%	43–137	31.4%	40–53	75.5%	46.9%	50.8%	25.0%	5	25:28 +0:21	63.7%	9.0 +1.5
Mike Woods	32	22:39	56.0%	11.4	7.1	2.5	1.2	0.6	1.4	3.9	67–132	50.8%	13–44	29.5%†	34–45	75.6%	49.1%	52.9%	25.6%	5	19:26 −3:14	48.6%	6.2 −0.3
Cam Cole	32	18:43	46.3%	12.8	4.0	3.4	1.9	0.9	2.1	4.6	26–50	52.0%	32–87	36.8%	44–58	75.9%	54.0%	59.1%	42.3%	5	22:50 +4:07	57.1%	9.6 +3.6
David BurnettUnder 100 minutes	17	5:39	7.4%	9.2	8.3	2.1	1.7	0.8	2.5	5.4	7–14	50.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	5–9	55.6%†	47.2%†	50.1%†	50.0%†	3	1:26 −4:13	2.2%	1.3 0.0
Sam KristUnder 100 minutes	14	2:20	2.5%	19.6	6.1	1.2	0.0	1.2	3.7	1.2	2–3	66.7%†	4–6	66.7%†	0–0	—	88.9%†	88.9%†	0.0%†	3	2:08 −0:12	3.2%	2.3 +1.2
Cooper JacksonUnder 100 minutes	15	2:07	2.5%	16.3	5.0	0.0	1.3	0.0	1.3	5.0	5–6	83.3%†	0–1	0.0%†	3–6	50.0%†	71.4%†	67.4%†	85.7%†	2	0:49 −1:18	0.8%	0.0 −0.9
Nyles HowardFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	2:51	2.0%	21.9	9.4	7.8	1.6	0.0	4.7	3.1	5–6	83.3%†	0–1	0.0%†	4–4	100.0%†	71.4%†	79.9%†	57.1%†	—	—	—	—
Julian GabbidonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	5:00	1.9%	6.4	1.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	2–2	100.0%†	33.3%†	51.5%†	66.7%†	2	0:35 −4:24	0.6%	0.0 −0.8
Cam CormanyUnder 100 minutes	13	1:40	1.7%	16.6	3.7	1.8	0.0	0.0	0.0	5.5	1–2	50.0%†	2–5	40.0%†	1–1	100.0%†	57.1%†	60.5%†	14.3%†	3	2:08 +0:28	3.2%	0.7 0.0
Jerry Ashley Jr.Few gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	1:37	0.9%	7.1	17.7	0.0	3.5	3.5	0.0	7.1	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	2–2	100.0%†	0.0%†	34.7%†	100.0%†	1	1:20 −0:17	0.7%	0.0 −0.3
Owen GrayFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	0:55	0.1%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	1	0:19 −0:36	0.2%	0.0 0.0
Matt GaffneyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	0:23	0.1%	0.0	52.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	32 games			73.2	35.4	15.7	not published	3.2	11.0	not published	620–1176	52.7%	209–583	35.8%	503–683	73.6%	53.1%	57.5%	38.8%
Sum of players				73.2	32.6	15.7	7.4	3.2	10.5	14.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+2.8	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

No EADA match for this school.

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 32 games, 2,110 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1295 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	73.2	64.9
Field goals made	25.6	23.1
Field goals attempted	54.3	55.9
3-pointers made	6.5	7.7
3-pointers attempted	18.0	25.7
Free throws made	15.5	10.9
Free throws attempted	21.1	14.5
Offensive rebounds	10.1	9.5
Defensive rebounds	25.2	21.6
Total rebounds	35.4	31.1
Assists	15.7	12.2
Blocks	3.2	2.9
Turnovers	11.0	12.0
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 239.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 461.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,370	2,370	0	±11.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	829	829	0	±4.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,759	1,759	0	±8.8	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	209	209	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	583	583	0	±2.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	503	503	0	±2.5	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	683	683	0	±3.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,145	1,055	+90	±91.6	0
Assists	Reconciled	507	507	0	±2.5	0
Blocks	Reconciled	104	104	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	355	339	+16	±10.7	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	239	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	461	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,475	6,449	+26.3	±129.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Austin Benigni	91.6%	+0.9range -0.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Aidan Kehoe	85.1%	+5.6range +4.1 to +7.1Sufficient evidence
Jinwoo Kim	77.3%	+0.6range -0.3 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Jordan Pennick	62.7%	-1.3range -2.6 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Donovan Draper	61.9%	+1.3range -0.3 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Mike Woods	56.3%	-0.0range -1.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Cam Cole	45.7%	+3.0range +1.6 to +4.3Sufficient evidence
David Burnett	7.6%	+0.5range -0.7 to +1.7Limited evidence
Sam Krist	2.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cooper Jackson	2.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Nyles Howard	2.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Julian Gabbidon	1.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cam Cormany	1.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jerry Ashley Jr.	0.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Owen Gray	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Matt Gaffney	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.7range +9.8 to +11.7Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

8 valued players hold 97.6% of on-court time. 8 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.5%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value