Dalen Davis
Princeton · 2025–26 · 19 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
550:01 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 19
- Minutes per game
- 28:57
- Points per game
- 14.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.8 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.4 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 281 | 45 | 41 | 10 | 1 | 42 | 38 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 89–233 | 38.2% | 12.3 | 16.9 |
| 2P | 60–155 | 38.7% | 8.2 | 11.3 |
| 3P | 29–78 | 37.2% | 4.1 | 5.7 |
| FT | 74–83 | 89.2% | 4.4 | 6.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.4% | 52.1% | 33.5% | 35.6% | 0.98 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Princeton · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Princeton: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Princeton | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.3 | -2.7 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -1.0 | +2.3range +1.9 to +2.8 | 1,792 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.8 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.2 | +2.8range +2.2 to +3.4 | 2,163 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.7 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -0.9 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.4 | 957 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:47 | 28:57 | 13:39–38:12 | |
| Points | 15.0 | 14.8 | 4.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 46.4% | 44.0% | 16.7%–69.2% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Yale | L 53–78 | 32:38 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-14 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 32.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | Dartmouth | W 82–61 | 33:30 | 20 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-3 | 6-6 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-27 | Harvard | L 56–58 | 33:56 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-20 | Brown | L 71–80 | 25:59 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | Columbia | L 65–75 | 37:50 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-14 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-13 | Cornell | L 65–89 | 26:04 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-13 | 3-4 | 4-4 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Penn | L 60–61 | 29:38 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Columbia | W 80–68 | 13:39 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-30 | Cornell | L 64–87 | 38:12 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Brown | W 63–53 | 29:16 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-12 | 2-4 | 12-12 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-19 | Dartmouth | L 69–71 | 16:41 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4-9 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-17 | Harvard | L 80–87 | 25:29 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-12 | 0-4 | 6-6 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Yale | W 76–60 | 27:33 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-05 | Penn | W 78–76 | 20:24 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8-13 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 69.2% |
| 2025-11-20 | Northeastern | W 70–57 | 29:09 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-11 | 1-3 | 5-5 | 40.9% |
| 2025-11-18 | Iona | L 69–89 | 31:10 | 15 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-16 | 1-6 | 4-4 | 34.4% |
| 2025-11-15 | Kansas | L 57–76 | 34:54 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6-20 | 2-8 | 7-9 | 35.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Bucknell | W 73–63 | 36:07 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8-16 | 2-4 | 7-8 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Akron | L 69–104 | 27:52 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-15 | 1-5 | 2-5 | 30.0% |