CJ Happy
Princeton · 2025–26 · 24 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
447:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 24
- Minutes per game
- 18:39
- Points per game
- 6.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.5 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.4 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.7 | 5.4 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 5.1 |
| Season totals | 153 | 60 | 39 | 10 | 7 | 32 | 57 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 60–154 | 39.0% | 6.4 | 13.8 |
| 2P | 36–77 | 46.8%† | 3.2 | 6.9 |
| 3P | 24–77 | 31.2% | 3.2 | 6.9 |
| FT | 9–24 | 37.5%† | 1.0 | 2.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.8% | 46.5% | 50.0% | 15.6% | 1.22 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Princeton · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Princeton: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Princeton | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.6 | -2.7 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | -0.2 | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.2 | 1,473 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Princeton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -0.7 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | +0.9 | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.4 | 811 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 13:30 | 18:39 | 9:09–28:20 | |
| Points | 3.8 | 6.4 | 0.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 54.0% | 45.5% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-20 | Brown | L 71–80 | 15:31 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Columbia | L 65–75 | 16:35 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-13 | Cornell | L 65–89 | 14:42 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Penn | L 60–61 | 9:09 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Columbia | W 80–68 | 11:34 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-30 | Cornell | L 64–87 | 16:04 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Brown | W 63–53 | 21:54 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-9 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-19 | Dartmouth | L 69–71 | 16:33 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Harvard | L 80–87 | 19:22 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Yale | W 76–60 | 19:39 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | Penn | W 78–76 | 14:26 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Vermont | W 75–69 | 25:37 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Temple | L 61–65 | 27:50 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-14 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-10 | Merrimack | L 56–59 | 17:03 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-06 | Loyola Chicago | L 68–73 | 28:20 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 38.9% |
| 2025-12-03 | Monmouth | L 58–63 | 25:53 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7-13 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 69.2% |
| 2025-11-26 | Vermont | L 74–79 | 27:04 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-12 | 4-6 | 0-4 | 91.7% |
| 2025-11-25 | Temple | L 75–79 | 19:49 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4-10 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Bradley | L 64–88 | 19:24 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Northeastern | W 70–57 | 18:23 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Iona | L 69–89 | 14:21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Kansas | L 57–76 | 15:22 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Bucknell | W 73–63 | 14:18 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | Akron | L 69–104 | 18:39 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 33.3% |