Princeton

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Princeton, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Jackson Hicke	85.0%	+0.4range -0.4 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	+4.5range +4.0 to +4.9Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Landon Clark	72.0%	-0.1range -1.2 to +1.3Sufficient evidence	+3.7range +3.3 to +4.2Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Malik Abdullahi	65.9%	-1.1range -1.9 to -0.0Sufficient evidence	+3.1range +2.7 to +3.5Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Jack Stanton	62.4%	+1.4range -0.0 to +2.4Sufficient evidence	+3.7range +3.3 to +4.1Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Jacob Huggins	52.5%	+0.8range -0.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence	+3.0range +2.7 to +3.3Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Dalen Davis	49.2%	-1.3range -2.7 to +0.5Sufficient evidence	+2.3range +1.9 to +2.8Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
CJ Happy	40.4%	-1.6range -2.7 to -0.2Sufficient evidence	+1.9range +1.6 to +2.2Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Sebastian Whitfield	30.3%	-1.9range -3.2 to -0.6Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Jacob Hammond	13.4%	-2.4range -3.2 to -1.6Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Peyton Seals	12.3%	+0.0range -0.9 to +0.9Limited evidence	+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Jake Sussberg	9.9%	-0.7range -1.9 to +0.3Limited evidence	+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Cash McSweeney	5.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Zio Kim	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Ryan Mandes	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
William Kutzler	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Lucas Denault	0.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading
Cooper Mueller	0.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$0 (assumed opted out)Loading	80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)Loading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

1 rostered player has no figure: no recorded possessions or no matched player record.

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Princeton University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,445,350	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,445,350
Athletics department expenses	$50,386,480
Athletics department revenue	$50,386,480

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 28 games passed lineup acceptance (100%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

No exclusions were recorded.

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$2,445,350	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$2,445,350	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	5
2 days	2
3 or more days	20

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	1
Longest run of consecutive away games	3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology