Brown

Ivy · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 282 · Raw net -7.7 · Tempo 66.7 · 25 Division I games · Through 2026-03-06

Record: 7–18; 7 wins
AdjNet: -7.9β; rank 278 of 365
AdjO: 99.2β; rank 340 of 365
AdjD: 107.1β; rank 150 of 365
AdjT: 67.7β
SOS: -1.9β; rank 224 of 363
NCSOS: -5.4β
WAB: -13.0β; rank 280 of 363
RR: -2.0β
Exp. W: 9.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	98.8337	106.5119	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	48.6298	51.3176	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.5337	18.762	16.7
Offensive rebound %	29.0236	30.0164	30.6
FTA / FGA %	28.1342	37.6253	35.0
Shooting
3P%	30.3338	33.5159	33.9
2P%	50.4241	52.2205	51.7
FT%	68.4316	75.9343	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	36.3	43.0	39.5
Assists / FGM %	59.5	55.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	12.1	9.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	28.4	33.0	31.4
2-pointers %	55.1	45.3	48.8
Free throws %	16.5	21.8	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.3
Top Three Share of Minutes: 40%
Bench Share of Minutes: 37%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	Siena	L 46–62	66.6	Home	0–1
11-09	Vermont	L 84–89 2OT	81.4	Home	0–2
11-12	Boston U.	L 77–90	64.0	Away	0–3
11-14	Hampton	L 63–72	63.7	Home	0–4
11-18	Holy Cross	W 68–49	61.2	Home	1–4
11-20	Stony Brook	L 70–80	66.9	Away	1–5
11-23	Maine	W 58–53	65.9	Away	2–5
11-26	New Hampshire	W 59–47	65.5	Away	3–5
12-02	Rhode Island	L 56–66	65.8	Away	3–6
12-05	Bryant	W 75–56	67.5	Home	4–6
12-09	Providence	L 79–86	76.2	Away	4–7
01-05	Yale	L 53–70	69.6	Home	4–8
01-10	Penn	L 73–81	67.7	Away	4–9
01-17	Columbia	W 86–80 1OT	73.1	Home	5–9
01-19	Cornell	L 67–89	70.6	Home	5–10
01-24	Princeton	L 53–63	63.8	Away	5–11
01-30	Harvard	L 59–69	60.9	Home	5–12
01-31	Dartmouth	L 70–77 1OT	74.7	Home	5–13
02-06	Yale	L 69–81	65.3	Away	5–14
02-13	Harvard	L 53–56	61.8	Away	5–15
02-14	Dartmouth	W 79–76	71.5	Away	6–15
02-20	Princeton	W 80–71	64.1	Home	7–15
02-27	Columbia	L 62–80	68.1	Away	7–16
02-28	Cornell	L 80–86	72.2	Away	7–17
03-06	Penn	L 61–82	71.8	Home	7–18

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 25 of 25 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jeremiah Jenkins	25	31:12	76.5%	10.8	4.8	6.8	2.5	0.2	3.8	3.2	34–99	34.3%	34–94	36.2%	40–53	75.5%	44.0%	48.5%	27.5%	5	29:43 −1:29	74.3%	5.2 −3.2
Adrian Uchidiuno	25	25:51	63.3%	14.1	4.3	1.7	1.5	0.4	2.4	3.3	48–109	44.0%	35–135	25.9%	26–32	81.3%	41.2%	44.0%	13.1%	5	17:42 −8:09	44.3%	6.6 −2.5
Landon Lewis	19	32:25	60.4%	20.7	9.4	2.4	1.0	1.2	2.9	3.3	129–237	54.4%	4–11	36.4%†	48–83	57.8%	54.4%	55.9%	33.5%	5	31:30 −0:55	78.7%	20.2 +3.5
N'famara Dabo	25	23:54	58.6%	11.9	9.5	1.6	1.5	2.2	1.4	5.2	70–111	63.1%	0–0	—	38–67	56.7%	63.1%	63.4%	60.4%	5	20:59 −2:54	52.5%	5.8 −1.3
Malcolm Wrisby-Jefferson	25	22:28	55.1%	7.8	6.3	4.6	1.8	0.3	2.8	3.3	36–84	42.9%	7–30	23.3%†	16–21	76.2%†	40.8%	44.2%	18.4%	5	27:33 +5:05	68.9%	5.6 +1.2
Isaiah Langham	25	21:01	51.5%	15.8	4.1	1.4	1.5	0.3	2.9	2.2	69–130	53.1%	12–58	20.7%	34–51	66.7%	46.3%	49.4%	27.1%	5	19:53 −1:08	49.7%	8.0 −0.3
David Rochester	20	22:05	43.3%	10.1	6.4	3.0	1.2	0.5	1.9	5.9	32–73	43.8%†	6–24	25.0%†	30–41	73.2%	42.3%†	48.7%†	42.3%†	4	17:53 −4:12	35.8%	4.3 −1.3
Luke Paragon	24	16:11	38.1%	16.7	3.3	1.0	0.9	0.4	1.2	3.4	17–29	58.6%	33–88	37.5%	29–31	93.5%	56.8%	62.0%	26.5%	5	24:50 +8:39	62.1%	12.4 +5.7
Charlie OSullivan	18	11:01	19.4%	11.3	5.0	2.8	0.6	1.0	2.0	4.2	9–12	75.0%†	12–42	28.6%†	2–4	50.0%†	50.0%†	50.2%†	7.4%†	5	11:32 +0:32	28.8%	4.4 +1.3
Brady Loughlin	11	18:00	19.4%	13.9	4.0	0.8	0.4	0.6	1.8	2.8	7–11	63.6%†	16–42	38.1%†	7–10	70.0%†	58.5%†	60.1%†	18.9%†	—	—	—	—
Wyatt DeGraafUnder 100 minutes	13	7:16	9.3%	9.3	6.8	0.8	1.3	3.0	3.0	3.0	10–16	62.5%†	0–0	—	2–5	40.0%†	62.5%†	60.4%†	31.3%†	1	1:33 −5:43	0.8%	0.0 −1.7
Drew KaniaFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	5:12	3.6%	9.9	5.5	1.1	1.1	0.0	2.2	5.5	2–7	28.6%†	0–0	—	5–7	71.4%†	28.6%†	44.6%†	100.0%†	1	4:45 −0:27	2.4%	4.0 +2.7
Jonah DreznerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:45	0.2%	0.0	17.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	1	1:12 +0:27	0.6%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	25 games			65.9	33.1	14.5	not published	3.7	13.0	not published	463–918	50.4%	159–524	30.3%	277–405	68.4%	48.6%	51.8%	28.1%
Sum of players				65.9	29.9	14.5	7.3	3.7	12.4	18.3	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.2	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.6	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Brown University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$1,919,760	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$1,919,760
Athletics department expenses	$43,218,288
Athletics department revenue	$43,218,288

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 25 games, 1,700 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1020 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	65.9	71.0
Field goals made	24.4	23.9
Field goals attempted	56.5	54.1
3-pointers made	6.2	7.8
3-pointers attempted	20.5	23.3
Free throws made	10.9	15.5
Free throws attempted	15.9	20.4
Offensive rebounds	10.1	9.9
Defensive rebounds	23.0	24.8
Total rebounds	33.1	34.7
Assists	14.5	13.2
Blocks	3.7	3.5
Turnovers	13.0	12.5
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 187.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 466.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

25 of 25 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	1,680	1,680	0	±8.4	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	622	622	0	±3.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,442	1,442	0	±7.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	159	159	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	524	524	0	±2.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	277	277	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	405	405	0	±2.0	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	845	763	+82	±67.6	0
Assists	Reconciled	370	370	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	95	94	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	331	315	+16	±9.9	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	187	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	466	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	5,100	5,086	+13.9	±102.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jeremiah Jenkins	76.9%	-0.4range -1.4 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Adrian Uchidiuno	63.2%	-2.1range -2.9 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Landon Lewis	61.2%	+0.7range -0.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
N'famara Dabo	59.1%	+1.0range -0.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Malcolm Wrisby-Jefferson	55.0%	-0.1range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Langham	51.6%	-2.7range -4.0 to -1.5Sufficient evidence
David Rochester	43.3%	-0.4range -1.4 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Luke Paragon	38.8%	+1.4range -0.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Charlie OSullivan	19.0%	+0.1range -0.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Brady Loughlin	18.9%	-0.4range -1.4 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Wyatt DeGraaf	9.2%	-0.5range -1.1 to +0.1Limited evidence
Drew Kania	3.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jonah Drezner	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.1range +8.2 to +9.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.2% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.8%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value