Rhode Island

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Rhode Island, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Tyler Cochran	77.0%	+2.1range +0.6 to +3.6Sufficient evidence	+6.0range +5.3 to +6.8Sufficient evidence	$145KspeculativeLoading	$51K to $345KLoading
Jonah Hinton	73.4%	+2.3range +0.9 to +3.7Sufficient evidence	+5.8range +5.1 to +6.4Sufficient evidence	$145KspeculativeLoading	$55K to $345KLoading
Keeyan Itejere	71.5%	+1.2range +0.1 to +2.5Sufficient evidence	+5.2range +4.5 to +5.9Sufficient evidence	$98KspeculativeLoading	$29K to $245KLoading
Myles Corey	63.6%	+2.9range +1.6 to +4.0Sufficient evidence	+5.3range +4.7 to +5.8Sufficient evidence	$150KspeculativeLoading	$57K to $375KLoading
RJ Johnson	57.9%	-0.2range -1.5 to +1.2Sufficient evidence	+3.7range +3.1 to +4.3Sufficient evidence	$48KspeculativeLoading	$7K to $145KLoading
Jahmere Tripp	51.0%	+2.5range +0.9 to +4.2Sufficient evidence	+4.2range +3.6 to +4.8Sufficient evidence	$115KspeculativeLoading	$41K to $290KLoading
Alex Crawford	48.1%	-1.0range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence	+2.8range +2.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidence	$26KspeculativeLoading	$4K to $97KLoading
Jalen Harper	24.0%	-2.1range -3.3 to -1.1Sufficient evidence	+1.2range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence	$12KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $44KLoading
Drissa Traore	12.9%	-3.3range -4.3 to -2.3Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence	$9KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $26KLoading
Damone King	12.2%	-2.4range -3.3 to -1.4Limited evidence	+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence	$10KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $28KLoading
Mouhamed Sow	6.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$6Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $15KLoading
Barrett Loer	1.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$6Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $15KLoading
Jimmy Ball	0.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$6Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $15KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $835K; 80% Range $365K to $1.85M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $805K to $960K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

The widest scenario range, $420K to $2.05M, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Tyler Cochran	77.0%	$145K	$51K to $345K	17.1%	$135K to $165K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jonah Hinton	73.4%	$145K	$55K to $345K	16.7%	$135K to $165K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Keeyan Itejere	71.5%	$98K	$29K to $245K	13.1%	$94K to $110K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Myles Corey	63.6%	$150K	$57K to $375K	16.8%	$145K to $170K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
RJ Johnson	57.9%	$48K	$7K to $145K	7.5%	$46K to $55K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jahmere Tripp	51.0%	$115K	$41K to $290K	13.0%	$110K to $130K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alex Crawford	48.1%	$26K	$4K to $97K	4.1%	$25K to $30K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalen Harper	24.0%	$12K	$3K to $44K	1.4%	$12K to $14K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Drissa Traore	12.9%	$9K	$3K to $26K	1.1%	$9K to $10K	$6K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Damone King	12.2%	$10K	$3K to $28K	1.1%	$9K to $11K	$6K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mouhamed Sow	6.7%	$6K	$2K to $15K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Barrett Loer	1.6%	$6K	$2K to $15K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jimmy Ball	0.0%	$6K	$2K to $15K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$835K	$365K to $1.85M	100%	$805K to $960K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Rhode Island (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$7,857,206	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$7,857,206
Athletics department expenses	$41,724,734
Athletics department revenue	$41,765,283

Coverage and exclusions

31 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

1 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$7,857,206	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$7,857,206	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	2
2 days	1
3 or more days	28

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	1
Longest run of consecutive away games	2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology