Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Arizona St.

B12 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 225 · Raw net -3.1 · Tempo 70.6 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-11

All seasons
Record
16–16
16 wins
AdjNet
6.1β
rank 91 of 365
AdjO
111.7β
rank 101 of 365
AdjD
105.6β
rank 106 of 365
AdjT
69.9β
SOS
10.0β
rank 16 of 363
NCSOS
2.9β
WAB
-2.0β
rank 71 of 363
RR
3.0β
Exp. W
13.0β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.107.9185111.0243108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%50.720052.524151.4
TO / 100 poss.17.020318.57316.7
Offensive rebound %29.821034.733330.6
FTA / FGA %39.56734.616635.0
Shooting
3P%33.320735.527533.9
2P%51.120852.120051.7
FT%75.85674.127172.5
Style
3PA / FGA %38.340.039.5
Assists / FGM %53.655.852.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %13.19.79.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %29.232.631.4
2-pointers %48.047.848.8
Free throws %22.819.619.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.2
Top Three Share of Minutes
44%
Bench Share of Minutes
32%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-04Southern UtahW 81–6472.7Home1–0
11-09Utah TechW 81–6671.0Home2–0
11-14GonzagaL 65–7769.8Home2–1
11-17Georgia St.W 75–6271.1Home3–1
11-21HawaiiW 83–7675.5—4–1
11-24TexasW 87–8675.0Neutral5–1
11-25Washington St.W 100–9471.3Neutral6–1
11-26Southern CaliforniaL 75–8866.2Neutral6–2
12-06OklahomaW 86–7072.8Neutral7–2
12-09Northern Ariz.W 73–4865.1Home8–2
12-13Santa ClaraW 82–7973.1Neutral9–2
12-17UCLAL 77–9070.9Away9–3
12-21Oregon St.L 75–7866.7Home9–4
01-03ColoradoL 89–9580.4Home9–5
01-07BYUL 76–10477.7Away9–6
01-10Kansas St.W 87–8476.6Home10–6
01-14ArizonaL 82–8970.3Away10–7
01-18HoustonL 73–10370.6Away10–8
01-21West VirginiaL 63–7565.4Home10–9
01-24CincinnatiW 82–6869.5Home11–9
01-27UCFL 76–7969.8Away11–10
01-31ArizonaL 74–8773.9Home11–11
02-04UtahW 71–6364.0Away12–11
02-07ColoradoL 70–7865.6Away12–12
02-10Oklahoma St.W 85–7674.7Home13–12
02-17Texas TechW 72–6766.1Home14–12
02-21BaylorL 68–7365.4Away14–13
02-24TCUL 78–9075.0Away14–14
02-28UtahW 73–6058.5Home15–14
03-03KansasW 70–6072.4Home16–14
03-07Iowa St.L 65–8673.0Away16–15
03-11Iowa St.L 42–9168.8Neutral16–16

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

MinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Maurice Odum3233:4684.4%19.73.66.81.60.13.72.876–17443.7%89–23238.4%113–13683.1%51.6%57.1%33.5%533:27 −0:1883.6%14.2 −2.4
Massamba Diop3229:2173.4%18.78.11.40.92.92.62.9157–26659.0%8–2334.8%†100–13872.5%58.5%62.6%47.8%530:35 +1:1476.4%13.2 −0.5
Anthony Johnson3224:4061.7%21.25.12.82.20.53.53.6106–21449.5%24–7432.4%134–17477.0%49.3%57.3%60.4%525:11 +0:3162.9%11.2 −1.9
Noah Meeusen2927:0161.2%8.44.73.92.00.41.92.924–4553.3%28–9529.5%33–3984.6%47.1%52.5%27.9%526:32 −0:2966.4%3.2 −2.5
Santiago Trouet3025:3459.9%12.59.31.41.11.21.42.981–17247.1%5–2420.8%†62–7978.5%45.2%51.8%40.3%526:15 +0:4165.6%8.2 +0.2
Andrija Grbovic3219:5049.6%13.35.80.80.90.31.34.629–6147.5%41–12034.2%30–3878.9%50.0%53.4%21.0%519:06 −0:4447.7%4.0 −2.6
Bryce Ford2622:4846.3%12.33.01.30.70.11.03.130–6248.4%31–10031.0%29–3582.9%47.2%51.3%21.6%519:28 −3:2048.7%6.2 −0.8
Allen Mukeba3216:3241.3%13.68.62.11.92.02.36.172–12756.7%1–425.0%†33–6253.2%56.1%56.9%47.3%515:06 −1:2637.8%4.4 −1.2
Marcus Adams Jr.1411:3312.6%12.48.20.70.71.01.74.76–1442.9%†8–2729.6%†14–2070.0%†43.9%†50.2%†48.8%†————
Trevor Best175:527.8%8.44.00.80.40.02.02.84–944.4%†2–1216.7%†7–1163.6%†33.3%†40.6%†52.4%†35:20 −0:328.0%1.7 +0.4
Kash Polk60:220.2%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————————
Quentin McCoy30:160.1%0.00.00.00.00.00.050.00–0—0–0—0–0————————
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes32 games76.133.213.84.712.0585–114451.1%237–71133.3%555–73275.8%50.7%55.9%39.5%
Sum of players76.129.813.86.94.711.617.3Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.50.0+0.1+0.3

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.55M
80% Range $2.55M to $4.95M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.55M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
2 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Maurice Odum84.7%$660K$395K to $1.05M18.1%$660K in all four$28KSufficient evidence
Massamba Diop74.1%$725K$415K to $1.45M19.4%$725K in all four$28KSufficient evidence
Noah Meeusen61.9%$405K$145K to $670K11.9%$405K in all four$28KSufficient evidence
Anthony Johnson61.3%$355K$86K to $605K10.7%$355K in all four$28KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Santiago Trouet59.9%$165K$24K to $375K5.0%$165K in all four$28KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Andrija Grbovic50.9%$325K$120K to $550K9.6%$325K in all four$28KSufficient evidence
Bryce Ford45.2%$165K$26K to $320K5.0%$165K in all four$28KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Allen Mukeba41.7%$380K$235K to $735K10.3%$380K in all four$28KSufficient evidence
Marcus Adams Jr.12.3%$83K$34K to $140K2.5%$83K in all four$28KLimited evidence
Trevor Best7.9%$41K$20K to $73K1.2%$41K in all four$28KLimited evidence
Kash Polk0.1%$28K$17K to $47K0.8%$28K in all four$28KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Quentin McCoy0.1%$28K$17K to $47K0.8%$28K in all four$28KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool—$3.55M$2.55M to $4.95M100%$3.55M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Arizona State University Campus Immersion (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$10,063,114Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$10,063,114
Athletics department expenses$149,346,605
Athletics department revenue$149,346,605

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 32 games, 2,259 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1280 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points76.178.3
Field goals made25.727.2
Field goals attempted58.059.9
3-pointers made7.48.5
3-pointers attempted22.224.0
Free throws made17.315.4
Free throws attempted22.920.8
Offensive rebounds10.312.2
Defensive rebounds23.024.1
Total rebounds33.236.3
Assists13.815.2
Blocks4.73.5
Turnovers12.013.1
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 222.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 553.
Minutes (derived)200.0

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,4362,4360±12.20
Field goals madeReconciled8228220±4.10
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,8551,8550±9.30
3-pointers madeReconciled2372370±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled7117110±3.60
Free throws madeReconciled5555550±2.80
Free throws attemptedReconciled7327320±3.70
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown1,063952+111±85.00
AssistsReconciled4414410±2.20
BlocksReconciled151149+2±2.00
TurnoversReconciled383372+11±11.50
StealsNo team figure222
Personal foulsNo team figure553
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,4006,380+19.8±128.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Maurice Odum84.7%+1.6range +0.6 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Massamba Diop74.1%+2.5range +0.9 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Noah Meeusen61.9%+1.1range -0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Anthony Johnson61.3%+0.5range -0.6 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Santiago Trouet59.9%-1.3range -2.4 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Andrija Grbovic50.9%+1.0range -0.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Bryce Ford45.2%-0.6range -2.0 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Allen Mukeba41.7%+2.1range +1.1 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Marcus Adams Jr.12.3%+0.1range -0.9 to +1.2Limited evidence
Trevor Best7.9%-2.4range -3.1 to -1.6Limited evidence
Kash Polk0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Quentin McCoy0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+10.4range +9.4 to +11.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 100.0% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 4.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value