Anthony Johnson
Arizona St. · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
789:17 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 24:40
- Points per game
- 13.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.2 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.1 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.2 | 5.1 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 418 | 101 | 55 | 44 | 10 | 69 | 71 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 130–288 | 45.1% | 9.0 | 14.6 |
| 2P | 106–214 | 49.5% | 6.7 | 10.8 |
| 3P | 24–74 | 32.4% | 2.3 | 3.8 |
| FT | 134–174 | 77.0% | 5.4 | 8.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.3% | 57.3% | 25.7% | 60.4% | 0.80 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Arizona St · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $355K
- 80% range $86K to $605K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.7%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $355K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $28K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 61.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Arizona St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Arizona St | $355Kspeculative | $86K to $605K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.5 | -0.6 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | +2.0 | -1.5 | +3.5range +3.0 to +4.0 | 2,677 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:11 | 24:40 | 16:04–36:54 | |
| Points | 11.2 | 13.1 | 4.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.8% | 50.9% | 18.2%–83.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | Iowa St. | L 42–91 | 22:26 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Iowa St. | L 65–86 | 23:49 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Kansas | W 70–60 | 27:53 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | Utah | W 73–60 | 26:21 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-11 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | TCU | L 78–90 | 25:24 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Baylor | L 68–73 | 28:07 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 8-10 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-17 | Texas Tech | W 72–67 | 31:10 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-10 | Oklahoma St. | W 85–76 | 31:20 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2-10 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Colorado | L 70–78 | 27:39 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Utah | W 71–63 | 27:17 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-12 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Arizona | L 74–87 | 25:35 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-4 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | UCF | L 76–79 | 22:09 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Cincinnati | W 82–68 | 22:58 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-21 | West Virginia | L 63–75 | 20:09 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | Houston | L 73–103 | 28:24 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-10 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 55.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Arizona | L 82–89 | 25:20 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 18.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | Kansas St. | W 87–84 | 23:20 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5-10 | 0-3 | 8-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | BYU | L 76–104 | 36:54 | 24 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7-21 | 3-9 | 7-9 | 40.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Colorado | L 89–95 | 28:23 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8-15 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Oregon St. | L 75–78 | 23:14 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | UCLA | L 77–90 | 21:56 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 14-14 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Santa Clara | W 82–79 | 19:33 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 8-9 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-09 | Northern Ariz. | W 73–48 | 18:25 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 38.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | Oklahoma | W 86–70 | 19:59 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 4-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Southern California | L 75–88 | 25:08 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 9-10 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-25 | Washington St. | W 100–94 | 24:01 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 7-11 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-24 | Texas | W 87–86 | 23:50 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 7-10 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-21 | Hawaii | W 83–76 | 24:49 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 7-9 | 45.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Georgia St. | W 75–62 | 16:04 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-14 | Gonzaga | L 65–77 | 22:40 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 1-5 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-09 | Utah Tech | W 81–66 | 24:25 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Southern Utah | W 81–64 | 20:35 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-9 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 77.8% |