George Mason

A-10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 69 · Raw net 7.6 · Tempo 64.7 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-17

Record: 22–10; 22 wins
AdjNet: 6.8β; rank 85 of 365
AdjO: 111.6β; rank 103 of 365
AdjD: 104.9β; rank 87 of 365
AdjT: 65.1β
SOS: 0.5β; rank 143 of 363
NCSOS: -6.1β
WAB: -2.4β; rank 76 of 363
RR: 1.5β
Exp. W: 20.5β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	112.693	105.088	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.7114	49.583	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.8124	15.4256	16.7
Offensive rebound %	31.3147	28.379	30.6
FTA / FGA %	41.143	28.944	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.3214	32.692	33.9
2P%	54.379	50.096	51.7
FT%	72.5190	71.2113	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.2	42.4	39.5
Assists / FGM %	49.9	52.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.3	9.8	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	26.0	34.6	31.4
2-pointers %	52.0	48.2	48.8
Free throws %	22.0	17.2	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.8
Top Three Share of Minutes: 46%
Bench Share of Minutes: 33%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Wofford	W 70–46	65.1	Home	1–0
11-07	Winthrop	W 96–90	76.6	Home	2–0
11-15	New Hampshire	W 61–44	66.1	Home	3–0
11-18	Jacksonville	W 79–57	65.4	Home	4–0
11-24	Ohio	W 92–69	67.5	Neutral	5–0
11-25	Fla. Atlantic	W 74–65	59.3	Neutral	6–0
11-29	James Madison	W 82–66	66.4	Home	7–0
12-02	Cornell	W 99–81	72.5	Home	8–0
12-06	Virginia Tech	L 62–73	64.4	Away	8–1
12-13	Old Dominion	W 73–61	71.2	Home	9–1
12-21	Loyola Maryland	W 86–79	67.1	Home	10–1
12-28	Penn	W 83–79	68.7	Home	11–1
12-31	La Salle	W 80–75	63.1	Away	12–1
01-03	Rhode Island	W 61–50	62.3	Home	13–1
01-07	Fordham	W 67–58	62.5	Away	14–1
01-10	VCU	W 86–80	66.6	Home	15–1
01-13	Loyola Chicago	W 82–74	63.5	Away	16–1
01-19	George Washington	W 69–64	67.4	Home	17–1
01-24	Rhode Island	L 65–74	59.6	Away	17–2
01-28	Davidson	W 60–52	58.2	Home	18–2
01-31	St. Bonaventure	W 77–73	70.5	Away	19–2
02-04	Duquesne	L 65–71	64.5	Home	19–3
02-07	Saint Joseph's	W 60–52	60.3	Home	20–3
02-10	Richmond	L 70–82	70.1	Away	20–4
02-13	George Washington	L 53–72	58.8	Away	20–5
02-18	Dayton	L 67–82	62.7	Home	20–6
02-25	Saint Joseph's	L 63–81	64.5	Away	20–7
02-28	St. Bonaventure	W 71–58	59.3	Home	21–7
03-03	VCU	L 65–70	60.8	Away	21–8
03-07	Saint Louis	W 86–57	62.9	Home	22–8
03-12	St. Bonaventure	L 57–63	60.9	Neutral	22–9
03-17	Liberty	L 71–77	63.0	—	22–10

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Kory Mincy	32	33:56	84.8%	453	115	93	34	1	51	65	87–180	48.3%	66–173	38.2%	81–92	88.0%	52.7%	57.6%	26.1%	5	35:05 +1:09	87.7%	13.4 −0.8
Jahari Long	32	32:49	82.0%	378	107	129	19	4	56	62	80–155	51.6%	48–129	37.2%	74–92	80.4%	53.5%	58.2%	32.4%	5	37:50 +5:01	94.6%	16.6 +4.8
Riley Allenspach	31	25:12	61.0%	424	190	27	18	8	40	56	139–217	64.1%	21–67	31.3%	83–123	67.5%	60.0%	62.7%	43.3%	5	28:36 +3:24	71.5%	14.4 +0.7
Masai Troutman	31	25:06	60.8%	261	104	37	16	10	39	37	46–95	48.4%	32–96	33.3%	73–90	81.1%	49.2%	56.6%	47.1%	5	30:47 +5:41	77.0%	9.2 +0.8
Fatt Hill	23	23:55	43.0%	238	84	43	18	5	43	59	72–135	53.3%	7–25	28.0%†	73–99	73.7%	51.6%	58.5%	61.9%	1	12:19 −11:36	6.2%	3.0 −7.3
Malik Presley	32	16:07	40.3%	97	48	27	13	8	24	48	33–58	56.9%†	5–20	25.0%†	16–34	47.1%	51.9%†	52.2%†	43.6%†	5	6:40 −9:27	16.7%	0.0 −3.0
Emmanuel Kanga	31	12:57	31.3%	145	163	16	6	20	14	65	49–83	59.0%†	0–0	—	47–79	59.5%	59.0%†	61.6%†	95.2%†	5	16:15 +3:18	40.6%	6.0 +1.3
Nick Ellington	30	13:01	30.5%	144	92	8	11	18	18	35	54–97	55.7%†	1–1	100.0%†	33–51	64.7%	56.6%†	59.8%†	52.0%†	5	18:21 +5:20	45.9%	6.8 +2.0
Dola Adebayo	26	12:18	25.0%	93	61	11	17	8	14	34	27–54	50.0%†	6–23	26.1%†	21–26	80.8%	46.8%†	52.6%†	33.8%†	4	8:14 −4:04	16.5%	1.5 −2.1
Stas Sivka	28	10:37	23.2%	55	39	8	2	8	9	16	11–19	57.9%†	9–36	25.0%†	6–10	60.0%†	44.5%†	46.3%†	18.2%†	4	8:04 −2:33	16.1%	1.0 −1.0
Devin Booker	24	7:48	14.6%	38	13	3	4	5	5	16	5–17	29.4%†	7–31	22.6%†	7–13	53.8%†	32.3%†	35.4%†	27.1%†	5	10:17 +2:29	25.7%	1.0 −0.6
T.J. ProsiseFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	1:22	0.5%	2	1	0	0	0	1	1	1–2	50.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	33.3%†	33.3%†	0.0%†	1	0:47 −0:35	0.4%	0.0 −0.4
Ben WoodwardFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	4	1:27	0.5%	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	32 games			2332	1117	403	not published	97	327	not published	606–1117	54.3%	202–607	33.3%	514–709	72.5%	52.7%	57.3%	41.1%
Sum of players				2328	1018	402	158	95	314	495	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				+4	+99	+1	not published	+2	+13	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $730K; 80% Range $320K to $1.65M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $705K to $815K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

The widest scenario range, $355K to $1.85M, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Kory Mincy	85.3%	$115K	$40K to $285K	16.7%	$110K to $130K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jahari Long	83.0%	$190K	$75K to $475K	24.6%	$180K to $210K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Riley Allenspach	62.2%	$65K	$17K to $170K	10.4%	$63K to $73K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Masai Troutman	60.0%	$47K	$8K to $135K	8.0%	$45K to $52K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Fatt Hill	43.9%	$38K	$8K to $105K	6.4%	$37K to $43K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Malik Presley	41.4%	$17K	$3K to $67K	2.9%	$16K to $19K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Emmanuel Kanga	30.8%	$59K	$22K to $155K	7.6%	$57K to $66K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nick Ellington	30.7%	$68K	$26K to $185K	8.6%	$66K to $76K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dola Adebayo	24.2%	$36K	$12K to $91K	5.1%	$34K to $40K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Stas Sivka	23.0%	$24K	$6K to $66K	3.9%	$23K to $27K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Devin Booker	14.5%	$9K	$3K to $28K	1.2%	$9K to $10K	$5K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
T.J. Prosise	0.5%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Ben Woodward	0.4%	$5K	$2K to $13K	0.8%	$5K to $6K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$730K	$320K to $1.65M	100%	$705K to $815K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, George Mason University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$5,776,180	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$5,776,180
Athletics department expenses	$32,534,218
Athletics department revenue	$32,979,325

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 32 games, 2,072 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,332	2,175
Field goals made	808	775
Field goals attempted	1,724	1,818
3-pointers made	202	251
3-pointers attempted	607	770
Free throws made	514	374
Free throws attempted	709	525
Offensive rebounds	315	317
Defensive rebounds	802	690
Total rebounds	1,117	1,007
Assists	403	410
Blocks	97	109
Turnovers	327	320
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 158.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 495.
Minutes (derived)	6,400	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,332	2,328	+4	±11.7	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	808	806	+2	±4.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,724	1,716	+8	±8.6	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	202	202	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	607	604	+3	±3.0	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	514	514	0	±2.6	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	709	709	0	±3.5	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,117	1,018	+99	±89.4	0
Assists	Reconciled	403	402	+1	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	97	95	+2	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	327	314	+13	±9.8	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	158	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	495	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,400	6,370	+30.0	±128.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Kory Mincy	85.3%	+1.7range +0.3 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Jahari Long	83.0%	+3.4range +1.9 to +4.7Sufficient evidence
Riley Allenspach	62.2%	+1.0range -0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Masai Troutman	60.0%	+0.3range -1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Fatt Hill	43.9%	+0.2range -1.1 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Malik Presley	41.4%	-1.4range -2.5 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Emmanuel Kanga	30.8%	+2.4range +1.2 to +3.8Sufficient evidence
Nick Ellington	30.7%	+3.0range +1.7 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Dola Adebayo	24.2%	+1.7range +0.3 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Stas Sivka	23.0%	+0.3range -0.7 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Devin Booker	14.5%	-2.1range -3.0 to -1.1Limited evidence
T.J. Prosise	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ben Woodward	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.8range +9.8 to +11.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.8% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value