Hampton

CAA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 265 · Raw net -6.2 · Tempo 66.0 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

Record: 11–19; 11 wins
AdjNet: -7.0β; rank 267 of 365
AdjO: 103.0β; rank 291 of 365
AdjD: 110.0β; rank 220 of 365
AdjT: 66.6β
SOS: -2.0β; rank 225 of 363
NCSOS: -4.1β
WAB: -13.1β; rank 283 of 363
RR: -0.7β
Exp. W: 11.7β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	102.2302	108.4178	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	45.7356	52.0212	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.0207	17.2136	16.7
Offensive rebound %	32.991	30.0165	30.6
FTA / FGA %	39.272	46.5355	35.0
Shooting
3P%	28.8358	32.167	33.9
2P%	47.1330	54.0275	51.7
FT%	72.5192	68.27	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	37.1	33.6	39.5
Assists / FGM %	48.8	50.6	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.5	11.8	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	26.8	23.9	31.4
2-pointers %	49.5	52.8	48.8
Free throws %	23.7	23.3	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 10.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 42%
Bench Share of Minutes: 41%
Players with Logged Minutes: 15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Milwaukee	L 86–90	79.6	Away	0–1
11-11	Virginia	L 53–91	67.2	Away	0–2
11-14	Brown	W 72–63	63.7	Away	1–2
11-16	Holy Cross	L 61–67	59.1	Neutral	1–3
11-18	Boston College	L 52–63	64.8	Away	1–4
11-21	Norfolk St.	L 60–62	61.8	Away	1–5
11-25	UMES	W 74–68	61.3	Away	2–5
12-03	Loyola Maryland	W 93–71	73.4	Home	3–5
12-13	Howard	L 57–61	67.5	Neutral	3–6
12-18	Jackson St.	W 84–77	71.7	Neutral	4–6
12-19	Grambling	L 72–81	66.6	Neutral	4–7
12-29	Stony Brook	W 62–59	64.3	Home	5–7
12-31	Towson	W 63–62	60.4	Home	6–7
01-03	UNCW	L 45–49	59.6	Away	6–8
01-08	Campbell	L 72–86	74.2	Away	6–9
01-10	Col. of Charleston	L 70–74	63.0	Away	6–10
01-19	N.C. A&T	W 82–61	64.4	Home	7–10
01-22	Monmouth	W 65–63	64.6	Home	8–10
01-24	UNCW	L 67–75	59.8	Home	8–11
01-29	Drexel	L 51–58	62.1	Away	8–12
01-31	Towson	L 50–82	65.7	Away	8–13
02-05	Elon	W 87–79 2OT	78.9	Home	9–13
02-07	William & Mary	W 77–74	71.5	Home	10–13
02-13	N.C. A&T	L 70–71	66.3	Neutral	10–14
02-19	Hofstra	L 43–79	61.0	Away	10–15
02-21	Stony Brook	L 72–79	68.9	Away	10–16
02-26	Col. of Charleston	L 71–85	68.4	Home	10–17
02-28	Northeastern	W 76–65	65.9	Home	11–17
03-03	William & Mary	L 85–94	72.1	Away	11–18
03-07	Towson	L 68–74	67.9	Neutral	11–19

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Xzavier Long	30	34:25	85.3%	293	287	56	32	19	59	77	71–137	51.8%	21–84	25.0%	88–130	67.7%	46.4%	52.7%	58.8%	5	34:30 +0:06	86.3%	10.0 +0.2
Daniel Johnson	30	25:39	63.6%	301	150	19	30	15	29	79	77–175	44.0%	34–108	31.5%	45–61	73.8%	45.2%	48.6%	21.6%	5	29:25 +3:46	73.6%	13.6 +3.6
Jalyke Gaines-Wyatt	27	27:04	60.4%	318	40	79	20	2	62	59	72–160	45.0%	19–69	27.5%	117–153	76.5%	43.9%	53.7%	66.8%	3	19:45 −7:19	29.6%	7.0 −4.8
Etienne Strothers	30	18:47	46.6%	183	48	44	29	9	37	57	32–80	40.0%	24–77	31.2%	47–61	77.0%	43.3%	49.8%	38.9%	5	22:34 +3:47	56.4%	9.4 +3.3
Josh Ogundele	26	18:05	38.9%	178	87	17	12	12	29	53	60–106	56.6%	4–9	44.4%†	46–75	61.3%	57.4%	60.1%	65.2%	5	18:28 +0:22	46.1%	9.0 +2.2
Kody Williams	27	15:59	35.7%	79	28	43	13	1	17	48	15–40	37.5%†	11–45	24.4%†	16–22	72.7%†	37.1%†	41.7%†	25.9%†	5	28:43 +12:44	71.8%	5.0 +2.1
Michael Eley	22	19:15	35.0%	287	70	15	14	4	15	49	72–122	59.0%	28–91	30.8%	59–64	92.2%	53.5%	59.5%	30.0%	5	18:16 −0:58	45.7%	14.2 +1.2
Christian Watson	23	17:37	33.5%	130	39	22	9	1	22	38	32–70	45.7%	10–39	25.6%†	36–46	78.3%	43.1%	50.3%	42.2%	5	10:21 −7:16	25.9%	3.0 −2.7
Eunique Rink	28	11:33	26.7%	48	52	3	7	18	12	56	21–35	60.0%†	0–0	—	6–12	50.0%†	60.0%†	59.6%†	34.3%†	4	7:28 −4:05	14.9%	2.0 +0.3
Aidan Haskins	28	9:46	22.6%	58	32	16	3	0	2	22	3–18	16.7%†	17–48	35.4%†	1–2	50.0%†	43.2%†	43.4%†	3.0%†	5	7:10 −2:36	17.9%	0.8 −1.3
Elijah Kennedy	21	12:25	21.5%	84	33	14	15	4	8	16	24–51	47.1%†	8–30	26.7%†	12–20	60.0%†	44.4%†	46.8%†	24.7%†	—	—	—	—
Quintin Cooper	25	7:30	15.5%	68	16	7	4	3	11	22	25–66	37.9%†	4–25	16.0%†	6–12	50.0%†	34.1%†	35.3%†	13.2%†	5	9:55 +2:25	24.8%	3.6 +0.9
Peter Oduro	23	5:17	10.0%	4	18	1	1	1	2	13	1–10	10.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	2–4	50.0%†	8.3%†	14.5%†	33.3%†	2	4:38 −0:40	4.6%	0.0 −0.2
Kellan LewisFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	3:41	2.1%	6	3	0	0	0	3	4	0–2	0.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	3–6	50.0%†	37.5%†	45.2%†	150.0%†	—	—	—	—
Hamza AsadallahFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	2:01	1.2%	3	3	0	0	0	0	0	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	30 games			2040	1046	335	not published	90	340	not published	505–1072	47.1%	182–631	28.8%	484–668	72.5%	45.7%	51.1%	39.2%
Sum of players				2040	906	336	189	89	308	593	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+140	−1	not published	+1	+32	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $215K; 80% Range $79K to $600K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $200K to $270K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 3 floor only

The widest scenario range, $98K to $730K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Xzavier Long	86.0%	$41K	$11K to $130K	19.2%	$38K to $51K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Daniel Johnson	67.1%	$35K	$10K to $120K	15.7%	$32K to $43K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalyke Gaines-Wyatt	58.9%	$6K	$1K to $33K	3.8%	$5K to $7K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Etienne Strothers	46.5%	$20K	$5K to $63K	10.0%	$19K to $25K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kody Williams	38.6%	$4K	$1K to $23K	2.9%	$4K to $6K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josh Ogundele	38.4%	$21K	$6K to $69K	9.4%	$20K to $26K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Michael Eley	33.2%	$18K	$6K to $58K	8.1%	$17K to $22K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Watson	30.2%	$7K	$1K to $27K	4.8%	$7K to $9K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eunique Rink	27.7%	$3K	$1K to $17K	1.8%	$3K to $4K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Aidan Haskins	23.5%	$8K	$1K to $25K	4.5%	$7K to $10K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Elijah Kennedy	22.3%	$15K	$4K to $52K	6.1%	$14K to $18K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Quintin Cooper	15.1%	$3K	$1K to $13K	2.1%	$3K to $4K	$1K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Peter Oduro	8.6%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.7%	$1K to $2K	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Kellan Lewis	2.5%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.7%	$1K to $2K	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Hamza Asadallah	1.4%	$1K	$0 to $4K	0.7%	$1K to $2K	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$215K	$79K to $600K	100%	$200K to $270K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Hampton University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,223,463
Men's basketball expenses	$2,993,447
Athletics department expenses	$17,330,745
Athletics department revenue	$17,330,745

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 30 games, 1,996 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,040	2,163
Field goals made	687	743
Field goals attempted	1,703	1,594
3-pointers made	182	172
3-pointers attempted	631	536
Free throws made	484	505
Free throws attempted	668	741
Offensive rebounds	366	292
Defensive rebounds	680	747
Total rebounds	1,046	1,039
Assists	335	376
Blocks	90	127
Turnovers	340	343
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 189.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 593.
Minutes (derived)	6,050	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,040	2,040	0	±10.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	687	687	0	±3.4	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,703	1,703	0	±8.5	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	182	182	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	631	631	0	±3.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	484	484	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	668	668	0	±3.3	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,046	906	+140	±83.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	335	336	−1	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	90	89	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	340	308	+32	±10.2	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	189	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	593	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,050	6,033	+17.2	±121.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Xzavier Long	86.0%	+0.7range -0.5 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Daniel Johnson	67.1%	+1.0range -0.0 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Jalyke Gaines-Wyatt	58.9%	-2.1range -3.1 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Etienne Strothers	46.5%	+0.4range -0.4 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Kody Williams	38.6%	-1.9range -3.2 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Josh Ogundele	38.4%	+0.9range -0.1 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Michael Eley	33.2%	+1.0range +0.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Christian Watson	30.2%	-0.6range -1.4 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Eunique Rink	27.7%	-2.2range -3.1 to -1.2Sufficient evidence
Aidan Haskins	23.5%	-0.3range -1.3 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Elijah Kennedy	22.3%	+1.4range +0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Quintin Cooper	15.1%	-1.1range -2.3 to -0.3Limited evidence
Peter Oduro	8.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Kellan Lewis	2.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Hamza Asadallah	1.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.1range +8.3 to +9.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 97.5% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.5%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value