Colgate

Pat · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 194 · Raw net -0.9 · Tempo 66.9 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-08

Record: 16–15; 16 wins
AdjNet: -3.3β; rank 221 of 365
AdjO: 108.3β; rank 173 of 365
AdjD: 111.6β; rank 264 of 365
AdjT: 67.9β
SOS: -3.0β; rank 264 of 363
NCSOS: 7.4β
WAB: -8.7β; rank 200 of 363
RR: -0.3β
Exp. W: 16.3β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	110.2128	111.1251	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	53.392	52.2224	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	14.647	15.3266	16.7
Offensive rebound %	26.6309	29.3126	30.6
FTA / FGA %	29.7315	33.8145	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.680	34.8238	33.9
2P%	53.2123	52.2211	51.7
FT%	74.797	71.9153	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	35.0	41.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	51.4	54.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.4	6.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	29.1	33.8	31.4
2-pointers %	53.7	47.3	48.8
Free throws %	17.2	18.9	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Michigan St.	L 69–80	69.2	Away	0–1
11-07	Northeastern	L 65–68	67.2	Home	0–2
11-11	Drexel	W 90–83	69.5	Home	1–2
11-14	Illinois	L 65–84	66.8	Away	1–3
11-17	Siena	W 72–69	64.3	Away	2–3
11-20	Cornell	L 94–95 2OT	91.7	Away	2–4
11-28	UAlbany	W 69–67	64.3	Neutral	3–4
11-30	Fordham	W 72–62	64.3	Neutral	4–4
12-10	St. Bonaventure	L 77–85	69.7	Away	4–5
12-21	Florida	L 60–90	64.8	Away	4–6
12-28	Harvard	L 69–78	68.8	Home	4–7
12-31	Lafayette	W 85–77	73.5	Away	5–7
01-03	Army West Point	W 76–69	61.0	Away	6–7
01-07	American	W 64–62	59.4	Home	7–7
01-10	Lehigh	L 77–78	65.2	Home	7–8
01-14	Loyola Maryland	W 86–80	72.2	Away	8–8
01-17	Bucknell	W 95–76	71.4	Home	9–8
01-21	American	L 66–70	67.3	Away	9–9
01-24	Boston U.	W 80–79 1OT	72.8	Home	10–9
01-28	Holy Cross	W 79–74	66.2	Home	11–9
01-31	Lehigh	L 76–77 1OT	71.3	Away	11–10
02-04	Army West Point	W 69–55	64.3	Home	12–10
02-07	Bucknell	W 78–59	73.4	Away	13–10
02-11	Holy Cross	W 74–70	68.5	Away	14–10
02-14	Navy	L 80–84 1OT	71.6	Home	14–11
02-16	Boston U.	L 58–85	57.3	Away	14–12
02-21	Loyola Maryland	W 101–98 1OT	87.3	Home	15–12
02-25	Lafayette	L 69–70	62.4	Home	15–13
02-28	Navy	L 69–85	66.5	Away	15–14
03-05	Loyola Maryland	W 90–77	64.5	Home	16–14
03-08	Lehigh	L 69–76	68.5	Away	16–15

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jalen Cox	29	34:51	79.6%	21.1	6.1	6.0	1.9	0.3	2.8	2.3	182–336	54.2%	17–49	34.7%†	118–138	85.5%	53.9%	59.8%	35.8%	4	37:50 +2:59	73.8%	24.8 +6.4
Andrew Alekseyenko	31	30:28	74.4%	19.6	8.7	3.1	1.1	0.3	2.9	3.3	134–252	53.2%	41–105	39.0%	71–91	78.0%	54.8%	58.2%	25.5%	5	32:51 +2:23	80.1%	15.4 +0.5
Ben Tweedy	31	29:57	73.1%	12.0	4.1	3.4	0.8	0.0	1.8	2.5	50–98	51.0%	40–105	38.1%	58–83	69.9%	54.2%	58.0%	40.9%	5	35:03 +5:06	85.5%	14.4 +5.4
Sam Wright	31	26:38	65.0%	18.8	6.9	1.2	0.8	0.1	1.5	3.5	112–185	60.5%	37–119	31.1%	53–88	60.2%	55.1%	56.6%	28.9%	5	27:00 +0:22	65.8%	12.2 −0.3
Josh Ahayere	30	25:14	59.6%	11.9	5.7	2.1	1.3	0.4	1.2	4.3	55–105	52.4%	21–60	35.0%	52–71	73.2%	52.4%	57.3%	43.0%	5	29:22 +4:08	71.6%	7.6 +0.1
Kyle Carlesimo	31	24:15	59.2%	13.0	3.9	1.6	1.5	0.2	1.2	2.8	33–70	47.1%	56–156	35.9%	11–13	84.6%†	51.8%	52.9%	5.8%	5	24:16 +0:01	59.2%	6.4 −1.5
Cooper Wright	28	12:03	26.6%	4.9	5.6	2.1	1.3	1.4	1.3	2.6	20–35	57.1%†	0–0	—	1–7	14.3%†	57.1%†	53.8%†	20.0%†	5	13:37 +1:34	33.2%	2.0 +0.5
Ayomi Odetoyinbo	31	10:35	25.8%	7.3	8.7	0.9	0.6	4.4	1.2	6.3	27–47	57.4%†	0–1	0.0%†	6–11	54.5%†	56.3%†	56.8%†	22.9%†	5	6:59 −3:36	17.0%	0.6 −1.3
Brady Cummins	17	16:57	22.7%	10.3	2.8	1.7	1.0	0.1	1.5	4.4	10–34	29.4%†	12–35	34.3%†	18–20	90.0%†	40.6%†	47.6%†	29.0%†	1	6:16 −10:41	3.1%	0.0 −4.4
Ethan Brown	16	7:20	9.2%	8.2	6.5	0.7	0.7	2.0	1.7	4.1	3–11	27.3%†	2–6	33.3%†	12–15	80.0%†	35.3%†	50.8%†	88.2%†	1	11:59 +4:39	5.8%	2.0 +0.5
Cameron BrennanUnder 100 minutes	11	3:39	3.2%	10.0	7.0	1.0	2.0	4.0	4.0	13.0	3–9	33.3%†	0–0	—	4–4	100.0%†	33.3%†	46.5%†	44.4%†	3	2:33 −1:06	3.7%	1.3 +0.4
Charles PughFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	0:55	0.4%	0.0	0.0	7.3	0.0	7.3	7.3	7.3	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	1	0:56 +0:01	0.5%	0.0 0.0
Jonathan NivFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	0:49	0.4%	24.5	8.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	8.2	0.0	0–1	0.0%†	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:56 +0:07	0.5%	0.0 −0.5
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	31 games			73.8	32.8	13.9	not published	2.8	9.8	not published	629–1183	53.2%	227–637	35.6%	404–541	74.7%	53.3%	56.9%	29.7%
Sum of players				73.8	29.6	13.9	5.9	2.8	9.4	16.9	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.2	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.3	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $0 (assumed opted out); 80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier: Low and other; low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Colgate University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,998,744	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,998,744
Athletics department expenses	$39,791,052
Athletics department revenue	$39,791,052

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 31 games, 2,125 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1270 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	73.8	74.4
Field goals made	27.0	26.0
Field goals attempted	57.3	57.8
3-pointers made	7.1	8.4
3-pointers attempted	20.1	24.1
Free throws made	12.7	14.0
Free throws attempted	17.0	19.5
Offensive rebounds	8.6	10.0
Defensive rebounds	24.2	23.8
Total rebounds	32.8	33.9
Assists	13.9	14.2
Blocks	2.8	2.4
Turnovers	9.8	10.2
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 188.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 535.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,343	2,343	0	±11.7	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	856	856	0	±4.3	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,820	1,820	0	±9.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	227	227	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	637	637	0	±3.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	404	404	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	541	541	0	±2.7	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,041	939	+102	±83.3	0
Assists	Reconciled	440	440	0	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	90	89	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	311	300	+11	±9.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	188	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	535	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,350	6,339	+11.1	±127.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jalen Cox	81.6%	+1.7range +0.7 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Andrew Alekseyenko	75.6%	+0.4range -1.0 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Ben Tweedy	73.9%	+0.8range -0.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Sam Wright	65.8%	+0.3range -0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Josh Ahayere	61.5%	+1.0range -0.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Kyle Carlesimo	58.5%	-1.5range -3.0 to +0.0Sufficient evidence
Cooper Wright	25.6%	-0.1range -1.7 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Ayomi Odetoyinbo	24.4%	+0.0range -1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Brady Cummins	19.2%	-0.4range -1.1 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Ethan Brown	9.7%	-2.4range -3.4 to -1.3Limited evidence
Cameron Brennan	3.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Charles Pugh	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jonathan Niv	0.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.8range +8.9 to +10.6Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.2% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value